工业工程

工业工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 60-69.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.230207

• 绿色供应链管理 • 上一篇    

基于区块链和消费者敏感的农业供应链融资上链决策研究

刘琦铀, 林丽婷, 张成科   

  1. 广东工业大学 经济学院，广东 广州，510520
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-27 发布日期:2024-09-07
  • 通讯作者: 张成科 (1964—)，男，广西壮族自治区人，教授，博士， 主要研究方向为管理博弈论及其应用、经济建模与计算机仿真。Email：Chengke-z@163.com E-mail:Chengke-z@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘琦铀 (1983—)，男，江西省人，副教授、博士，主要研究方向为低碳供应链优化、绿色供应链金融、农业供应链金融。Email：liuqiyou1215@gdut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金规划资助项目 (22BGL067)

Financing On-chain Decision-Making in Agricultural Supply Chains Based on Blockchain and Consumer Sensitivity

LIU Qiyou, LIN Liting, ZHANG Chengke   

  1. School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
  • Received:2023-10-27 Published:2024-09-07

PDF

5

摘要： 为解决绿色农业供应链发展面临的生产端资金短缺、消费端食品安全顾虑等问题，将消费者农产品质量和信息搜索成本敏感系数等引入农业供应链融资上链决策中，分别构建电商采用、不采用区块链技术下，农户通过供应链内部、外部融资4种不同情境组合下的博弈模型；通过理论推导和实证仿真分析，探讨农产品质量敏感系数、农产品质量信息搜索成本敏感系数、上链与融资成本等参数对农户融资模式选择和电商上链决策的影响。研究发现，在电商不同上链决策下，当农户外部融资利率大于电商资金机会成本时，内部融资优于外部融资；反之，外部融资优于内部融资。在农户不同融资模式下，当电商上链净收益大于零时，上链为电商最优决策；当上链净收益为负，且上链所节省融资成本不足以抵消该负收益时，不上链为最优决策。

关键词: 区块链, 融资模式, 供应链金融, 农业供应链

Abstract: To solve the challenges of production-side funding shortages and consumption-side food safety concerns in the development of green agricultural supply chains, this study incorporates factors such as consumer sensitivity to agricultural product quality and information search cost into financing on-chain decision-making in agricultural supply chains. Game models of four different situations are established: e-commerce with and without blockchain technology, and internal and external financing for farmers within a supply chain. Through theoretical derivation and empirical simulation analysis, the impact of parameters, such as the sensitivity coefficients of agricultural product quality and information search cost, and the cost associated with blockchain and financing, on farmer choices of financing mode and e-commerce on-chain decisions, is explored. It is found that: with different on-chain decisions of e-commerce, when the external financing rate of farmers is greater than the opportunity cost of e-commerce funds, internal financing is better than external financing, otherwise, external financing is better than internal financing; under different financing modes of farmers, when the on-chain benefit of e-commerce is positive, adopting on-chain is the optimal decision for e-commerce; when the on-chain benefit is negative, and the financing cost saved by on-chain is not enough to offset this negative benefit, not adopting on-chain is the best decision.

Key words: blockchain, financing mode, supply chain financing, agricultural supply chain

中图分类号: