目标出现概率、目标有无和时间压力对视觉搜索绩效的影响

工业工程

目标出现概率、目标有无和时间压力对视觉搜索绩效的影响

1. 清华大学工业工程系，北京 100084； 2. 中国标准化研究院人类工效学实验室，北京100191

出版日期:2016-12-31 发布日期:2017-02-22
作者简介:杨林栋 (1991-)，男，河南省人，博士研究生，主要研究方向为人因工程、管理工效学.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471098)；中国标准化研究院中央基本科研业务费项目(522015Y-3991)

Effects of Target Prevalence, Target Presence and Time Pressure on Visual Search Performance

1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Human Factors and Ergonomics Laboratory, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China

Online:2016-12-31 Published:2017-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生产生活中很多视觉搜索任务是在低目标出现概率、有时间压力的条件下进行的。本研究分析了目标出现概率、目标有无和时间压力对视觉搜索任务绩效的影响。实验将目标出现概率作为组间变量，目标有无和时间压力作为组内变量，进行了完全2×2×2因子实验设计。结果表明时间压力和低目标出现概率会显著降低搜索时间、凝视时间和凝视次数。目标有无和时间压力、目标有无和目标出现概率对搜索时间的影响交互效应显著。时间压力和目标出现概率对搜索时间的影响交互效应不显著，但对凝视时间和凝视次数的影响交互效应显著。实验结果对于视觉搜索作业任务设计，尤其是如安检等有时间压力、低目标出现概率的作业任务设计具有指导意义。


关键词: 目标出现概率, 目标有无, 时间压力, 视觉搜索, 绩效

Abstract:

Many real-world visual search tasks are performed under low target prevalence and time pressure conditions. The present study conducted a 2×2×2 mixed experiment design with target prevalence being a betweensubject factor, and target presence and time pressure withinsubject factors. Reaction time and eye movement data were recorded and analyzed. It was found that reaction time, fixation times and duration had significant decrease with time pressure and low target prevalence. The interaction effects of time pressure and target presence, target prevalence and target presence on reaction time were significant. The interaction effect of target prevalence and time pressure on reaction time was not significant, but the two variables′ interaction effects on fixation times and duration were significant. The findings provide guidelines to designing visual search tasks under low prevalence and time pressure conditions.

Key words: target prevalence, target presence, time pressure, visual search, performance

杨林栋1，宋馥璇1，张运红2，于瑞峰1. 目标出现概率、目标有无和时间压力对视觉搜索绩效的影响[J]. 工业工程.

YANG Lindong1, SONG Fuxuan1, ZHANG Yunhong2, YU Ruifeng1. Effects of Target Prevalence, Target Presence and Time Pressure on Visual Search Performance[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal .

参考文献

［1］WOLFE J M, HOROWITZ T S. Visual search［J］. Scholarpedia, 2008, 3(7): 3325.
［2］杨林栋, 刘厚, 于瑞峰. 视野培训对视觉搜索绩效的影响［J］. 工业工程, 2014, 17(3): 108-113.
YANG Lindong, LIU Hou, YU Ruifeng. A study of effect of visual lobe training on visual search performance［J］. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2014, 17(3): 108-113.
［3］GUR D, SUMKIN J H, ROCKETTE H E, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computeraided detection system［J］. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004, 96(3): 185-190.
［4］MACKWORTH J F. Vigilance and attention: a signal detection approach［M］. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.
［5］WOLFE J M, HOROWITZ T S, KENNER N M. Rare items often missed in visual searches［J］. Nature, 2005, 435(7041): 439-440.
［6］RICH A N, KUNAR M A, VAN WERT M J, et al. Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect［J］. Journal of Vision, 2008, 8(15): 1-17.
［7］WOLFE J M, HOROWITZ T S, VAN WERT M J, et al. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks［J］. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007, 136(4): 623-638.
［8］FLECK M S, MITROFF S R. Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search［J］. Psychological Science, 2007, 18(11): 943-947.
［9］VAN WERT M J, HOROWITZ T S, WOLFE J M. Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed［J］. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2009, 71(3): 541-553.
［10］LAU J S H, HUANG L. The prevalence effect is determined by past experience, not future prospects［J］. Vision Research, 2010, 50(15): 1469-1474.
［11］SCHWARK J, SANDRY J, MACDONALD J, et al. False feedback increases detection of low-prevalence targets in visual search［J］. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012, 74(8): 1583-1589.
［12］ORDONEZ L, BENSON III L. Decisions under time pressure: how time constraint affects risky decision making［J］. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997, 71(2): 121-140.
［13］EDLAND A, SVENSON O. Judgment and decision making under time pressure//Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making［M］. US: Springer, 1993: 27-40. 
［14］ARIELY D, ZAKAY D. A timely account of the role of duration in decision making［J］. Acta Psychologica, 2001, 108(2): 187-207.
［15］WALRATH L C, BACKS R W. Time stress interacts with coding, density, and search type in visual display search［C］. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, California: SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1989: 1496-1500.
［16］TSIMHONI O, GREEN P. Timesharing of a visual invehicle task while driving: the effects of four key constructs［C/OL］.（2004-03-16）.https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=698794.
［17］郭小筠. 速度，时间压力和目标个数对动态视觉搜索绩效的影响［D］. 北京：清华大学, 2011.
GUO Xiaoyun. Investigate the effects of velocity, time stress, and item number on dynamic visual search performance［D］. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2011.
［18］MCCARLEY J S. Effects of speed-accuracy instructions on oculomotor scanning and target recognition in a simulated baggage Xray screening task［J］. Ergonomics, 2009, 52(3): 325-333.

[1]	曲立, 王璐, 吴竹南, 齐二石. 现场管理工具运用对现场管理绩效提升的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 117-123.
[2]	徐新然, 郭肖亚, 于瑞峰. Gap效应对搜索目标显著性和绩效的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 117-122.
[3]	刘娇, 杨敬江. 基于知识协同的联盟企业创新绩效系统动力学模型构建与分析[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(5): 132-139.
[4]	程欢, 吴夷敏, 张光磊. 结构性创新对组织绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(4): 71-78.
[5]	李奇, 苗瑞, 张洁, 江志斌, 付圆. 面向电动汽车租赁的多目标服务组合优化设计[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(4): 101-108.
[6]	张玉磊, 朱怀念, 陈茜, 张光宇. 专业镇中小微企业技术创新服务平台绩效评价与实证研究——以广东省为例[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(4): 123-131.
[7]	赵正佳, 余曦. 高端装备制造企业效率及其与绩效关系的研究[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(3): 30-36.
[8]	邬益男, 战洪飞, 余军合. 基于需求层次分析的知识情境模型构建及实证研究[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(2): 73-81.
[9]	苏海涛, 方涛, 胡金枝. 基于学习曲线方法的残疾人生产线工作绩效提升研究[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(3): 23-27.
[10]	刘娜, 张运红, 于瑞峰, 张高艳. 动态视觉搜索任务中显示移动速度对视觉疲劳的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(2): 51-55.
[11]	杨林栋，于瑞峰. 人格特征和任务难度对视觉搜索绩效的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(1): 91-96.
[12]	卢荣花1,2, 李南1. 环境绩效视角下的闭环供应链定价和协调[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 34-39.
[13]	卢纪华，唐志昆，赵希男. 相互依赖、沟通与供应链联盟绩效的关系研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 56-63.
[14]	史德强，陆刚，王磊. 煤矿井下作业人因可靠性[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 155-159.
[15]	谢卫红1，李忠顺1，屈喜凤1，王永健2. 实物期权理论的IT能力与企业绩效关系：时间节奏的中介作用[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(4): 22-30.