总量-交易机制下竞争性供应链间减排策略

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.e17-1170

工业工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 36-42.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.e17-1170

总量-交易机制下竞争性供应链间减排策略

郭继东¹, 杨月巧¹, 马志超²

1. 防灾科技学院经济管理系, 河北廊坊 065201;
2. 河钢集团国际物流有限公司, 河北石家庄 050023

收稿日期:2017-07-12 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2018-03-12
作者简介:郭继东(1977-),男,河南省人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向为供应链低碳化博弈
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71602008）；河北省社会科学基金资助项目（HB17GL003）

Carbon Emission Reduction for Competitive Supply Chains under the Cap-and-Trading Scheme

GUO Jidong¹, YANG Yueqiao¹, MA Zhichao²

1. Department of Economics and Management, Institute of Disaster Prevention Science and Technology, Langfang 065201, China;
2. International Logistics Co., Ltd., HBIS Group, Shijiazhuang 050023, China

Received:2017-07-12 Online:2018-02-28 Published:2018-03-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在碳排放总量-交易机制下，为了研究两个初始碳排放存在差异的竞争性供应链减排问题，借助动态博弈论，构建了双方的Stackelberg博弈模型，并利用逆向归纳法解析得到了供应链间交互影响的定价和减排策略。考虑到系统均衡在形式上的复杂性，基于三维数值仿真技术，在Matlab中模拟了关键参数对系统绩效指标的影响。给出了两个供应链减排和定价策略与系统关键参数之间的量化变化关系。研究发现，过高的碳技术投资成本不利于市场竞争性减排；趋同性高度竞争市场不利于减排；碳技术投资成本和低碳意识的同步改善能最大化消费者剩余。

关键词: 总量–交易机制, 碳排放, 竞争性供应链, Stackelberg博弈, 数值仿真

Abstract: Under the Cap-and-Trading scheme, aiming at carbon emission reduction for two competitive supply chains with different original carbon emission, a Stackelberg model is constituted based on dynamic game theory. The backward induction analysis method is applied to get the pricing and carbon emission reduction strategies. Due to the complexity in their form, the 3-dimensional numerical simulation technique is used to simulate the impact of key parameters to system performance indexes. Quantitative relations among carbon emission, pricing strategies and key parameters are finally obtained. Results show that much high emission reduction investment can not benefit their carbon emission, but product differentiation can play its role, and improvement in low carbon technology investment and environmental consciousness meanwhile will tend to maximize consumer surplus.

Key words: cap-and-trade scheme, carbon emissions, competitive supply chains, Stackelberg game, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

F224.32

郭继东, 杨月巧, 马志超. 总量-交易机制下竞争性供应链间减排策略[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 36-42.

GUO Jidong, YANG Yueqiao, MA Zhichao. Carbon Emission Reduction for Competitive Supply Chains under the Cap-and-Trading Scheme[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2018, 21(1): 36-42.

参考文献

[1] 方德斌, 董博. 基于GPR模型的中国“十三五”时期碳排放趋势预测[J]. 技术经济, 2015, 34(6): 106-113.
FANG Debin, DONG Bo. Prediction of China's carbon emission trend during thirteenth Five-year Development Planning based on GPR model[J]. Technology Economics, 2015, 34(6): 106-113.
[2] BRIAN W, JACOBS R S. Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2012, 21(1): 85-100.
[3] BEANJAAFAR S, LI Y Z, D M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models[J]. IEE Transactions On Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1): 1-18.
[4] 陈剑. 低碳供应链管理研究[J]. 系统管理学报. 2012(6): 721-728.
CHEN Jian. Study on supply shain management in a low-carbon era[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2012, 21(6): 721-728.
[5] 江玉国, 范莉莉. 企业低碳竞争力的影响因素—基于碳无形资产视角的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 2015, 34(5): 78-85.
JIANG Yuguo, FAN Lili. Influence factor of low-carbon competitiveness: empirical study based on perspective of carbon-intangible asset[J]. Technology Economics, 2015 34(5): 78-85.
[6] 熊中楷, 张盼, 郭年. 供应链中碳税和消费者环保意识对碳排放影响[J]. 系统工程理论与实践. 2014(9): 2245-2252.
XIONG Zhongkai, ZHANG Pan, GUO Nian. Impact of carbon tax and consumers' environmental awareness on carbon emissions in supply chains[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(9): 2245-2252.
[7] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 44-53.
LUO Ruiling, FAN Tijun, XIA Haiyang. The game analysis of carbon reduction technology investment on supply chain under carbon cap-and-trade rules[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(11): 44-53.
[8] 赵道致, 王楚格. 考虑低碳政策的供应链企业减排决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(1): 105-111.
ZHAO Daozhi, WANG Chuge. A research on emission reduction decisions in supply chain with low-carbon policy considered[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2014, 17(1): 105-111.
[9] 范如国, 邢亚敏. 考虑合谋和声誉的高能耗企业碳减排主体间博弈分析[J]. 技术经济, 2016, 35(3): 81-87, 101.
FAN Ruguo, XING Yamin. Analysis on game among agents in carbon reduction process of energy-intensive enterprise considering collusion and reputation[J]. Technology Economics, 2016, 35(3): 81-87, 101.
[10] CHAABANE A, RAMUDHIN A, PAQUET M. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 135(1): 37-49.
[11] DU S, MA F, FU Z, et al. Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 228(1): 135-149.
[12] 谢鑫鹏, 赵道致. 低碳供应链企业减排合作策略研究[J]. 管理科学, 2013(3): 108-119.
XIE Xinpeng, ZHAO Daozhi. Research on cooperation strategy of enterprises' carbon emission reduction in low carbon supply chain[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2013, 26(3): 108-119.

[1]	吴春尚. 基于Stackelberg博弈模型的不同主导权的三级农产品电商供应链决策分析[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 160-167.
[2]	陈佳媛, 周刚. 不同主导权结构下服务水平对高铁快递供应链价格策略的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 168-176.
[3]	黄帅, 杨玉中. 基于互补产品的双渠道供应链合作广告博弈分析[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 153-160.
[4]	李芳, 马艳, 王豪丽. 制造商主导下差别主体努力的闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(2): 27-33.
[5]	王宁, 张玉萍, 赵姣, 金子阳. 考虑碳排放及时间窗的LIRP模型与算法研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(2): 34-42.
[6]	宋英华, 曹雪竹, 刘丹. 考虑风险规避与零售商谎报行为的绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 19-26,34.
[7]	唐丽敏, 邹奕奕, 孙菊. 面向主机厂的汽车零部件供应库存-运输集成优化[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(6): 68-74.
[8]	庞庆华, 周未沫, 向敏. 碳税情形下考虑低碳偏好的收益共享契约协调模型[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(6): 75-82.
[9]	邢光军, 李云云. 考虑消费者绿色偏好的竞争性闭环供应链生产决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(5): 22-29.
[10]	肖敏, 张耀. 双重干预及产能约束下的闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(4): 28-35.
[11]	刘名武, 潘艳屏. 基于看涨期权的制造商碳排放权交易策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(4): 61-68.
[12]	张子健, 郭明波, 陈全朋. EPR下动力电池梯度利用的闭环供应链定价策略与协调机制[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(3): 10-18.
[13]	舒秘. 不同渠道结构下再制造商进入对制造商定价的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(3): 30-37.
[14]	石永强, 王佳欣, 张智勇. 基于博弈论的两级逆向供应链定价策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(3): 45-50,58.
[15]	林强, 陈林, 甯清万, 秦星红. 不同主导力量下考虑公平偏好的旅游供应链定价策略[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(1): 87-95.

总量-交易机制下竞争性供应链间减排策略

Carbon Emission Reduction for Competitive Supply Chains under the Cap-and-Trading Scheme

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价