基于制造商生产成本扰动的不同主导权下供应链脆弱性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2021.06.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了定量研究生产成本扰动和不同权利结构下的供应链脆弱性，分别构建集中决策、制造商主导和零售商主导的线上线下双渠道供应链和直销供应链两种供应链博弈模型。采用使供应链最优决策保持不变的制造商生产成本扰动区间长度来衡量供应链脆弱性的大小，区间长度越大，供应链脆弱性越小。结果表明：1)对线上线下双渠道供应链而言，集中决策和制造商主导时的成本扰动区间长度相等，即脆弱性相同，且大于零售商主导时的脆弱性；2)对直销供应链而言，制造商主导时的成本扰动区间长度大于集中决策时的区间长度，即制造商主导时的供应链脆弱性小于集中决策时的脆弱性，而零售商主导时脆弱性的大小与参数β、k有关。最后通过数值仿真验证了该方法的可行性。

关键词: 供应链, 脆弱性, 博弈论, 权力结构, 成本扰动

Abstract: For a quantitative research on the vulnerability of supply chain under the disturbance of production cost and different power structures, two supply chain game models of centralized decision-making, manufacturer-led and retailer-led online and offline dual-channel supply chain and direct channel supply chain were constructed. The length of the manufacturer’s production cost disturbance interval which keeps the optimal decision of supply chain unchanged was used to measure the vulnerability of supply chain and the larger the interval length was, the smaller the vulnerability of supply chain was. The results show that: 1) for online and offline dual-channel supply chain, the length of the cost disturbance interval is equal to that of the centralized decision-making and is manufacturer-dominated, that is, they have the same vulnerability but it is greater than the retailer-dominated vulnerability; 2) for the direct supply chain, the length of the manufacturer-dominated cost disturbance interval is greater than the centralized decision, that is, the manufacturer-dominated supply chain vulnerability is less than in the centralized decision, while the size of retailer-dominated supply chain vulnerability is related to the parameters β and k. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed method is verified by numerical simulations.

Key words: supply chain, vulnerability, game theory, power structure, cost disturbance

中图分类号:

F274

张萌萌, 闫秀霞, 董友衡. 基于制造商生产成本扰动的不同主导权下供应链脆弱性研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(6): 123-131,149.

ZHANG Mengmeng, YAN Xiuxia, DONG Youheng. A Research on Supply Chain Vulnerability under Different Dominance Based on the Manufacturer's Production Cost Disturbance[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2021, 24(6): 123-131,149.

参考文献

[1] 于鲲鹏. 生产型供应链脆弱性若干关键问题研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2013.
YU Kunpeng. Research on some key problems of vulnerability in manufacturing supply chain[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2013.
[2] SVENSSON G. A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chain[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution &Logistics Management, 2000, 30(9): 731-749
[3] WAGNER S M, BODE C. An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2007, 12(6): 301-312
[4] PECK H. Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management[J]. International Journal of Logistics Rresearch and Applications, 2006, 9(2): 127-142
[5] 宁钟. 供应链脆弱性的影响因素及其管理原则[J]. 中国流通经济, 2004, 18(4): 13-16
NING Zhong. On the fragility of supply chains and supply chains management principles[J]. China Business and Market, 2004, 18(4): 13-16
[6] CHEN Liwei, DUI Hongyan, ZHANG Chi. A resilience measure for supply chain systems considering the interruption with the cyber-physical systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 199: 106869
[7] HOSSEINI S, BARKER K. Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks: a case study of inland waterway ports[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 93: 252-266
[8] 张小玲, 陆强. 供应链中断下顾客缺货反应对牛鞭效应的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(7): 54-62
ZHANG Xiaoling, LU Qiang. Impact of customer response to stock-out on bullwhip effect: under supply chain disruption[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(7): 54-62
[9] 杨天剑, 武兵, 李主贺. 三种由零售商主导的双渠道供应链结构在生产成本扰动下的鲁棒性比较[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(3): 846-858
YANG Tianjian, WU Bing, LI Zhuhe. Robustness comparison of three dual-channel supply chain structures under production cost disruptions[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2016, 22(3): 846-858
[10] 孙自来, 王旭坪, 阮俊虎. 不同权力结构对制造商双渠道供应链的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 106-114
SUN Zilai, WANG Xuping, RUAN Junhu, et al. Impact of different game power structures on the manufacturer dual-channel supply chain[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(9): 106-114
[11] 隋博文, 谭翔. 跨境农产品供应链脆弱性的影响因素——基于中国—东盟的实证分析[J]. 中国流通经济, 2019, 33(6): 66-73
SUI Bowen, TAN Xiang. Research on the influencing factors of cross-border agri-food supply chains vulnerability——based on the empirical analysis between China and Asean[J]. China Business and Market, 2019, 33(6): 66-73
[12] 张秀萍. 供应链脆弱性研究评述[J]. 中国流通经济, 2012, 26(3): 35-38
ZHANG Xiuping. Review of supply chain vulnerability studies[J]. China Business and Market, 2012, 26(3): 35-38
[13] 刘佳, 史丽伟. 基于贝叶斯网络的港口煤炭供应链脆弱性研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2016(10): 7-15
LIU Jia, SHI Liwei. The research of vulnerability for sea port coal supply chain based on Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2016(10): 7-15
[14] WAGNER S M, NESHAT N. Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 126(1): 121-129
[15] 史丽萍, 刘强, 李静媛. 制造业供应链伙伴间态度性承诺对供应链脆弱性作用机制[J]. 管理科学, 2014, 27(5): 35-49
SHI Liping, Liu Qiang, Li Jingyuan. Function mechanism of supply chain partners attitudinal commitment of manufacturing industry on supply chain vulnerability[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2014, 27(5): 35-49
[16] 张学森, 汪刘凯, 李慧宗. 绿色供应链脆弱性风险传播机制研究[J]. 财贸研究, 2017, 28(3): 104-109
ZHANG Xuesen, WANG Liukai, LI Huizong, et al. Transmission path about risk factors of vulnerability of green supply chain[J]. Finance and Trade Research, 2017, 28(3): 104-109
[17] 段鹰, 刘红, 朱祥文. 基于企业地位不平等的供应链脆弱性分析[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(1): 208-213
DUAN Ying, LIU Hong, ZHU Xiangwen. Vulnerability of supply chain based on inequality of firm status[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2019, 25(1): 208-213
[18] 张军. 网络舆情时变演化机制及应对策略研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2020.
[19] PAN K, LAI K K, LIANG L, et al. Two-period pricing and ordering policy for the dominant retailer in a two-echelon supply chain with demand uncertainty[J]. Omega, 2008, 37(4): 919-929