混合回收下逆向供应链主导模式和物流模式决策

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前关于不同物流服务模式和主导模式的研究均是在单一回收渠道的假设下进行的，少有针对混合回收模式进行相关研究。为此，构建模型，运用博弈论方法求解。比较发现如下。1) 企业定价决策、物流策略以及逆向供应链系统的稳定性均与物流自营再制造节约成本和物流外包再制造节约成本间的比值T有关。2) 制造商和销售商都视自己主导的逆向供应链系统为最优选择，但其主导模式对应物流策略的选择却各不相同。当T值较小时，主导企业均倾向于物流外包策略；当T值较大时，主导企业均倾向于物流自营策略；当T值适中时，主导模式不同，对应物流策略的选择也不尽相同。3) 无论谁为主导企业，当T值较大或较小时，制造商和销售商易达成长期合作，两种物流模式对应的逆向供应链系统均具有较高稳定性；当T值适中时，两者合作可能性最低，即使双方促成合作，该逆向供应链系统也极不稳定。

关键词: 逆向供应链, 博弈论, 主导模式, 物流策略

Abstract: At present, the research on different logistics service modes and dominant modes is under the assumption of a single recycling channel, and there are few related studies on the mixed recycling mode. For this reason, through the construction of models, using game theory to solve and conducting a comparative analysis, it is found the following results. 1) Enterprise pricing decisions, logistics strategies and the stability of reverse supply chain system are all related to the ratio T of cost savings from remanufacturing between self-logistics and logistics outsourcing. 2) Both manufacturers and retailers regard their leading reverse supply chain system as the optimal choice, but the choices of the corresponding logistics strategies are different. When the value of T is small, the leading enterprises tend to logistics outsourcing strategies; when the value of T is large, the leading enterprises prefer self-logistics strategies; when the value of T is moderate, the choice of corresponding logistics strategies are different according to the dominant modes. 3) No matter who is the leading enterprise, when the value of T is large or small, it is easy for manufacturers and retailers to form cooperation, and the reverse supply chain system corresponding to the two logistics models has high stability; when the value of T is moderate, the possibility of cooperation between the two is the lowest, and even if the two sides form cooperation, the reverse supply chain system is also extremely unstable.

Key words: reverse supply chain, game theory, dominant mode, logistics strategy

中图分类号:

F274

公彦德, 杨君歆. 混合回收下逆向供应链主导模式和物流模式决策[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(2): 42-49.

GONG Yande, YANG Junxin. Decision-making of Dominant Mode and Logistics Mode for Reverse Supply Chain under Mixed Recycling[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(2): 42-49.

参考文献

[1] 公彦德, 达庆利. 闭环供应链主导模式与物流模式的组合研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(10): 14-25
GONG Yande, DA Qingli. Research on combinations of closed-loop supply chain dominant mode and logistics mode[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, 18(10): 14-25
[2] ZHANG Rong, LIU Bin, WANG Wenliang. Pricing decisions in a dual channels system with different power structures[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 29: 523-533
[3] GAO Juhong, HAN Hongshuai, HOU Liting, et al. Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 2043-2057
[4] 王玉燕, 李璟. 公平关切下基于网络平台销售、回收的E-闭环供应链的主导模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 139-151
WANG Yuyan, LI Jing. Research on dominant models of E-CLSC based on network sale and recycle considering fairness concern[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1): 139-151
[5] 公彦德, 李帮义. 主导模式对供应链决策、稳定性和效率的影响分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(3): 42-49
GONG Yande, LI Bangyi. Analysis of supply chain decision, stability and efficiency based on dominant mode[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2012, 26(3): 42-49
[6] WANG Wenbin, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Kai, et al. Reward–penalty mechanism for closed-loop supply chains under responsibility-sharing and different power structures[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 170: 178-190
[7] TANAI Y. Capturing value from decentralized supply chain with third party reverse logistics[D]. USA: Kent State University, 2016.
[8] AMEKNASSI L, A?T-KADI D, REZ G. Integration of logistics outsourcing decisions in a green supply chain design: a stochastic multi-objective multi-period multi-product programming model[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 182: 165-184
[9] 杨丽, 张旭凤, 温卫娟. 不同权力结构和物流策略对供应链决策的影响[J]. 中国流通经济, 2019, 33(8): 63-71
YANG Li, ZHANG Xufeng, WEN Weijuan. Research on influence of different power structure and logistics strategy on supply chain decision[J]. China Business and Market, 2019, 33(8): 63-71
[10] 公彦德, 王媛. 考虑拆解补贴分配的闭环供应链物流服务偏好研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2019, 38(3): 36-45
GONG Yande, WANG Yuan. Research on logistics service preference of closed-loop supply chain considering distribution of dismantling subsidy[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2019, 38(3): 36-45
[11] 马祖军, 胡书, 代颖. 政府规制下混合渠道销售/回收的电器电子产品闭环供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1): 82-90
MA Zujun, HU Shu, DAI Ying. Decision models for a closed-loop supply chain with hybrid sale/collection channels for electrical and electronic equipment under government regulations[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(1): 82-90
[12] 董乾东, 李敏, 姜素红. 基于产品质量差异的闭环供应链混合回收模式[J]. 系统工程, 2017, 35(2): 116-121
DONG Qiandong, LI Min, JIANG Suhong. Hybrid recovery mode of closed-loop supply chain based on product quality differentiation[J]. Systems Engineering, 2017, 35(2): 116-121
[13] TALEIZADEH A A, MOSHTAGH M S, MOON I. Pricing, product quality, and collection optimization in a decentralized closed-loop supply chain with different channel structures: game theoretical approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 189: 406-431
[14] 公彦德, 蒋雨薇. 闭环供应链混合回收模式定价及渠道选择研究[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(5): 127-131
GONG Yande, JIANG Yuwei. Research on pricing and channel selection of hybrid recycling mode in closed-loop supply chain[J]. Soft Science, 2018, 32(5): 127-131
[15] GIRI B C, DEY S K. Game theoretic analysis of a closed-loop supply chain with backup supplier under dual channel recycling[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 129: 179-191
[16] YUAN Yanhong, YANG Jinyao, LI Yang, et al. Necessary conditions for coordination of dual-channel closed-loop supply chain [J/OL].(2020-11-19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore. 2019.119823.