基于系统动力学的电煤供应链节能减排路径仿真分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.03.005

工业工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 39-46,94.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.03.005

基于系统动力学的电煤供应链节能减排路径仿真分析

贺勇, 卫岂伦, 廖诺

广东工业大学管理学院，广东广州 510520

收稿日期:2020-12-21 发布日期:2022-07-06
通讯作者: 廖诺(1981—)，女，贵州省人，教授，博士，主要研究方向为管理系统工程、能源经济与管理。 E-mail：laura.first@163.com E-mail:laura.first@163.com
作者简介:贺勇(1982—)，男，湖北省人，教授，博士，主要研究方向为生产系统优化、能源经济与管理
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71974038)；教育部社科规划基金资助项目(21YJAZH048)；广东省基础与应用基础研究基金资助项目(2022A1515010758)；广东省哲学社科规划基金资助项目(GD18CGL10)

Path Simulation and Analysis of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Electric-coal Supply Chain Based on System Dynamics

HE Yong, WEI Qilun, LIAO Nuo

School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China

Received:2020-12-21 Published:2022-07-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为分析不同节能减排路径对能源消耗和碳排放的影响，从经济、能源和环境等系统要素出发，构建电煤供应链节能减排系统动力学模型。以神华集团为例，确定模型参数及主要方程，分析链上各环节的能源消耗、碳排放及节能减排路径，动态仿真不同路径的节能减排效果。结果表明，发电环节节能减排潜力大于其他环节；降低燃煤机组发电标准煤耗率，提高铁路运输在煤炭运输中的比重，降低煤炭开采过程中的耗电系数，增加环保治理投资，是电煤供应链节能减排的有效途径；不同路径的节能减排效果存在差异，其中降低发电标准煤耗率对节能减排产生的效果最为明显。

关键词: 节能减排, 电煤供应链, 系统动力学, 动态仿真

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of different paths of energy-conservation and emission-reduction in electric-coal supply chain, a systematic model is constructed to simulate the energy-conservation and emission-reduction system, considering the economy, energy and environment goals. Taking Shen Hua Group as a case study, first, the parameters and main equations are determined, and the energy consumption, carbon emissions and the path of energy saving and emission reduction are analyzed, and the energy saving and emission reduction effects of different paths are simulated through the system dynamics model. The findings of this study include as follows: at first, the potential for energy saving and emission reduction in process of power generation is greater than other processes; secondly, reducing the standard coal consumption rate of coal-fired units, increasing the proportion of railway transportation in coal transportation, reducing the power consumption coefficient in coal mining, and increasing the investment in environmental protection treatment are effective ways to save energy and reduce emission in the electric-coal supply chain; third, there are differences in energy saving and emission reduction effects of different paths, and reducing the standard coal consumption rate of power generation has the most obvious effect on energy saving and emission reduction.

Key words: energy saving and emissions reduction, electric-coal supply chain, system dynamics, dynamic simulation

中图分类号:

N941

贺勇, 卫岂伦, 廖诺. 基于系统动力学的电煤供应链节能减排路径仿真分析[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(3): 39-46,94.

HE Yong, WEI Qilun, LIAO Nuo. Path Simulation and Analysis of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Electric-coal Supply Chain Based on System Dynamics[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(3): 39-46,94.

参考文献

[1] 赵道致, 原白云, 徐春秋. 低碳环境下供应链纵向减排合作的动态协调策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1): 147-154
ZHAO Daozhi, YUAN Baiyun, XU Chunqiu. Dynamic coordination strategy of vertical cooperative on carbon emission reduction in supply chain under low-carbon era[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016, 30(1): 147-154
[2] 姜海洋. 促进发电环节节能减排的煤电产业链合作优化模型[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2010.
JIANG Haiyang. The optimal model for coal and electric power chain cooperation to promote the power generation sector's energy conservation and emission reduction[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2010.
[3] 廖诺, 赵亚莉, 贺勇, 等. 碳交易政策对电煤供应链利润及碳排放量影响的仿真分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 154-163
LIAO Nuo, ZHAO Yali, HE Yong, et al. Effects of carbon trading policies on profit and carbon emission of electric-coal supply chain based on simulation analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(8): 154-163
[4] 张金良, 袁伟伟. 不同政策工具对发电企业碳减排的影响路径[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(4): 24-30
ZHANG Jinliang, YUAN Weiwei. The influence path of different policy instruments for carbon emission reduction in power generation enterprises[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Sciences), 2017(4): 24-30
[5] 杨勇波, 陈缨, 羊静, 等. 耗能企业节能减排政策模拟推演[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016(4): 972-978.
YANG Yongbo, CHEN Ying, YANG Jing, et al. Energy conservation and emission reduction policy simulation about energy-consuming enterprises[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016(4): 972-978.
[6] 王众, 骆毓燕, 冯浩轩, 等. 碳减排环境下我国电力企业发电技术投资组合研究[J]. 科学决策, 2015, 9: 15-32
WANG Zhong, LUO Yuyan, FENG Haoxuan, et al. Generation technology portfolio optimization for China's electricity enterprise in the condition of carbon mitigation[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2015, 9: 15-32
[7] YU S, ZHENG S, GAO S, et al. A multi-objective decision model for investment in energy savings and emission reductions in coal mining[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 260(1): 335-347
[8] 张新华, 卢灿华, 陈志伟. 碳调度模式下火力发电商的碳减排投资策略分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 179-188
ZHANG Xinhua, LU Canhua, CHEN Zhiwei. Analysis on carbon abatement investment strategy for thermal power generation-gompanies in carbon dispatching mole[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(11): 179-188
[9] 王芹鹏, 赵道致, 何龙飞. 供应链企业碳减排投资策略选择与行为演化研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2014, 28(3): 181-189
WANG Qinpeng, ZHAO Daozhi, HE Longfei. Strategies selection and behavioral evolution of carbon-emission-reduction investment in supply chain firms[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2014, 28(3): 181-189
[10] CAO Y, ZHAO Y, WEN L, et al. System dynamics simulation for CO2 emission mitigation in green electric-coal supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 232: 759-773
[11] DA B, LIU C, LIU N, et al. Coal-electric power supply chain reduction and operation strategy under the cap-and-trade model and green financial background[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(11): 3021
[12] XU J, MA N, XIE H. Ecological coal mining based dynamic equilibrium strategy to reduce pollution emissions and energy consumption[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 514-529
[13] 于华. 煤炭供应链排放测算与控制研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2011.
YU Hua. Research on assessment and control of carbon emissions for the coal supply chain[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.
[14] 姜庆国. 电煤供应链碳排放全过程仿真研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2013.
JIANG Qingguo. Research on the process and measurement of electric-coal supply chain carbon emissions[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013.
[15] 唐丽敏, 王盼, 王成武. 基于系统动力学的道路运输节能减排路径模拟[J]. 系统工程, 2018, 36(6): 71-78
TANG Limin, WANG Pan, WANG Chengwu. The path simulation of energy saving and emission reduction of road transportation based on system dynamics[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018, 36(6): 71-78

基于系统动力学的电煤供应链节能减排路径仿真分析

Path Simulation and Analysis of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Electric-coal Supply Chain Based on System Dynamics

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李晓华, 邵举平, 孙延安. 基于SD及三方博弈的低碳供应链消费市场活力激发研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 150-159.
[2]	李俊亭, 郑明珠, 赛云秀. 施工作业人员不安全行为干预策略仿真研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 111-116.
[3]	李锋, 余菡. 模仿创新企业进入时机和动态定价联合决策问题研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(5): 11-21,95.
[4]	刘娇, 杨敬江. 基于知识协同的联盟企业创新绩效系统动力学模型构建与分析[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(5): 132-139.
[5]	薛朝改, 周马玲, 曹武军. 基于系统动力学的跨境电商生态系统动力机制研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(4): 84-92.
[6]	李锋, 余菡. 双寡头竞争环境下消费者行为对创新产品销售影响的仿真分析[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(6): 8-16,26.
[7]	孟秀丽, 孟新. 基于系统动力学的乳制品冷链库存与终端收益仿真[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 1-8.
[8]	周金华, 朱建军, 刘小弟. 行业诚信体系建设的系统动力学仿真分析及政策建议[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 9-21.
[9]	石园, 曹磊, 张智勇, 张婷. 基于系统动力学的集群式社区养老服务供应链跨链协作模型[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(6): 31-38.
[10]	代峰, 戴伟. 基于系统动力学的城市生活垃圾发电进化博弈[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(1): 1-11.
[11]	何国光1,2, 李树刚1. 基于系统动力学仿真的医疗资源配置[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(2): 121-127.
[12]	史慧1, 杨勇1，2. 供应链相关契约仿真的预付账款融资模型[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(4): 79-84.
[13]	屈挺，陈艳，王宗忠，陈新度，戴青云，黄国全. 制造物联网系统动力学建模与分析[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(3): 1-09.
[14]	陈震1，徐丽萍2. 碳政策下货运企业运营成本比较分析[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(3): 55-62.
[15]	王虹森，贾素玲，闫志华. 基于仿真的三级供应链成本优化[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(2): 51-58.