考虑横向和纵向差异的供应商渠道入侵策略研究

    Research on Supplier Channel Encroachment Strategy Considering Horizontal and Vertical Differences

    • 摘要: 随着电子商务的迅猛发展,供应商入侵所引发的渠道冲突日益显著。本文研究产品质量存在横向和纵向差异的供应商渠道入侵策略问题,考虑产品质量设计成本,构建4种Stackelberg供应商入侵模型:无入侵、横向差异化入侵、纵向差异化入侵和横纵向差异化入侵;通过逆向求解法分析不同情形下各方的均衡结果及最优策略,揭示产品质量设计成本对供应商入侵策略选择的影响。结果表明,纵向、横纵向均有可能成为最优入侵策略,且入侵策略与产品质量设计成本密切相关;质量设计成本不同,入侵策略不同,但差异化入侵并不是总是最优选择,供应商仅在其直销渠道利润达到某一临界值时才会选择入侵。因此,供应商应根据不同的产品质量设计成本合理制定入侵策略,在差异化入侵策略下,供应商和零售商可能会实现双赢的局面。

       

      Abstract: This research investigates supplier channel encroachment strategies under conditions of horizontal and vertical quality differentiation, incorporating product quality design costs. Four Stackelberg supplier encroachment models are proposed: no encroachment, horizontal differentiation encroachment, vertical differentiation encroachment, and combined horizontal and vertical differentiation encroachment. Using inverse solving methods, the equilibrium outcomes and optimal strategies for each participant are analyzed across different scenarios, revealing how product quality design costs affect supplier behavior. Results show that horizontal, vertical, or combined differentiation can be optimal strategies, with suppliers adopting differentiation encroachment only when their direct sales channel profits exceed a threshold. Furthermore, differentiation encroachment is not always the best approach; the choice of strategy depends on the product quality design costs, with suppliers adjusting their strategies accordingly. Under differentiation encroachment, mutually beneficial outcomes for both suppliers and retailers may also be achievable.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回