资金约束下基于银行绿色金融的低碳供应链主体合谋行为研究

    Research on Collusion Behavior of Low Carbon Supply Chain Entities Based on Bank Green Finance under Financial Constraints

    • 摘要: 为探究绿色金融背景下存在资金约束的低碳供应链企业的合谋骗贷行为,构建了银行、核心企业和中小企业的三方博弈模型,剖析了低碳供应链中核心企业和中小企业合谋骗取银行绿色信贷的关键影响因素,并分析了银行监管成本、监管成功率、合谋惩罚程度等对供应链企业合谋决策以及银行监管策略的影响。研究发现:企业合谋的“易操作性”和“隐蔽性”以及银行对合谋的监管成本、惩罚力度等是影响低碳供应链企业合谋行为的关键因素;随着银行监管成本的不断提高,银行监管动机和力度减弱,企业进行合谋的概率不断增大;当银行的绿色借贷利率相对较高时,即银行绿色借贷利率与普通借贷利率值相差越来越小时,企业合谋概率增大;银行通过对新兴技术的投资和建设,形成高效的监管能力(即较高的监管成功率),并通过强化对企业合谋行为的惩罚力度,能够有效威慑企业合谋行为,降低企业合谋动机和合谋概率。

       

      Abstract: To explore the collusion and loan fraud behavior of low-carbon supply chain enterprises with financial constraints in the context of green finance, a tripartite game model was constructed between banks, core enterprises, and small and medium-sized enterprises. The key influencing factors of core enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises colluding to defraud green loans from banks in low-carbon supply chains were analyzed, and the impact of bank regulatory costs, regulatory success rates, and collusion punishment levels on supply chain enterprise collusion decisions and bank regulatory strategies was analyzed. Research has found that the “ease of operation” and “concealment” of collusion among enterprises, as well as the regulatory costs and punishment severity imposed by banks on collusion, are key factors influencing collusion behavior among enterprises in the low-carbon supply chain; With the continuous increase in the cost of banking supervision, the motivation and intensity of banking supervision have weakened, and the probability of collusion among enterprises continues to increase; When the green lending rate of a bank is relatively high, that is, when the difference between the bank's green lending rate and the ordinary lending rate becomes smaller and smaller, the probability of collusion among enterprises increases; By investing in and constructing emerging technologies, banks can form efficient regulatory capabilities (i.e., higher regulatory success rates), and by strengthening the punishment for corporate collusion, they can effectively deter corporate collusion and reduce the motivation and probability of collusion.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回