基于扩展VIKOR的汽车产品质量经济性评价模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2018.04.007

工业工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 51-61.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2018.04.007

基于扩展VIKOR的汽车产品质量经济性评价模型

周福礼¹, 代应², 王旭³, 张胜男⁴

1. 郑州轻工业学院经济与管理学院, 河南郑州 450002;
2. 重庆理工大学管理学院, 重庆 400050;
3. 重庆大学机械工程学院及自主品牌汽车协同创新中心, 重庆 400044;
4. 长安福特汽车有限公司, 重庆 401120

收稿日期:2018-03-10 出版日期:2018-08-30 发布日期:2018-08-27
作者简介:周福礼(1991-),男,河南省人,讲师,主要研究方向为汽车质量管理、工业工程及可持续供应链.
基金资助:
重庆市重点产业共性关键技术创新专项资助项目（CSTC2015ZDCY-ZTZX60009）；中央高校基金资助项目（106112016CDJXZ338825）；重庆市科委重大项目资助（cstc2015yykfC60002）

Comprehensive Economy of Quality Evaluation Model Using Extended VIKOR Approach for Automobile Products

ZHOU Fuli¹, DAI Ying², WANG Xu³, ZHANG Shengnan⁴

1. School of Economics & Management, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
2. School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400050, China;
3. School of Mechanical Engineering and Chongqing Automotive Collaborative Innovation Center, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
4. Chang'an Ford Automobile Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401120, China

Received:2018-03-10 Online:2018-08-30 Published:2018-08-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对复杂汽车产品质量难以量化及质量排名参差不齐的问题，综合考虑产品质量、售后服务和包含油耗、使用成本的总拥有成本等质量经济性指标，提出基于扩展VIKOR方法的汽车质量经济性综合评价模型，辅助消费者购买决策。由于评价信息多源和指标主观不确定，引入数值型、区间型及语言变量等混合类型指标量化方法；利用粗糙集属性约简删除冗余指标，确定关键影响因素，并计算熵权；通过构建混合指标欧氏距离公式和VIKOR多属性决策，得出基于综合效用值的多属性约束下的满意妥协解。案例分析验证本文模型能在消费者购车时实现智能推荐，对比是否考虑总拥有成本前后的推荐结果，可知：在不考虑使用成本情景下倾向于推荐价格便宜的产品；而在考虑使用成本等隐形损失情景下推荐高性价比的车型，更加符合购车消费者的实际情形。

关键词: 汽车产品, 服务质量, 总拥有成本, 质量经济性, 扩展VIKOR方法

Abstract: Faced with the difficulty of automobile quality and chaotic rankings of vehicles, a comprehensive evaluation model on economy of quality of automobile using extended VIKOR is developed to assist car consumers in decision-making of purchasing. The economy of quality indexes including product quality, after-sales quality and total ownership cost are addressed. Due to multiple sources of evaluation information and uncertainty of certain indexes, the mixed types of indexes including crisp value, interval number and linguistic variables are introduced to the evaluation framework. The rough set-based attribute reduction technique is employed to delete the redundant criteria, which facilitates key indexes establishment. According to the European distance analysis for mixed indexes, the anti-entropy-based technique is used to obtain criteria weights, and the best vehicle alternative is recommended with the minimum group utility value. The case study verifies that the proposed method contributes to intelligent recommendation for vehicle consumers. A comparative analysis indicates that car users tend to select cheaper vehicles without considering operation cost. However, when taking the total ownership cost into account, they prefer to choose vehicles with top priority concerning economy of quality rather than cheap ones, which caters to practical scenarios.

Key words: automobile product, service quality, total ownership cost, economy of quality, extended VIKOR

中图分类号:

周福礼, 代应, 王旭, 张胜男. 基于扩展VIKOR的汽车产品质量经济性评价模型[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(4): 51-61.

ZHOU Fuli, DAI Ying, WANG Xu, ZHANG Shengnan. Comprehensive Economy of Quality Evaluation Model Using Extended VIKOR Approach for Automobile Products[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2018, 21(4): 51-61.

参考文献

[1] ZHOU F, WANG X, LIN Y, et al. Strategic part prioritization for quality improvement practice using a hybrid MCDM framework:a case application in an auto factory[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(6):559-582
[2] JURAN J M, GODFREY A B. Quality handbook[M]. New York:Republished McGraw-Hill, 1999
[3] GUAJARDO J A, COHEN M A, NETESSINE S. Service competition and product quality in the U. S. automobile industry[J]. Management Science, 2016, 62(7):1860-1877
[4] 鹿应荣, 李显生, 王云鹏, 等. 国产汽车的整车可靠性评价[J]. 汽车工程, 2001, 23(2):106-109 LU Yingrong, LI Xiansheng, WANG Yunpeng, et al. Reliability evaluation of domestic trucks[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2001, 23(2):106-109
[5] 宋年秀, 王吉忠. 大修汽车可靠性的综合评价与故障分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 1999, 30(2):89-94 SONG Nianxiu, WANG Jizhong. Overall evaluation of major overhauled automobile reliability and fault analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1999, 30(2):89-94
[6] 王化吉, 宗长富, 管欣, 等. 基于模糊层次分析法的汽车操纵稳定性主观评价指标权重确定方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2011, 47(24):83-90 WANG Huaji, ZONG Changfu, GUANG Xin, et al. Method of determining weights of subjective evaluation indexes for car handling and stability based on fuzzy analytic hierarchyprocess[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(24):83-90
[7] 刑如飞, 管欣, 田承伟, 等. 汽车操纵稳定性主观评价指标权重确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2009(s1):33-38 XING Rufei, GUAN Xin, TIAN Chengwei, et al. Weight of subjective evaluation indexes for car handling and stability[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2009(s1):33-38
[8] CHANG P C, CHUANG C L, CHUANG W C, et al. An examination of the effects of quality on customer loyalty:the automobile industry in Taiwan[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2015, 26(1-2):203-217
[9] 陈力华, 杨亚莉. 基于GAP模型的轿车售后服务质量评价研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2011, 33(1):85-90 CHEN Lihua, YANG Yali. A study on the evaluation of car post-sale service quality based on GAP model[J]. Automobile Engineering, 2011, 33(1):85-90
[10] 陈明, 郭立新. 基于AHP-熵权-TOPSIS的电动汽车动力性经济性综合评价方法[J]. 机械设计, 2013, 30(4):15-19 CHEN Ming, GUO Lixin. Comprehensive evaluation of power performance and energy consumption economy of battery electric vehicle based on AHP-entropy-TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2013, 30(4):15-19
[11] 何煦, 张建武, 鲁统利. 汽车动力性与燃油经济性模拟仿真与传动系参数优化设计[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2008(3):1-3 HE Xu, ZHANG Jianwu, LU Tongli. Computer simulation of power performance and fuel economy and optimization of transmission parameter of automobile[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2008(3):1-3
[12] 王献雨, 鞠晓峰. 基于DEA模型的大型复杂军工产品质量经济性评价[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(3):552-556 WANG Xianyu, JU Xiaofeng. Evaluation of quality economic rules of large-scale and complex military products based on DEA[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(3):552-556
[13] SNIESKA V, DAUNORIENE A, ZEKEVICIENE A. Hidden costs in the evaluation of quality failure costs[J]. Engineering Economics, 2013, 24(3):176-186
[14] MURTHY D P, BLISCHKE W R. Warranty management and product manufacture[M]. USA:Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
[15] LEONG L Y, HEW T S, LEE V H, et al. An SEM-artificial-neural-network analysis of the relationships between SERVPERF, customer satisfaction and loyalty among low-cost and full-service airline[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(19):6620-6634
[16] 周福礼, 王旭, 林云, 等. 基于F-VIKOR的质量改善部件优先级确定[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(12):2809-2818 ZHOU Fuli, WANG Xu, LIN Yun, et al. Priority establishment of quality improvement procedure part based on fuzzy-VIKOR method[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2016, 22(12):2809-2818
[17] ATANASSOV K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1986, 20(1):87-96
[18] ZHANG Shifang, LIU Sanyang. A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9):11401-11405
[19] JACK N, ISKANDAR B P, MURTHY D N P. A repair-replace strategy based on usage rate for items sold with a two-dimensional warranty[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(2):611-617
[20] TONG S. Interval number and fuzzy number linear programmings[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1994, 66(3):301-306
[21] SZMIDT E, KACPRZYK J, BUJNOWSKI P. How to measure the amount of knowledge conveyed by Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 257:276-285
[22] ZHOU F, LIN Y, WANG X, et al. ELV recycling service provider selection using the hybrid MCDM method:a case application in China[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(5):482-496
[23] ZHOU Fuli, WANG Xu, SAMVEDI Avinash. Quality improvement pilot program selection based on dynamic hybrid MCDM approach[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2018, 118(1):144-163

基于扩展VIKOR的汽车产品质量经济性评价模型

Comprehensive Economy of Quality Evaluation Model Using Extended VIKOR Approach for Automobile Products

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孔祥芬, 陈鹏. 改进的Kano模型和IPA模型的综合应用探索——以民航航班延误服务为例[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(3): 9-14.
[2]	张智勇，吕嘉欣，石永强. 基于奖惩契约的养老服务供应链质量控制协调[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(5): 58-64.
[3]	张重阳1，樊治平1，于超1，徐皓2. 考虑顾客给出服务期望容忍区间的服务质量评价方法[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(2): 88-94.
[4]	朱永坤，明新国，李国明. 基于GIOWA算子的备件服务绩效评价方法[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(6): 141-146.
[5]	韩亚娟1，谢会2. 产品服务系统中价格、质量竞争下的最优决策[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(4): 18-23.
[6]	陶然, 徐哲. 基于SERVQUAL的专业体检机构服务质量测量[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(4): 103-110.
[7]	杜学美，张倩，苏强. 基于服务蓝图的网上零售业感知服务质量[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(1): 19-24.
[8]	韩亚娟，谢会. 餐饮服务排队管理中等候区设置必要性研究[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(6): 20-24.