非对称风险态度下的企业间知识转移效果研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了最优化存在知识流失风险的企业间知识转移效果，分析了受双方信任程度影响的知识发送方风险态度披露决策和知识接收方信息处理决策，及其对知识转移的影响，探讨了政府应如何促进知识转移效果最优，并用算例验证了结论。研究表明风险厌恶方和知识接收方会积极最优化知识转移效果；风险厌恶方期望收益比风险偏好方高时，知识转移效果较易最优化；政府应制定政策调整知识发送方索要的赔偿金及监督成本，促进知识转移效果最优。

关键词: 知识转移, 风险态度, 信息不对称, 信任程度

Abstract:

In order to optimize the effect of knowledge transfer between enterprises with risks of knowledge loss, the influences of both the information disclosure strategy of the knowledge sender and the information processing strategy of the knowledge accepter on knowledge transfer when the degrees of trust between both sides are different are analyzed, and the way of the government to optimize the effect of knowledge transfer between enterprises is found. The conclusions are illustrated by numerical simulations. The results show that the risk aversion party and the knowledge accepter will positively optimize the effect of knowledge transfer; that the higher the expected revenue of the risk aversion party than that of the risk preference party, the more easily the effect of knowledge transfer can be optimized; and that the government can improve the probability of optimizing the effect of knowledge transfer by formulating appropriate policies to adjust the compensation demanded by the knowledge sender and its monitoring cost.

Key words: knowledge transfer, risk attitude, information asymmetry, degree of trust

陈果，齐二石. 非对称风险态度下的企业间知识转移效果研究[J]. 工业工程.

CHEN Guo, QI Ershi. The Effect of Knowledge Transfer Between Enterprises under Asymmetric Risk Attitude[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal .

参考文献

［1］NORMAN P M.Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: Resource and relational characteristics［J］.Journal of High Technology Management Research,2002,13(2):177-202.
［2］刁丽琳,朱桂龙,许治.R&D合作中知识窃取和知识保护的博弈分析［J］.科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(4): 80-88.
DIAO Lilin, ZHU Guilong, XU Zhi.The game theoretical analysis on knowledge appropriation and knowledge protection in R&D cooperation［J］.Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2012,33(4):80-88. 
［3］QUINTAS P, LEFRERE P, JONES G.Knowledge management: a strategic agenda［J］.Long Range Planning,1997,30(3): 385-391.
［4］HAMEL G.-Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances［J］. Strategic Management Journal,1991,12(4):83-103. 
［5］HAGEDOORN J.-Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences［J］.Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(5):371-385. 
［6］WEBER E U, MIILIMAN R A.Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice［J］.Management Science,1997,43(2):123-144.
［7］GOLDSTEIN W M, EINHORN H J.Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomenal［J］.Psychological Review, 1987,94(2):236-254. 
［8］KIM H J, REINSCHMIDT K F.Effects of contractors′ risk attitude on competition in construction［J］.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2011,137(4): 275-283. 
［9］杜建国,万亚红,侯云章.基于供应链成员风险态度的行为演化［J］.系统管理学报,2013,22(6):828-834,840.
DU Jianguo, WAN Yahong, Hou Yunzhang.Study on behavior evolution based on the risk attitude of the supply chain members［J］.Journal of Systems & Management,2013,22(6): 828-834,840.
［10］张道海,杜建国.基于零售商风险态度的供应中断风险管理研究［J］.系统科学与数学,2011,31(10): 1279-1287.
ZHANG Daohai, DU Jianguo. Study on supply disruption risks management based on retailer′s risk attitude［J］.Journal of System Science and Mathematical Science, 2011,31(10): 1279-1287. 
［11］包兴,孙琦.管理者风险态度对系统能力受损后的应急采购决策影响研究［J］.中国管理科学,2012,20(2): 87-92. 
BAO Xing, SUN Qi.The influence of manager′s risk attitude to procurement decision when system′s capacity was partially injured［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2012,20(2): 87-92.
［12］包兴,季建华.考虑管理者风险态度的大型服务运作系统能力应急管理［J］.系统管理学报,2009,18(5): 555-561.
BAO Xing, JI Jianhua.Disrupting capacity management of service operation system under decisionmaker′s risk attitude［J］.Journal of Systems & Management,2009, 18(5):555-561.
［13］GIANNOCCARO I, PONTRANDOLFO P.Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts［J］. International Journal of Production Economics,2004,89(2):131-139.
［14］顾孟迪,张婧屹,张延锋.风险态度对医疗保险决策的影响［J］.系统管理学报,2010,19(2):136-139.
GU Mengdi，ZHANG Jingyi，ZHANG Yanfeng.Effects of risk attitudes in medical insurance decision［J］.Journal of Systems & Management,2010,19(2):136-139.
［15］张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学［M］.上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
［16］尤天慧,樊治平.一种基于决策者风险态度的区间数多指标决策方法［J］.运筹与管理,2002,11(5):1-4.
YOU Tianhui, FAN Zhiping.A method for multiple attribute decision making with intervals based on risk attitudes of decision makers［J］.Operations Research and Management Science,2002,11(5):1-4.
［17］肖枝洪.一种基于决策者风险态度的区间数多指标方法的注记［J］.运筹与管理,2004,13(3):52-55.
XIAO Zhihong.The Note on a method for multiple attribute decision making with intervals based on risk attitudes of decision makers［J］.Operations Research and Management Science,2004,13(3):52-55. 
［18］WILLIAMSON O E.Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications［M］.New York:Free Press,1975. 
［19］WILLIAMSON O E.The economic institutions of capitalism［M］.New York:Free Press,1985.

[1]	田永杰. 经销商公平偏好的供应链合作广告策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 67-75.
[2]	宋英华, 曹雪竹, 刘丹. 考虑风险规避与零售商谎报行为的绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 19-26,34.
[3]	蔡东, 胡七丹, 郭春香. 碳交易下供应链中的技术创新激励合约设计[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(5): 133-140.
[4]	申笑宇, 宋炆倩. 不对称信息下考虑供应中断和延期交货的采购合同设计[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(2): 1-6.
[5]	张月义，陈太义，宋明顺. 一种基于动态博弈的提高过程质量成效的新视角[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 7-13.
[6]	王勇，朱龙涛. 信息不对称下具有损失规避者参与的供应链决策与协调[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(6): 50-56.
[7]	朱琳琳，肖人彬. 信息不对称下多供应商与单零售商的退货策略[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(5): 92-98.
[8]	童乾1,2, 沈乐平2. 基于生产管理系统可靠性因素的激励模型[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(6): 22-26.
[9]	倪渊1，林健2. 知识型团队内部知识转移与团队绩效的关系[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(3): 74-79.