基于DEA的玩性人格与团队创新行为效率研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2018.05.003

工业工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 18-23.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2018.05.003

基于DEA的玩性人格与团队创新行为效率研究

苏海涛¹, 翟江辉¹, 邱彦深²

1. 南昌大学经济与管理学院江西南昌 330031;
2. 三鑫医疗科技有限公司江西南昌 330200

收稿日期:2017-12-06 出版日期:2018-10-30 发布日期:2018-11-05
作者简介:苏海涛(1963-),男,河南省人,教授,博士,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为质量管理与控制、人工智能研究
基金资助:
江西省研究生创新专项项目（YC2017-S028）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（51765043）

Research on the Efficiency of Playing Personality and Team Innovation Based on DEA

Su Haitao¹, Zhai Jianghui¹, Qiu Yanshen²

1. College of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
2. Sanxin Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330200, China

Received:2017-12-06 Online:2018-10-30 Published:2018-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 评价不同企业员工玩性人格对团队创新行为效率的影响程度。针对创新行为多方面输出、玩性人格多种类输入的特点，使用层次分析法（AHP）转化多种因素成相应的综合指标；利用数据包络分析（DEAP、编程排序）评价各个企业的综合创新行为效率。结果表明：长安、格力、海能达、华宇四个企业玩性人格控制较好，其他企业都处于规模报酬递增状态。在此基础上，以长安汽车作为标杆企业，对其他企业玩性人格的影响行为提出合理的对策，提高企业的创新行为

关键词: 创新行为, 玩性人格, 规模报酬, 数据包络分析, 标杆

Abstract: A research is conducted into evaluating the degree of influence of employee personality of different companies on the efficiency of team innovation. Aiming at the characteristics of multi-facet output of innovation behavior and multi-type input of playful personality, AHP is used to transform various factors into corresponding comprehensive indicators, and data envelopment analysis (DEAP, programming sequencing) is used to evaluate the comprehensive innovation of each enterprise behavioral efficiency. The results show that:the four companies under research, i. e. Changan, Gree, Hainengda, and Huayu, have good control of playful personality, and other companies are in a state of increasing returns to scale. On this basis, taking Changan Automobile as a benchmarking company, reasonable countermeasures for the influence behaviors of other enterprises' playful personality and for the improvement of the company's innovative behavior are proposed.

Key words: innovative behavior, playful personality, scale pay, data envelopment analysis(DEA), benchmark

中图分类号:

C913.2

苏海涛, 翟江辉, 邱彦深. 基于DEA的玩性人格与团队创新行为效率研究[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(5): 18-23.

Su Haitao, Zhai Jianghui, Qiu Yanshen. Research on the Efficiency of Playing Personality and Team Innovation Based on DEA[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2018, 21(5): 18-23.

参考文献

[1] 银路. 企业技术创新管理[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2004.
[2] 王忠, 郭欢. 玩趣人格对员工创造力作用机理研究——关于创造力形成的新研究视角[J]. 科技理研究, 2015, 35(2):108-113. WANG Zhong, GUO Huan. Research on the mechanism of playful personality to employee creativity——A new perspective of creativity formation[J]. Science of Science and Technology, 2015, 35(2):108-113.
[3] 杨付, 张丽华. 团队沟通、工作不安全氛围对创新行为的影响:创造力自我效能感的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(10):1383-1401. YANG Fu, ZHANG Lihua. The influence of team communication and work insecurity on innovation behavior:the regulating role of creativity self-efficacy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(10):1383-1401.
[4] 顾远东, 周文莉, 彭纪生. 组织支持感对研发人员创新行为的影响机制研究[J]. 管理科学, 2014, 27(1):109-119. GU Yuandong, ZHOU Wenli, PENG Jisheng. Study on the influencing mechanism of organizational support on R&D staffs' innovative behaviors[J]. Management Science, 2014, 27(1):109-119.
[5] 王国猛, 孙吴信宜, 郑全全, 等. 情绪创造力对员工创新行为的影响:情绪社会建构理论的视角[J]. 心理科学, 2016(1):124-130. WANG Guomeng, SUN Wuxinyi, ZHENG Quanquan, et al. Emotional creativity impact on employees' innovative behavior:A perspective of emotional social construction theory[J]. Psychological Science, 2016(1):124-130.
[6] DRUCKER P F. The discipline of innovation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1985, 76(6):149.
[7] HSU M L A, HOU Sheng-Tsung, FAN Hsueh-Liang. Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting:optimism as a moderator[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2011, 45(4):258-272.
[8] DA SILVA F Q B, MONTEIRO C V F, DOS SANTOS I E, et al. How software development group leaders influence team members' innovative behavior[J]. IEEE Software, 2016, 33(5):106-109.
[9] LAI P, POTTER A, BEYNON M, et al. Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique[J]. Transport Policy, 2015, 42:75-85.
[10] LEE S K, MOGI G, LI Z, et al. Measuring the relative efficiency of hydrogen energy technologies for implementing the hydrogen economy:An integrated fuzzy AHP/DEA approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(20):12655-12663.
[11] Azadeh A, Ghaderi S F, Izadbakhsh H. Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization[J]. Applied Mathematics & Computation, 2008, 195(2):775-785.
[12] 苏海涛, 马晓伟, 沈毛虎. 基于DEA方法的质量控制效率研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2008, 27(10):86-88. Su Haitao, Ma Xiaowei, Shen Maohu. Research on quality control efficiency based on DEA method[J]. Industrial Technology & Economy, 2008, 27(10):86-88.
[13] 唐勇, 张骁, 周霞, 等. 基于DEA-Tobit的创新型医药生物企业创新效率[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5):115-121. TANG Yong, ZHANG Xiao, ZHOU Xia, et al. Innovative efficiency of innovative pharmaceutical bio-enterprises based on DEA-Tobit[J]. Industrial Engineering, 2015, 18(5):115-121.
[14] 王爱虎, 吴文玲. 基于三阶段DEA模型的珠三角港口效率研究[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(3):82-88. WANG Aihu, WU Wenling. Research on the port efficiency of the pearl river delta based on the three-phase DEA model[J]. Industrial Engineering, 2017, 20(3):82-88.
[15] 张巧莉, 范元伟. 基于DEA视窗分析的渤海湾地区港口内部运营效率[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5):100-106. ZHANG Qiaoli, FAN Yuanwei. DEA-based window analysis of the internal operational efficiency of the Bohai Bay area[J]. Industrial Engineering, 2015, 18(5):100-106.
[16] 阎亮, 张治河. 组织创新氛围对员工创新行为的混合影响机制[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(9):97-105. YAN Liang, ZHANG Zhihe. A mixed mechanism model of organizational innovation climate influencing the employee innovation behavior[J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(9):97-105.
[17] JANG Ha-SooA. Study on the influence of internal motivation and external motivation on creative behavior:the mediating role of job satisfaction[J]. The Journal of Convergence on Culture Technology, 2018, 4(1):175-182.

基于DEA的玩性人格与团队创新行为效率研究

Research on the Efficiency of Playing Personality and Team Innovation Based on DEA

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王秋莲, 黄愿. 基于DEA的制造系统全要素能源效率评价与优化[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(5): 19-24.
[2]	张巧莉，范元伟. 基于技术差距的长江水系主要内河港口效率[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(1): 156-162.
[3]	汤良1,2，赵希男2. 基于理想点的DEA交叉效率评价研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(6): 93-96.
[4]	甘卫华1，许颖1，黄雯2，丁茹1，何德顺3. 基于DEA-Malmquist的江西省物流业全要素生产率研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(2): 108-114.
[5]	范璐1，贾振虎2，涂传清3，王爱虎2. 通信运营商定制移动终端物流服务商选择研究[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(6): 42-47.
[6]	曾鸣，丁士，王致杰，刘珊珊，薛松. 基于DEA的供电企业安全投入产出分析[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(4): 91-95.
[7]	廖志高1，许明辉1，徐玖平2. 基于DEA和SD的区域物流有效性评价及优化研究[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(4): 96-102.
[8]	周国强1,2，王雪青1，郭清娥3. 基于改进DEA-FCA的信用评价方法[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(6): 67-71.
[9]	李宁1, 杨印生2. 基于SVM分类器的平行链式DEA企业绩效评价模型与应用研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(4): 56-61.
[10]	李集城. 广东专业镇科技创新服务平台运行能力评价实证研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(4): 73-79.
[11]	吴文清，赵黎明. 中国国家软件产业基地动态效率评价[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(6): 37-43.
[12]	周霞，景保峰. 基于DEA模型的广东省级工程中心技术效率研究[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(6): 49-54.
[13]	鲍新中，刘小军，王宁. 基于合作博弈和数据包络分析的联合库存成本分摊[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(4): 23-27.
[14]	李荔1, 孙建强2. 广东高校科技资源投入产出效率研究[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(4): 114-118.