检验THERP合理性及不足的实验研究——以汽车冷媒加注工序为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2019.01.011

工业工程 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 85-89.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2019.01.011

检验THERP合理性及不足的实验研究——以汽车冷媒加注工序为例

邓明明^1,2, 朱郭奇²

1. 陕西科技大学机电工程学院, 陕西西安 710021;
2. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2018-05-24 出版日期:2019-02-28 发布日期:2019-02-26
作者简介:邓明明(1977-),男,陕西省人,副教授,博士,博士后,主要研究方向为工业工程、人因工程
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71471144）；陕西省教育厅专项科研计划资助项目（18JK0088）；工效学会-津发优秀青年学者联合研究基金资助项目

An Experimental Study of the Rationality and Weakness of THERP-with an Example of the Truck Refrigerant Filling Process

DENG Mingming^1,2, ZHU Guoqi²

1. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710021, China;
2. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2018-05-24 Online:2019-02-28 Published:2019-02-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了检验人的失误概率预测技术（technique of human error rate prediction，THERP）的合理性及不足，以汽车内饰冷媒加注工序为例，采用E-prime实验的方法分析了冷媒加注工序的人因失误概率。通过比较发现，汽车冷媒加注工序的4个任务的人因失误概率的实验结果与THERP的理论计算结果基本一致，说明了THERP方法的合理性。并说明了THERP的不足在于计算人因失误时忽略了操作行为中的认知过程。

关键词: 人因失误, 失误概率预测技术(THERP), 认知, 冷媒加注工序

Abstract: To explore the rationality and weakness of technique of human error rate prediction (THERP), an E-prime experimental method was applied to analyze human error probability in the refrigerant filling process, by THERP with an example of the truck refrigerant filling process. It was found that the experiment results were basically in coincidence with the result of THERP, which illustrated the rationality of THERP. The weakness of THERP was that it neglected the cognitive process of the operation behavior while calculating human errors.

Key words: human error, technique of human error rate prediction (THERP), cognition, refrigerant filling process

中图分类号:

F406

邓明明, 朱郭奇. 检验THERP合理性及不足的实验研究——以汽车冷媒加注工序为例[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(1): 85-89.

DENG Mingming, ZHU Guoqi. An Experimental Study of the Rationality and Weakness of THERP-with an Example of the Truck Refrigerant Filling Process[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2019, 22(1): 85-89.

参考文献

[1] SWAIN A D, GUTTMANN H E. Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applica-tions[R]. United States:Sandia National Labs, 1983.
[2] REASON J. Human Error[M]. UK:Cambridge university Press, 1990.
[3] ALVARENGA M, FRUTUOSO E MELO P F, FONSECA R A. A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in human reliability analysis[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2014, 75:25-41
[4] ABBASSI R, KHAN F, GARANIYA V, et al. An integrated method for human error probability assessment during the maintenance of offshore facilities[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 94(3):172-179
[5] SHIRLEY R, SMIDTS C, LI M, et al. Validating THERP:assessing the scope of a full-scale validation of the technique for human error rate prediction[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 77(3):194-211
[6] KIRWAN B. The validation of three human reliablity quantification techniques-THREP, HEART and JHEDI:part 1-technique descriptions and validation issues[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1996, 27(6):359-373
[7] KIRWAN B, RICHARD C. The validation of three human reliablity quantificatio techniques-THREP, HEART and JHEDI:Part 2-results of validation exercise[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1997, 28(1):17-25
[8] KIRWAN B. The validation of three human reliablity quantification techniques-THREP, HEART and JHEDI:Part 3-practical aspects of the usage of the techniques[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1997, 28(1):27-39
[9] 黄曙东, 戴立操, 张力. 核电厂人因可靠性量化分析与应用[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2006, 11(2):48-51 HUANG Shudong, DAI Licao, ZHANG Li. Quantitative analysis and application of human reliability in nuclear power plant[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2006, 11(2):48-51
[10] 童节娟, 余少杰, 赵军. 核电站人员可靠性分析方法THERP中的班组因素[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 50(9):1425-1428 TONG Jiejuan, YU Shaojie, ZHAO Jun. Team factors in the reliability analysis method THERP of nuclear power plant personnel[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 50(9):1425-1428
[11] 孙瑞山, 张思远. 人的可靠性综合分析模式及应用[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(2):49-54 SUN Ruishan, ZHANG Siyuan. Research and application of integrated human reliability analysis mode[J]. Industrial Engineering, 2014, 17(2):49-54
[12] 蒋英杰, 孙志强. 典型认知模型及其在人因可靠性分析中的应用评述[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2011, 11(1):197-201 JIANG Yinjie, SUN Zhiqiang. A review of typical cognitive model and its application in the analysis of human reliability[J]. Journal of safety and environment, 2011, 11(1):197-201

检验THERP合理性及不足的实验研究——以汽车冷媒加注工序为例

An Experimental Study of the Rationality and Weakness of THERP-with an Example of the Truck Refrigerant Filling Process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩文民, 黄劲松, 吴俊, 夏华杰, 章露露. 基于近红外光学脑成像实验的轻型装配作业的中断效应研究[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(3): 57-64.
[2]	陈晔, 陈萌, 徐海燕, 谢华. 基于FCM-DEMATEL航班风险评估与改进[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(3): 1-8,27.
[3]	邓明明1, 2, 3，朱郭奇2, 3. 基于ACT-R模型的汽车冷媒加注工序人因防错研究[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(6): 77-82.
[4]	戚星，陆刚，靳波，史德强，郭其科，陈振伟. 综掘工作面人因失误模型[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(3): 109-114.
[5]	史德强，陆刚，王磊. 煤矿井下作业人因可靠性[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 155-159.
[6]	孙瑞山，张思远. 人的可靠性综合分析模式及应用[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(2): 49-54.
[7]	陈为1，李世其1, 付艳1 , 王春慧2. 精细追踪类监控作业行为认知建模研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(6): 1-7.
[8]	陈伟杰，肖智. 基于FCM与Max-min扩展模型的制造业供应商风险评估方法研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(6): 89-94.
[9]	李海燕1，冯春1，张怡2. 基于FCM的灾难救援团队中快速信任的推理分析[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(6): 132-138.