多维异质信息混合的河南自贸试验区工程项目群优选决策方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.04.015

工业工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 125-133.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.04.015

多维异质信息混合的河南自贸试验区工程项目群优选决策方法

韩二东

洛阳师范学院商学院，河南洛阳 471934

收稿日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2022-08-30
作者简介:韩二东(1987—)，男，河南省人，讲师，博士，主要研究方向为区域经济、决策理论与方法
基金资助:
河南省软科学研究计划资助项目(192400410042)

An Optimization Selection Decision Making Method of Engineering Project Group in Henan Pilot Free Trade Zone Based on Mixed Multi-dimensional Heterogeneity Information

HAN Erdong

School of Business, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China

Received:2020-11-11 Published:2022-08-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为对子项目间存在交互耦合关联的工程项目群进行优选决策，基于前景理论以规范化处理后的决策矩阵确定正、负理想参照点；基于垂面距离计算各备选工程项目群在单个准则下的前景价值，以所有备选工程项目群的综合前景值总和最大化构建非线性规划模型确定各准则权重；基于改进TODIM方法通过总优势度对备选工程项目群排序择优，经灵敏度分析、对比分析探讨各类型参数变化对排序结果的影响，验证该决策方法的有效性与可行性。

关键词: 工程项目群, 混合型多准则决策, 前景理论, 垂面距离, 交互多属性决策 (TODIM) 方法

Abstract: In order to deal with optimal decision problem of engineering project group with interactive coupling correlation among sub-projects, the positive and negative ideal reference points are determined by the normalized decision matrix based on prospect theory. Based on the vertical distance, the prospect value of each alternative engineering project group under a single criterion is calculated, a nonlinear programming model is built to maximize the sum of the comprehensive prospect value of all the alternative engineering project groups to determine the weight of each criterion. The ranking of alternative engineering projects is selected based on improved TODIM method and according to the total superiority degree. Through sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis, the influence of different parameters on the ranking results is discussed, to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the decision making method.

Key words: engineering project group, hybrid multi-criteria decision making, prospect theory, vertical projection distance, TODIM (tomada de decisao interativa multicriterio) method

中图分类号:

C934

韩二东. 多维异质信息混合的河南自贸试验区工程项目群优选决策方法[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(4): 125-133.

HAN Erdong. An Optimization Selection Decision Making Method of Engineering Project Group in Henan Pilot Free Trade Zone Based on Mixed Multi-dimensional Heterogeneity Information[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(4): 125-133.

参考文献

[1] GUO F, HUANG T. Study on system coupling interaction of large-scale construction companies programme contracting and firm growth[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2015, 2(2): 137-140
[2] 廖佳, 周强. 基于演化博弈的工程项目施工安全管理分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 71-76
LIAO Jia, ZHOU Qiang. Research on project safety management based on evolutionary game theory[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5): 71-76
[3] 何寿奎, 梁功雯, 蒙建波. 基于前景理论的重大工程多主体利益博弈与行为演化机理[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(5): 207-214
HE Shoukui, LIANG Gongwen, MENG Jianbo. Multi-subjects benefit game and behavior evolution mechanism of major engineering based on prospect theory[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(5): 207-214
[4] LIAMAZARES B. An analysis of the generalized TODIM method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 269(3): 1041-1049
[5] 刘熠, 秦亚, 刘好斌, 等. 广义q-ROF TODIM方法及应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(8): 2021-2028
LIU Yi, QIN Ya, LIU Haobin, et al. Generalized q-ROF TODIM method and its application[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(8): 2021-2028
[6] 王霞, 党耀国. 基于改进的TODIM方法的区间灰数多属性决策模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(2): 261-266
WANG Xia, DANG Yaoguo. Multiple attribute decision-making model with interval grey number based on improved TODIM method[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(2): 261-266
[7] 滕剑仑, 吴坚, 余高锋, 等. 考虑决策者行为的水环境审计绩效异质信息多指标综合评价[J]. 控制与决策, 2018, 33(10): 1879-1885
TENG Jianlun, WU Jian, YU Gaofeng, et al. Heterogeneous information and multitude index synthesis evaluation method of water environment audit performance under consideration of DM behaviors[J]. Control and Decision, 2018, 33(10): 1879-1885
[8] 余高锋, 费巍, 叶银芳. 基于前景理论的农村电子商务发展水平多维偏好决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(9): 2182-2188
YU Gaofeng, FEI Wei, YE Yinfang. The developing level of rural E-commerce multidimensional preference decision making method based on prospect theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(9): 2182-2188
[9] 陈伟, 李金秋, 杨早立. 一种基于“垂面”距离和IFE的直觉模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(9): 7-12,20
CHEN Wei, LI Jinqiu, YANG Zaoli. A multi-attribute decision-making method in intuitionistic fuzzy set based on vertical projection distance and IFE[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(9): 7-12,20
[10] 马健, 孙秀霞. 基于效用曲线改进的前景理论价值函数[J]. 信息与控制, 2011, 40(4): 501-506
MA Jian, SUN Xiuxia. Modified value function in prospect theory based on utility curve[J]. Information and Control, 2011, 40(4): 501-506
[11] KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Economica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291

多维异质信息混合的河南自贸试验区工程项目群优选决策方法

An Optimization Selection Decision Making Method of Engineering Project Group in Henan Pilot Free Trade Zone Based on Mixed Multi-dimensional Heterogeneity Information

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	庄丽, 马婷婷, 刘硕, 刘兰梅. 基于PT-MA理论的装配式建筑施工安全管理行为演化博弈分析[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(2): 68-76,118.
[2]	马跃如, 文铮, 易丹. 考虑老年人满意度的多目标居家养老护理员路径优化[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 74-81,103.
[3]	毛亚兰, 张锦. 考虑乘客不完全理性行为的轨道交通车站应急疏散方法研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(3): 138-144,153.
[4]	曹帅, 朱建军, 林松, 于亮. 考虑市场前景的运载火箭研制GERT网络TCQ优化方法[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(6): 65-76.
[5]	刘素霞, 徐建飞. 基于前景理论的企业安全投入决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(5): 45-50.
[6]	黄益平, 杨琴, 李青, 张伟. 考虑客户等待时间感知的快递车辆优化调度[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(4): 31-36,48.
[7]	罗建强，汤娜，赵艳萍. 基于累积前景理论的服务衍生方案决策[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(2): 80-87.