基于区间二型模糊EDAS的多属性决策方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2023.01.010

工业工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 91-97.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2023.01.010

基于区间二型模糊EDAS的多属性决策方法

金腾宇, 耿秀丽

上海理工大学管理学院，上海 200093

收稿日期:2021-09-06 发布日期:2023-03-09
作者简介:金腾宇 (1996—) ，男，江苏省人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为决策理论与方法
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目 (72271164) ；教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目 (19YJA630021) ；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目 (20133120120002)

Multi-attribute Decision Making Method Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy EDAS

JIN Tengyu, GENG Xiuli

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

Received:2021-09-06 Published:2023-03-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对多属性决策存在的复杂性和不确定性问题，提出基于区间二型模糊平均解距离法 (evaluation based on distance from average solution，EDAS) 的多属性决策方法。采用区间二型模糊集合 (interval type-2 fuzzy sets，IT2FS) 表达评价信息解决专家的偏好信息存在个体化差异问题，并纳入EDAS对备选方案进行排序。以区间二型模糊数表达评价信息构建决策矩阵，以计算得到的综合评价值的去模糊化结果作为最终的方案排序依据。针对EDAS中属性权重需要从外部获取的问题，采用区间二型模糊集合改进的最优最劣法 (best-worst method，BWM) 确定属性权重。最后，以某汽车制造企业选购新能源汽车云服务方案为例，验证所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 多属性决策, 区间二型模糊集合, EDAS, BWM

Abstract: Aiming at the complexity and uncertainty of multi-attribute decision-making, a multi-attribute decision-making method based on interval type-2 fuzzy EDAS is proposed. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS) is used to express the evaluation information to solve the problem of individual differences in experts' preference information. The evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) is used to rank the alternatives, and the interval type-2 fuzzy number is used to express the evaluation information to construct the decision matrix. The final ranking of the schemes is based on the defuzzification result of the calculated comprehensive evaluation value. To solve the problem that attribute weights need to be obtained from outside in EDAS, the best worst method (BWM) improved by interval type-2 fuzzy sets is used to determine the attribute weights. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by taking the cloud service scheme of new energy vehicles purchased by an automobile manufacturing enterprise as an example.

Key words: multi-criteria decision, interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS), evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), best-worst method (BWM)

中图分类号:

C934

金腾宇, 耿秀丽. 基于区间二型模糊EDAS的多属性决策方法[J]. 工业工程, 2023, 26(1): 91-97.

JIN Tengyu, GENG Xiuli. Multi-attribute Decision Making Method Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy EDAS[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2023, 26(1): 91-97.

参考文献

[1] GHORABAEE M K, ZAVADSKAS E K, OLFAT L, et al. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) [J]. Informatica, 2015, 26(3): 435-451
[2] 彭定洪, 张文华. 智慧无废城市评选的序贯式群决策EDAS法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(3): 688-704
PENG Dinghong, ZHANG Wenhua. Sequential group EDAS decision making method for smart zero waste city selection[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematics, 2021, 41(3): 688-704
[3] YAZDANI M, TORKAYESH A E, SANTIBANEZ-GONZALEZ E D, et al. Evaluation of renewable energy resources using integrated Shannon entropy – EDAS model[J]. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2020, 1: 35-42
[4] MISHRA A R, MARDANI A, RANI P, et al. A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 272(1): 122807
[5] 童玉珍, 王应明. 基于后悔理论及EDAS法的概率语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(11): 3152-3158
TONG Yuzhen, WANG Yingming. Multi-attribute group decision making method for probabilistic linguistic term set based on regret theory and distance from average solution method[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(11): 3152-3158
[6] SRIVASTAVA P, MUSTAFA A, KHANDUJA D, et al. Prioritizing autonomous maintenance system attributes using fuzzy EDAS approach[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2020, 167: 1941-1949
[7] 耿秀丽, 马阳. 基于犹豫模糊语言的多阶段多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2021, 38(2): 484-488
GENG Xiuli, MANG Yang. Multi-stage multi-attribute decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2021, 38(2): 484-488
[8] ZADEH L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 9(1): 43-80
[9] MENDEL J M, JOHN R I, LIU F L. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2006, 14(6): 808-821
[10] 刘超, 汤国林, 刘培德. 基于模糊测度与累积前景理论的区间二型模糊多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 70-81
LIU Chao, TANG Guolin, LIU Peide. Interval type-2 fuzzy muti-criteria decision making method based on fuzzy measures and cumulative prospect theory[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(9): 70-81
[11] TURSKIS Z, JUODAGALVIEN? B. A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to assess a stairs shape for dwelling houses[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2016, 22(8): 1078-1087
[12] TURSKIS Z, MORKUNAITE Z, KUTUT V. A hybrid multiple criteria evaluation method of ranking of cultural heritage structures for renovation projects[J]. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2017, 21(3): 318-329
[13] REZAEI J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method[J]. Omega, 2015, 53: 49-57
[14] MENDEL J M. Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: an overview[J]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2007, 2(2): 20-29
[15] KAHRAMAN C, ÖZTAYŞI B, SARİ İ U, et al. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 59: 48-57
[16] CHEN S M, YANG M W, LEE L W, et al. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(5): 5295-5308
[17] GONG X M, YANG M, DU P L. Renewable energy accommodation potential evaluation of distribution network: a hybrid decision-making framework under interval type-2 fuzzy environment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 286: 124918.
[18] 陶秋香, 涂继亮, 程若发, 等. 基于未确知集和模糊TOPSIS决策的故障模式风险评估[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2018, 35(9): 2676-2679
TAO Qiuxiang, XU Jiliang, CHENG Ruofa, et al. Risk assessment of failure mode based on unascertained set and fuzzy TOPSIS decision[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2018, 35(9): 2676-2679

基于区间二型模糊EDAS的多属性决策方法

Multi-attribute Decision Making Method Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy EDAS

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩二东. 多维异质信息混合的河南自贸试验区工程项目群优选决策方法[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(4): 125-133.
[2]	陈晔，曹帅，徐海燕，卢波. 以顾客需求导向的产品评价体系构建研究[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 30-35.
[3]	钱小虎，黄敏，高太光，徒君. 基于BOCR与Choquet积分的多属性逆向拍卖决策[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(6): 54-59.
[4]	许学娜，刘金兰. 基于风险承受力的石油企业最优投资决策[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(6): 60-64.