塔式起重机驾驶员的操控培训方法与任务复杂度的关系

工业工程 ›› 2014, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 17-22.

塔式起重机驾驶员的操控培训方法与任务复杂度的关系

北京建筑大学机电与汽车工程学院工业工程系，北京 100044

出版日期:2014-02-28 发布日期:2014-03-14
作者简介:秦华（1971-），女，安徽省人，副教授，博士，主要研究方向为人因工程、人机交互、建筑人因等.

A Study of the Relationship between Training Methods of Tower Crane Drivers and Task Complexity

Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanicalelectronic and Automobile Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China

Online:2014-02-28 Published:2014-03-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究塔式起重机驾驶员不同的培训方法对操作绩效的影响，以及不同的培训方法和操控任务复杂度之间的关系,利用塔式起重机虚拟仿真实验平台，设计了训练方法和任务复杂度等两因素三水平的实验，通过实验验证了：1）采用不同的培训方法对操作绩效产生显著性的影响；2）不同复杂度操控任务应该采用不同的培训方法。

关键词: 培训方法, 任务复杂度, 塔式起重机

Abstract: To explore the influence from different methods of training tower crane drivers in operation performance, and the relationship between the task complexity and different training methods, an experiment with twofactor and threelevel performance on platform of tower crane virtual simulation is designed, in which the two factors are training methods and task complexity. The results indicate that 1) different training methods will result in significantly different performances; and 2) different training methods should be adopted for different task complexities.

Key words: training methods, task complexity, tower cranes

秦华, 冯欣欣，孟宪颐. 塔式起重机驾驶员的操控培训方法与任务复杂度的关系[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(1): 17-22.

Qin Hua, Feng Xin xin, Meng Xian yi. A Study of the Relationship between Training Methods of Tower Crane Drivers and Task Complexity[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2014, 17(1): 17-22.

参考文献

［1］Crane Safety Analysis and Recommendation Report 2009. Workplace safety and health council in collaboration with the ministry of manpower and the national crane safety taskforce［R/OL］.［2013-06-20］.https:∥www.wshc.sg/wps/PA_InfoStop/download/Crane_Safety_Analysis_Report.pdf?folder=IS2010040500156&file=Crane_Safety_Analysis_Report.pdf. ［2］Laemlaksakul V. Kaewkuekool S. The effect of feed forward training to improve inspector performance［EB/OL］.［2013-06-20］.IEEM2007:423-426. http:∥ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4419224. ［3］Gall M D, Gall J P.The discussion method. ∥ Gage N L. The Psychology of Teaching Method［M］.USA: The University of Chicago Press, 1976: 166-216. ［4］苏维,郭明晶,李志鹏.小组讨论式教学方法与传统教学方法的比较.现代预防医学［J］,2000,27(4): 536-538. Su Wei, Guo Mingjing, Li Zhipeng. Comparison between groupdiscussion teaching method and traditional teaching method［J］. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2000, 27(4): 536538. ［5］雷慧. 表象训练研究状况综述［J］. 甘肃科技,2005, 21(2):187-188. Lei Hui. Review of research status of imagery training［J］. Gansu Science and Technology, 2005, 21(2):187-188. ［6］张文华, 刘杰. 运动表象训练在排球教学中的实验研究［J］. 辽宁体育科技, 2004, 26（2）：72-74. Zhang Wenhua, Liu Jie. Experimental study of imagery training in volleyball teaching［J］. Liaoning Sport Science and Technology, 2004, 26（2）：72-74. ［7］廖建路. 运用表象训练法提高飞行学员空间定向能力研究［J］. 军事体育进修学院学报, 2008,27（3）：92-94. Liao Jianlu. On the imagery training for developing the ability of space orientation for the flight student［J］. Journal of PLA Institute of Physical Education, 2008.27（3）：92-94. ［8］Xing J, Manning C. Complexity and automation displays of air traffic control: literature review and analysis. Washington DC: federal aviation administration［R/OL］.［20130620］.http:∥oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadata Prefix=html&identifier=ADA460107.〖JP〗 ［9］Xing J. Information complexity in air traffic control displays. Humancomputer interaction［EB/OL］.［2013-06-20］.http:∥wenku.baidu.com/view/6417bc20aaea998fcc220ec8.html. ［10］Liu P, Li Z Z, Wang Z. Task complexity measure for emergency operating procedures based on resource requirements in human information processing［CD］. 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference & The Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference （PSAM 11 &ESREL 2012）, June, 25-29, 2012, Helsinki, Finland.［11］Halstead M H. Elements of software science (Operating and programming systems series)［M］. New York, NY, USA:Elsevier Science Inc. 1977. ［12］McCabe T J. A complexity measures［J］. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1976, SE-2(49): 308-320. ［13］Davis J S, Leblanc R J. A study of applicability of complexity measures［J］. IEEE Trans Software Engineering, 1988, 14(9): 1366-1372. ［14］Liu P, Li Z Z. Toward understanding the relationship between task complexity and task performance, internationalization, design and global development lecture notes in computer science volume 6775［EB/OL］.［2013-06-22］. http:∥link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F9783-642-21660-2_22JHJ.  ［15］王庄. 任务复杂度和时间压力对计算机化规程操作绩效的影响［D］. 北京：清华大学，2012. Wang Zhuang. Effects of task complexity and time pressure on operation performance of computerized procedures［D］. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012. ［16］Zhang Y，Zhang X，Liu M，et al． Research on astronaut training methods for complicated operation. AHFE Organization Issues in Safety and Performance［EB/OL］.［2013-06-25］.http:∥www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/EBK1439834992-119.