人的可靠性综合分析模式及应用

工业工程 ›› 2014, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 49-54.

人的可靠性综合分析模式及应用

中国民航大学民航安全科学研究所，天津 300300

出版日期:2014-04-30 发布日期:2014-06-05
作者简介:孙瑞山（1958-），男，天津市人，教授，主要研究方向为航空中的人为因素.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（61304207，U1333112）；国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）资助项目（2010CB734105）

Research and Application of Integrated Human Reliability Analysis Mode

Research Institute of Civil Aviation Safety, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Online:2014-04-30 Published:2014-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提高系统可靠性的关键步骤是提高系统中人的可靠性，这需要对人的可靠性进行分析。当前分析人的可靠性主要依靠运用各类HRA模型，这些模型各有优缺点。为了研究航空人为差错，选取了具有代表性的3个HRA模型，对人的可靠性分析模型THERP（technique for human error rate prediction)、CREAM（cognitive reliability and error analysis method)、IDAC(information decision and action)进行了分析。将3种模型进行比较，找出它们的优劣之处，结合3种模型的优点，建立了以THERP模型、CREAM模型以及IDAC模型为主体的人的可靠性综合分析模式，并将该分析模式在航空人为差错分析上进行了应用，并给出实例说明该分析模式的应用。

关键词: 综合分析模式, 人失误率预测, 认知可靠性, 航空安全

Abstract: Enhancing human reliability is the key process for enhancing system reliability. Hence, it is necessary to analyze human reliability. Currently, various human reliability analysis (HRA) models are used to accomplish this goal. However, these models have their own limits. In order to analyze human errors in aviation, three HRA models are applied, including technique for human error rate prediction (THERP), cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM), and information decision action in a crew (IDAC), compared and eventually combined. By establishing an integrated model which makes use of three models advantages, the human errors in aviation can be effectively analyzed. An example is given to illustrate the application of the proposed model.

Key words: integrated analysis, human error rate prediction, cognitive reliability, aviation safety

孙瑞山，张思远. 人的可靠性综合分析模式及应用[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(2): 49-54.

Sun Rui-shan，Zhang Si-yuan. Research and Application of Integrated Human Reliability Analysis Mode[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2014, 17(2): 49-54.

参考文献

［1］中国民航安全年报2011.2001-2010年中国民航飞行事故按原因统计［R］.北京:中国民航出版社,2011:11-20. Chinas civil aviation safety report 2011.2001-2010 China's civil aviation flight accidents according to the statistical reasons［R］.Beijing:China Civil Aviation Press,2011:11-20. ［2］黄祥瑞.可靠性工程［M］.北京:清华大学出版社,1990:160-170. ［3］张晶晶,张礼敬,陶刚.人的可靠性分析研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(1):76-81. Zhang Jing-jing,Zhang Li-jing,Tao Gang.Analysis and study on human reliability［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(1):76-81. ［4］Chang Y H J, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 1: Overview of the IDAC model［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(8):997-1013. ［5］孙瑞山,赵青.航空人为差错事故/事件分析(ECAR)模型研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2012,22(2):17-22. Sun Rui-shan, Zhao Qing. Study on ECAR model for human error analysis of aviation accident/Incident［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(2):17-22. ［6］张力,黄曙东.人因可靠性分析方法［J］.中国安全科学学报,2001,11(3):6-16. Zhang Li, Huang Shudong. Human factors reliability analysis method［J］.China Safety Science Journal, 2001, 11(3):6-16. ［7］王遥,沈祖培,高佳.CREAM追溯法及其在根原因分析中的应用［J］.核科学与工程,2005,25(1):30-34. Wang Yao, Shen Zu-pei, Gao Jia. CREAM Retrospective approach and application in root cause analysis［J］.Nuclear Science and Engineering,2005,25(1):30-34. ［8］孙瑞山,王鑫.CREAM失误概率预测法在驾驶舱机组判断与决策过程中的应用［J］.中国安全生产技术,2010,6(6):40-45. Sun Rui-shan, Wang Xin. CREAM Error probability prediction method and application in the cockpit crew judgment and decisionmaking process［J］. Safety in Production and Technology of China,2010，6(6):40-45. ［9］Chang Y H J, Mosleh A.Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents:Part 2:IDAC performance influencing factors model［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(8):10141040.〖ZK)〗 ［10］Chang Y H J, Mosleh A.Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 3:IDAC operator response model［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(8):1041-1060. ［11］Chang Y H J, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operatingcrew response to complex system accidents: Part 4:IDAC causal model of operator problemsolving response［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(8):1061-1075. ［12］廖丽平,张光宇,刘绘珍.影响系统安全的组织因素实证分析［J］.工业工程,2011,14(6):44-54. Liao Liping, Zhang Guangyu, Liu Huizhen. Empirical analysis of safetysensitive organizational factors［J］.Industrial Engineering Journal,2011,14(6):44-54. ［13］王世锦,隋东.空中交通管制员人因可靠性定量分析研究［J］.人类工效学,2009,15(4):46-50. Wang Shi-jin, Sui Dong. Air traffic controllers for quantitative analysis of the reliability research［J］.Ergonomics,2009,15(4):46-50. ［14］高文宇,张力.人员可靠性分析系统设计［J］.工业工程,2003,6(1):74-84. Gao Wen-yu, Zhang Li. The design of human reliability analysis system［J］.Industrial Engineering Journal,2003,6(1):74-84. ［15］张力,黄曙东,黄祥瑞.基于THERP+HCR的人因事件分析模式及应用［J］.核动力工程,2003,24(3):272-276. Zhang Li, Huang Shu-dong, Huang Xiang-rui. THERP+HCRbased model for human factor event analysis and its application［J］.Nuclear Power Engineering, 2003,24(3):272-276. ［16］Chang Y H J, Mosleh A.Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 5:Dynamic probabilistic simulation of the IDAC model［J］.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(8):1076-1101. ［17］ Sun Rui-shan, Chen Yun-fei, Liu Xin-yi, et al. A method of analysis integrating HCR and ETA modeling for determining risks associated with inadequate flight separation events［J］．Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 2011, 1(1):19-27.