相互依赖、沟通与供应链联盟绩效的关系研究

工业工程 ›› 2015, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 56-63.

相互依赖、沟通与供应链联盟绩效的关系研究

（东北大学工商管理学院，辽宁沈阳 110169）

出版日期:2015-10-31 发布日期:2016-03-24
作者简介:卢纪华（1972-），男，山东省人，副教授，博士，主要研究方向为绩效管理．
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71271048）

A Research on Relationships of Interdependencies，Communication and Performance of Supply Chain Alliance

(School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)

Online:2015-10-31 Published:2016-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 结合相关研究，将相互依赖分为任务、目标和报酬3个维度去研究供应链联盟伙伴间的相互依赖与沟通对联盟绩效的影响，提出了沟通作为中介变量的相互依赖对联盟绩效的的概念模型和相关假设,并设计相应问卷，对问卷进行了信效度分析、相关分析、多元回归分析。分析结果表明，供应链伙伴相互依赖对沟通有正向影响，相互依赖对联盟绩效有正向影响，沟通对联盟绩效有正向影响，而且沟通可作为供应链伙伴相互依赖与联盟绩效的中介变量且中介效应比较显著，通过分析和讨论从实证分析出来的结果，以此基础提出供应链联盟企业如何从依赖关系方面、沟通方面着手提高联盟绩效的一些合理化建议。

关键词: 供应链联盟, 相互依赖, 沟通, 联盟绩效

Abstract: Based on related research, the interdependencies are divided into three dimensions, which are tasks, goals and rewards, in order to study the influence of interdependencies and communication on alliance performance. Communication is used as an intervening variable, the concept model of mutual dependency on alliance performance and related assumptions are proposed. The corresponding questionnaires are designed. Based on the reliability analysis, validity analysis, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis, the results indicate that the interdependencies of supply chain partners have a positive influence on communication and alliance performance, that communication has a positive influence on alliance performance, and that as an intermediary variable between the interdependencies of supply chain partners and alliance performance, communication has a significant intermediary effect. Based on the result of the analysis and discussion from the empirical study, some suggestions are proposed to improve the alliance performance from the perspective of interdependent relationship and communication. 

Key words: supply chain alliance, interdependence, communication, alliance performance 

卢纪华，唐志昆，赵希男. 相互依赖、沟通与供应链联盟绩效的关系研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 56-63.

Lu Ji-hua，Tang Zhi-kun，Zhao Xi-nan. A Research on Relationships of Interdependencies，Communication and Performance of Supply Chain Alliance[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2015, 18(5): 56-63.

参考文献

［1］李迁，丁翔. 基于计算实验的供应链联盟形成机制研究［J］．管理学报，2013，10（7）：1060-1064. Li Qian, Ding Xiang. Mechanism of supply chain alliance based on computational experiment［J］. Chinese Journal of Management, 2013, 10(7): 1060-1064. ［2］Zhang Jie, Frazier G V F. Strategic alliance via coopetition: supply chain partnership with a competitor ［J］. Decision Support Systems, 2011,51(4):853-863 ［3］Vanpoucke E, Vereecke A. The predictive value of behavioural characteristics on the success of strategic alliance ［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2010, 48(22): 6715-6738. ［4］Murali S, Loke S P, Zainal A M, et al. Factors influencing strategic alliance outcomes in a manufacturing supply chain: role of alliance motives, interdependence, asset specificity and relational capital ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013,141(1): 323-344. ［5］Yue Dajun, You Fengqi.Fair profit allocation in supply chain optimization with transfer price and revenue sharing: MINLP model and algorithm for cellulosic biofuel supply chains ［J］. AIChE Journal, 2014,60(9): 2206-2227. ［6］Murali S, Loke S P, Zainal A M, et al. Impact of interdependence between supply chain partner on strategic alliance outcomes: role of relational capital as a mediating construct［J］. Management Decision, 2011,49(4): 1-23. ［7］Carr A S, Pearson J N. Strategically managed buyersupplier reIationships and performance outcomes ［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 1999, 17(5): 497-519. ［8］江积海,宁红英. 基于四度模型的供应链企业间知识转移有效性的实证研究［J］．研究与发展管理，2011，23（5）：118-127. Jiang Ji-hai, Ning Hong-ying. Empirical study on knowledge transfer validity in supply chain based on fourdimension model ［J］. R & D Management, 2011, 23(5): 118-127. ［9］Wong C L, Tjosvold D. Goal interdependence and quality in services marketing ［J］. Psychology & Marketing, 1995, 12(3): 189-205. ［10］Kiggundu M N. Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory ［J］. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 31(2), 145-172. ［11］Locke E A, Latham G P. A theory of goalsetting and taskperformance ［J］. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(2): 480-483. ［12］Campion M D, Papper E M, Medsker G J. Relations between work team characteristic and effectiveness: a replication and extension ［J］. Personnel psychology, 2006, 49(2): 429-452. ［13］Vijfeijken H, Kleingeld P, Tuijl H, et al. Task complexity and task, goal and reward interdependence in group performance management: a prescriptive model ［J］. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2002, 11(3): 363-383. ［14］Trent R J, Monczka R M. Purchasing and supply management: trends and changes throughout the 1990s ［J］. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1998, 34(3): 2-11. ［15］李新然，胡鹏旭，牟宗玉. 第三方回收闭环供应链协调应对突发事件研究［J］．科研管理，2013，34（1）：99-107. Li Xin-ran, Hu Peng-xu, Mu Zong-yu. The closed loop supply chain recycling by third party coordinative replying unexpected accident ［J］, Science Research Management, 2013, 34(1): 99-107. ［16］Premus R, Sanders N R. Information sharing in global supply chain alliances［J］. Journal of AsiaPacific Business, 2008, 9(2): 174-192. ［17］Mohr J, Spekman R. Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and confect resolution techniques ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(2):135-152. ［18］Lunnan R, Haugland S A. Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multi dimensional analysis ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29 (5): 545-556. ［19］薛晓燕，赵毅，王月. 建筑业企业组织沟通有效性对联盟绩效的影响研究［J］．工程管理学报，2012，26（5）：114-117. Xue Xiao-yan, Zhao Yi, Wang Yue. Influence of effectiveness of organizational communication on alliance performance in construction enterprises ［J］. Journal of Engineering Management,2012,26(5):114-117. ［20］Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations ［J］. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.