Influence of Presentation Interface of Spatial Information on Path Finding Behavior in Building Fires

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.01.018

Abstract

Abstract: In order to improve the space sharing efficiency between the internal and external groups during the crisis rescue process, two kinds of spatial information interfaces are designed by combining the dynamic building structure change of building fire with the cognitive representation of human spatial information and the interaction of spatial information: static orientation information consistent interface, dynamic orientation information consistent information interface; cognitive style consistent information interface, to explore the impact of orientation information on way-finding performance. The Unity3D software is used to simulate the actual dynamic space environment and to analyze the way-finding behavior of internal personnel in the virtual environment, and the interaction between the inside and outside of the building is recorded through video and interview. The results show that: 1) the way-finding time and travelling distance are shorter with the static information interface, and there are fewer errors in paths in the path-finding process, but the interaction behavior is more frequent; 2) with the dynamic information interface, the path-finding time and path are longer, and the interaction behavior is less in the way-finding process, but the error paths are more.

Key words: building fire, spatial information, path finding behavior, presentation method, cognitive space

CLC Number:

TB18

GAO Xiaotong, QIN Hua, LIU Mengxin, MA Liang. Influence of Presentation Interface of Spatial Information on Path Finding Behavior in Building Fires[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(1): 144-151.

References

[1] 李建华, 张光俊, 黄郑华. 人员密集场所火灾扑救内攻搜救技战术研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2011, 30(4): 326-329
LI Jianhua, ZHANG Guangjun, HUANG Zhenghua. Study on firefighting inner rescue of assembly occupancies[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2011, 30(4): 326-329
[2] 颜学华. 研究新时期下高层办公建筑人员疏散及灭火救援战术[J]. 建设科技, 2017(20): 148
[3] MONTELLO D R. Spatial cognition[J]. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001, 22(22): 14771-14775
[4] SADALLA E K, BURROUGHS W J, STAPLIN L J. Reference points in spatial cognition[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory, 1980, 6(5): 516
[5] BARTIE P, MILLS S, KINGHAM S. An egocentric urban viewshed: a method for landmark visibility mapping for pedestrian location based services[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
[6] 李丹, 杨昭宁. 空间导航: 路标学习和路径整合的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1755-1762
LI Dan, YANG Zhaoning. Spatial navigation: the relationship between landmark learning and path integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1755-1762
[7] SIEGEL J J, NITZ D, BINGMAN V P. Spatial-specificity of single-units in the hippocampal formation of freely moving homing pigeons[J]. Hippocampus, 2005, 15(1): 26
[8] THORNDYKE P W, HAYESROTH B. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14(4): 560-589
[9] FU W T, D’ANDREA L, BERTEL S. Effects of communication methods on communication patterns and performance in a remote spatial orientation task[J]. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 2013, 13(2): 150-180
[10] HINDMARSH J, FRASER M, HEATH C, et al. Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments[C/OL]//Proceeding of the 1998 Acm Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM, 1998(1998-11-01). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/289444.289496.
[11] LOMBARD M , JONES M T . Defining presence[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[12] GAVER W W, SELLEN A, HEATH C, et al. One is not enough: multiple views in a media space[C/OL]// Proceeding of the Interact 93 & Chi 93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1993. (1993-05-01). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/169059.169.268
[13] HINDMARSH J, FRASER M, HEATH C, et al. Object-focused interaction in collaborative virtual environments[J]. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 2000, 7(4): 477-509
[14] CHELLALI A, MILLEVILLE-PENNEL I, CÉDRIC D. Influence of contextual objects on spatial interactions and viewpoints sharing in virtual environments[J]. Virtual Reality, 2013, 17(1): 1-15
[15] 高晓童, 秦华. 建筑火灾中远程交互模式对寻路绩效的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(4): 116-122.
GAO Xiaotong, QIN Hua. Influence of remote interaction mode on pathfinding performance in building fires[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(4): 116-122.
[16] 鲁学军, 秦承志, 张洪岩, 等. 空间认知模式及其应用[J]. 遥感学报, 2005, 9(3): 277-285
LU Xuejun, QIN Chengzhi, ZHANG Hongyan, et al. Spatial cognitive mode and its application[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2005, 9(3): 277-285
[17] CARPMAN J R, GRANT M A, SIMMONS D A. Hospital design and wayfinding: a video simulation study[J]. Environment & Behavior, 1985, 17(17): 296-314
[18] 谌小猛, 刘春玲, 乔福强, 等. 盲人建构陌生环境空间表征的策略及其作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 637-647
CHEN Xiaomeng, LIU Chunling, QIAO Fuqiang, et al. The process of construction of spatial representation in the unfamiliar environment in the blind: The role of strategies and its effect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 637-647
[19] HÖLSCHER C, MEILINGER T, VRACHLIOTIS G, et al. Up the down staircase: wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2006, 26(4): 284-299