S&T Resource Input-Output Effectiveness Analysis of Universities in Guangdong Province

Abstract

Abstract: Based on statistics data from 2000 to 2009, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied to analyze the science and technology (S & T) resource input-output effectiveness of universities in Guangdong Province. Results show that the overall effectiveness during 19992007 is satisfactory, while it is not good enough in the sense of DEA for some years. Also, the effectiveness for different indexes varies greatly with different trends. In general, the pure technology effectiveness is higher than that for the other indexes. Based on the analysis, it is found that inputoutput effectiveness can be improved by increasing research funding.

Key words: research effectiveness of universities in Guangdong, input-output efficiency, data envelopment analysis (DEA)

Li Li1, Sun Jian-qiang2. S&T Resource Input-Output Effectiveness Analysis of Universities in Guangdong Province[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2011, 14(4): 114-118.

References

［1］David C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat. Universities in national innovation systems［R］. U. C. Berkeley：Haas School of Business, 2002. ［2］廖建锋. 高校科技创新基地在国家创新体系中的地位与作用［J］ . 交通高教研究, 2004, 21( 4):8-12. ［3］周静, 王立杰. 主要OECD国家高校科技创新体系的基本要素的比较研究［J］. 高等教育探索, 2005(2): 18-22. ［4］王立杰, 周静, 石晓军. 中国高校科技创新关键投入要素的历史分析与区域比较: 1994~2002［J］. 科学咨询, 2004(12c): 12-16. ［5］钟丽萍,柴明勤,张文峰.省部产学研战略联盟运行机制创新探析［J］. 科技管理研究,2010（4）: 37-39. ［6］Chames A, Cooper W W, Wei Q L A. Semiinfinite multicriteria programming approach to data envelopment analysis with many decisionmaking units［R］. Austin, Taxis: Center for Cybernetic Studies Report, 1986. ［7］Abbott M, Doucouliagos C. The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis［J］. Economics of Education Review, 2003, 22(1)：89-97. ［8］Ahn T, Arnold V, Charnes A, et al. DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas［J］. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 1989（5）：165-185. ［9］Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations［J］. Journal of Urban Economics,1997, 42(3): 422-448. ［10］Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z. Geographical spillovers and university research: a spatial econometric perspective［J］. Growth and Change, 2000, 31(4): 501-515. ［11］Arcelus F J, Coleman D F. An efficiency review of university departments［J］. International Journal of Systems Science, 1997, 28(7): 721-729. ［12］Athanassopoulos A D, Shale E. Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education institutions in the UK by means of data envelopment analysis［J］. Education Economics, 1997, 5(2): 117-134. ［13］Liu Y W.The efficiency analysis of Chinese higher education institutions［J］. Education and Economy, 2001(4): 31-36. ［14］蓝祥龙,谢南斌. 基于AHP／DEA的高校科技创新能力评价指标体系研究［J］. 江西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2010,43(1): 114-120. ［15］周静,王立杰,石晓军.我国不同地区高校科技创新的制度效率与规模效率研究［J］.研究与发展管理,2005(1): 109-117. ［16］樊华. DEA/PCA模型在科技绩效评价中的应用［J］.淮海工学院学报:自然科学版,2005(2):81-84. ［17］杨洪涛.上海市普通高校科技资源配置效率评价［J］.科技管理研究,2008(2):120-122. ［18］赵书新,郑林昌.北京市重点高校科技投入产出效率评价［J］.消费导刊,2009(8):28-29. ［19］陈腾,叶春明,沈杰.基于DEA方法对高校科技成果转化效果评价［J］.情报科学,2006(8):1199-1202. ［20］吴文江.数据包络分析及其应用［M］. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2002,11. ［21］Rune E. How would setting policy priorities according to costbenefit analysis affect the provision of road safety［J］.Accident Analysis&Prevention,2002(868):1-14. ［22］盛昭瀚,朱乔,吴广谋.DEA理论、方法与应用［M］.北京:科学出版社,1996:14-36. ［23］唐五湘,李冬梅,周飞跃. 基于面板数据的我国各地区科技资源配置效率的评价［J］.科技管理研究,2007(3): 43-46. ［24］王楚鸿,杨干生. 全国高校科技人员投入产出效率分析［J］. 华南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2010(3): 115-120. ［25］黄黎真.基于DEA模型的高校科技创新效率统计研究［J］.湖南工程学院学报,2009,19(4):111-114. ［26］中华人民共和国国家统计局.各种价格指数［EB/OL］.［2010-01-08］．http∥www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/ 2007/indexch.htm.