An Optimization Selection Decision Making Method of Engineering Project Group in Henan Pilot Free Trade Zone Based on Mixed Multi-dimensional Heterogeneity Information

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.04.015

Abstract

Abstract: In order to deal with optimal decision problem of engineering project group with interactive coupling correlation among sub-projects, the positive and negative ideal reference points are determined by the normalized decision matrix based on prospect theory. Based on the vertical distance, the prospect value of each alternative engineering project group under a single criterion is calculated, a nonlinear programming model is built to maximize the sum of the comprehensive prospect value of all the alternative engineering project groups to determine the weight of each criterion. The ranking of alternative engineering projects is selected based on improved TODIM method and according to the total superiority degree. Through sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis, the influence of different parameters on the ranking results is discussed, to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the decision making method.

Key words: engineering project group, hybrid multi-criteria decision making, prospect theory, vertical projection distance, TODIM (tomada de decisao interativa multicriterio) method

CLC Number:

C934

HAN Erdong. An Optimization Selection Decision Making Method of Engineering Project Group in Henan Pilot Free Trade Zone Based on Mixed Multi-dimensional Heterogeneity Information[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(4): 125-133.

References

[1] GUO F, HUANG T. Study on system coupling interaction of large-scale construction companies programme contracting and firm growth[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2015, 2(2): 137-140
[2] 廖佳, 周强. 基于演化博弈的工程项目施工安全管理分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 71-76
LIAO Jia, ZHOU Qiang. Research on project safety management based on evolutionary game theory[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5): 71-76
[3] 何寿奎, 梁功雯, 蒙建波. 基于前景理论的重大工程多主体利益博弈与行为演化机理[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(5): 207-214
HE Shoukui, LIANG Gongwen, MENG Jianbo. Multi-subjects benefit game and behavior evolution mechanism of major engineering based on prospect theory[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(5): 207-214
[4] LIAMAZARES B. An analysis of the generalized TODIM method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 269(3): 1041-1049
[5] 刘熠, 秦亚, 刘好斌, 等. 广义q-ROF TODIM方法及应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(8): 2021-2028
LIU Yi, QIN Ya, LIU Haobin, et al. Generalized q-ROF TODIM method and its application[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(8): 2021-2028
[6] 王霞, 党耀国. 基于改进的TODIM方法的区间灰数多属性决策模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(2): 261-266
WANG Xia, DANG Yaoguo. Multiple attribute decision-making model with interval grey number based on improved TODIM method[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(2): 261-266
[7] 滕剑仑, 吴坚, 余高锋, 等. 考虑决策者行为的水环境审计绩效异质信息多指标综合评价[J]. 控制与决策, 2018, 33(10): 1879-1885
TENG Jianlun, WU Jian, YU Gaofeng, et al. Heterogeneous information and multitude index synthesis evaluation method of water environment audit performance under consideration of DM behaviors[J]. Control and Decision, 2018, 33(10): 1879-1885
[8] 余高锋, 费巍, 叶银芳. 基于前景理论的农村电子商务发展水平多维偏好决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(9): 2182-2188
YU Gaofeng, FEI Wei, YE Yinfang. The developing level of rural E-commerce multidimensional preference decision making method based on prospect theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(9): 2182-2188
[9] 陈伟, 李金秋, 杨早立. 一种基于“垂面”距离和IFE的直觉模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(9): 7-12,20
CHEN Wei, LI Jinqiu, YANG Zaoli. A multi-attribute decision-making method in intuitionistic fuzzy set based on vertical projection distance and IFE[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(9): 7-12,20
[10] 马健, 孙秀霞. 基于效用曲线改进的前景理论价值函数[J]. 信息与控制, 2011, 40(4): 501-506
MA Jian, SUN Xiuxia. Modified value function in prospect theory based on utility curve[J]. Information and Control, 2011, 40(4): 501-506
[11] KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Economica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291