面向电动汽车租赁的多目标服务组合优化设计

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2019.04.015

工业工程 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 101-108.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2019.04.015

面向电动汽车租赁的多目标服务组合优化设计

李奇¹, 苗瑞¹, 张洁², 江志斌¹, 付圆³

1. 上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院, 上海 200240;
2. 东华大学机械工程学院, 上海 201620;
3. 上海国际汽车城新能源汽车运营服务有限公司, 上海 201805

收稿日期:2018-11-02 出版日期:2019-08-31 发布日期:2019-08-23
作者简介:李奇(1994-),男,山西省人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为决策支持
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51435009）

A Multi-objective Optimization Design of Service Portfolio for Electric Vehicle Lease

LI Qi¹, MIAO Rui¹, ZHANG Jie², JIANG Zhibin¹, FU Yuan³

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
2. College of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China;
3. Shanghai International Automobile City New Energy Vehicle Operation Service Co., Ltd. Shanghai 201805, China

Received:2018-11-02 Online:2019-08-31 Published:2019-08-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 电动汽车租赁行业迅速发展。为满足消费者和企业的综合需求，研究了面向电动汽车租赁的多目标服务组合优化设计方法。借助模糊理论确定各服务项权重，引入失望理论描述顾客的欣喜与失望感知以计算感知绩效，建立方案成本、相容度、市场竞争指数的计算方法，最终提出顾客感知绩效最大、成本最低、方案相容最优、市场竞争力最大的电动汽车租赁多目标服务组合优化设计模型。通过一种面向多阶段的多目标权重确定法对不同阶段的多目标决策设定权重。最后，通过实际项目案例对模型进行有效性验证，针对推广市场的不同阶段分别制定服务组合套餐，目标优化结果显著，为电动汽车租赁企业在服务设计方面提供了科学有效的决策方法。

关键词: 服务组合设计, 电动汽车租赁, 多目标优化, 顾客感知绩效

Abstract: The electric vehicle lease industry has developed rapidly. In order to meet the comprehensive needs of both consumers and companies, a multi-objective service portfolio optimization design method for the electric vehicle lease is researched. The fuzzy theory method is used to determine the weight of each service item. The disappointment theory is applied to describe the customer's delight and disappointment perception in order to calculate customer perceived performance. The calculation methods for program cost, compatibility, and market competition index are also established. A multi-objective service portfolio optimization design model of electric vehicle lease with the highest customer perceived performance, the lowest cost, the best program compatibility, and the strongest market competitiveness is finally proposed. A method for determining weights of multi-objective function is designed to set weights for multi-objective decision at different stages. Finally, through an actual case, the validity of the model is verified, which formulates the service portfolio for different stages, the target optimization results are significant, providing a scientific and effective decision-making method for the service design of electric vehicle lease companies.

Key words: service portfolio design, electric vehicle lease, multi-objective optimization, customer perceived utility

中图分类号:

李奇, 苗瑞, 张洁, 江志斌, 付圆. 面向电动汽车租赁的多目标服务组合优化设计[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(4): 101-108.

LI Qi, MIAO Rui, ZHANG Jie, JIANG Zhibin, FU Yuan. A Multi-objective Optimization Design of Service Portfolio for Electric Vehicle Lease[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2019, 22(4): 101-108.

参考文献

[1] MEISEL S, MERFELD T. Economic incentives for the adoption of electric vehicles:a classification and review of e-vehicle services[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2018, 65:264-287
[2] HUANG P, BROTO V C. Interdependence between urban processes and energy transitions:the dimensions of urban energy transitions (DUET) framework[J]. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2018, 28:35-45
[3] MIAO R, HUANG W, PEI D, et al. Research on lease and sale of electric vehicles based on value engineering[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(18):5361-5380
[4] 王宁, 张文剑, 刘向, 等. 电动汽车共享站点间车辆人工调度策略[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(8):1064-1071 WANG Ning, ZHANG Wenjian, LIU Xiang, et al. Inter-site-vehicle artificial scheduling strategy design for electric vehicle sharing[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2018, 46(8):1064-1071
[5] KNAPPER R, FLATH C M, BLAU B S, et al. A multi-attribute service portfolio design problem[C]. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA). Irvine, CA, USA:IEEE, 2011.
[6] MIAO R, CAO J, ZHANG K, et al. Value-added path of service-oriented manufacturing based on structural equation model:the case of electric car rental for instance[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(18):5502-5513
[7] AIT-OUAHMED A, JOSSELIN D, ZHOU F. Relocation optimization of electric cars in one-way car-sharing systems:modeling, exact solving and heuristics algorithms[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(2):367-398
[8] 米雷雨, 苗瑞, 顾希垚, 等. 改进试验设计法优化电动汽车按时间租赁利润[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(2):53-61 MI Leiyu, MIAO Rui, GU Xiyao, et al. A modified design-of-experiment approach to optimize profit of electric vehicle lease for subscription pricing[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2016, 19(2):53-61
[9] STENGER D, ALTHERR L C, MÜLLER T, et al. Product family design optimization using model-based engineering techniques[M]. Operations Research Proceedings 2017. Berlin:Springer, Cham, 2018:495-502.
[10] LIU H T. Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(1):482-496
[11] 姜艳萍, 梁霞, 杨嘉琪. 服务产品设计方案组合的决策方法[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2014, 19(6):22-28 JIANG Yanping, LIANG Xia, YANG Jiaqi. Decision method for alternatives combination in service product design[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2014, 19(6):22-28
[12] TANG D, WANG Q, ULLAH I. Optimisation of product configuration in consideration of customer satisfaction and low carbon[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(12):3349-3373
[13] 丑文亚. 基于模块化产品族的定制电信产品结构建模及配置研究[J]. 电信科学, 2013(1):149-159 CHOU Wenya. Research on customized telecommunication product structural modeling and configuration based on modular product family[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2013(1):149-159
[14] BECKMAN E. Consumer preference and willingness to pay for the tourism packages:a conjoint study of a rural destination[J]. Business and Management Studies, 2018, 4(2):10-16
[15] LIN L Z, HUANG L C, YEH H R. Fuzzy group decision-making for service innovations in quality function deployment[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2012, 21(4):495-517
[16] LI R J. Fuzzy method in group decision making[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 1999, 38(1):91-101
[17] 于超, 张重阳, 樊治平. 考虑顾客感知效用的服务要素优化配置方法[J]. 管理学报, 2015, 12(5):744-749 YU Chao, ZHANG Chongyang, FAN Zhiping. Optimized configuration of service elements considering customer-perceived utility[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, 12(5):744-749
[18] LACIANA C E, WEBER E U. Correcting expected utility for comparisons between alternative outcomes:a unified parameterization of regret and disappointment[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2008, 36(1):1-17
[19] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory:cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4):297-323

面向电动汽车租赁的多目标服务组合优化设计

A Multi-objective Optimization Design of Service Portfolio for Electric Vehicle Lease

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘雪红, 张涛, 彭兆, 王磊. 面向医疗器械企业灭菌工艺的不同容量平行机批调度[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 82-89.
[2]	侯艳, 黄康焕, 张亿仙, 伍乃骐. 原油一次加工过程的多目标调度优化[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(4): 131-139.
[3]	许岩, 赖朝安. 云制造模式下基于多目标非合作博弈的服务租赁定价策略[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(1): 112-118,133.
[4]	苏庆, 林昊, 谢国波, 林志毅. 基于NSGA-II的多目标代码混淆模型研究[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(5): 10-18.
[5]	许春安, 李芳. 面向云制造服务的制造资源优化配置研究[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(3): 44-51,109.
[6]	郑斐峰, 梅启煌, 刘明, 张小宁. 多港口集装箱配载的双目标精确算法研究[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(6): 1-6.
[7]	郝志刚. 考虑医患满意度和手术成本的日手术排程方法[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(4): 49-56,71.
[8]	沈晓冰, 杨保华. 基于双层混合联运的震后应急物资配送模糊多目标优化[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(3): 113-117.
[9]	李志1，江舟2，周愉峰1. 基于灰色聚类评估的配送中心选址模糊多目标优化模型[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(5): 24-32.
[10]	袁清和, 殷宪辉，贾顺，许雪洁. 基于多目标混料设计的重介质旋流器混料成分配比[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(3): 130-137.
[11]	米雷雨，苗瑞，顾希垚，吴易洲，赵赫. 改进试验设计法优化电动汽车按时间租赁利润[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(2): 53-61.
[12]	钮建伟1，秦洁1，丁文英1，温薇1，于洋1，王道平2. 基于资源限制的多目标网络计划优化模型[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(6): 116-124.
[13]	何梦莹, 徐梅, 张宁波, 晏福. 基于启发式算法的乘用车物流运输问题分析[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 141-147.
[14]	李恒，陈淮莉，徐朗. 客户偏好约束下的网络零售配送时隙分配优化[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(3): 36-41.
[15]	李明1,2，徐哲1，廖婷婷1. 项目员工加班调度多目标优化模型与算法[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(1): 37-43.