公平关切下“前置仓模式”生鲜供应链决策与协调研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2021.06.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对由生鲜产品供应商和“前置仓模式”下的生鲜电商组成的二级供应链保鲜努力水平和“最后一公里服务”努力水平偏低的问题，从公平关切视角探究其原因。运用博弈论方法，通过建立Nash讨价还价模型，分析与比较不同公平关切情形下供应链主体的最优决策以及与之对应的收益和效用。结果表明，供应商的公平关切会降低生鲜电商保鲜努力水平和“最后一公里服务”努力水平，而且供应链成员的公平关切总是伴随着各自渠道收益比的提升和供应链总效用的损失。最后，通过设计“收益共享+成本分担”混合契约，提高电商保鲜努力水平和“最后一公里服务”努力水平，使供应链总效用达到最优。数值分析验证了相关结论。

关键词: 前置仓模式, 公平关切, 保鲜努力, “最后一公里服务”努力, 混合契约

Abstract: In view of the low level of fresh-keeping efforts and “last kilometer service” efforts of the two-echelon supply chain consisting of a fresh product supplier and an online fresh product retailer in "pre-position warehouse mode", the reasons were explored from the perspective of fairness concern. By using the game theory method and establishing the Nash bargaining model, optimal decision-makings as well as the earnings and utility of the supply chain were analyzed and compared under different fairness concern conditions. The result indicates that the supplier's fairness concern can lower the online retailer's fresh-keeping efforts and the “last kilometer service” efforts. Moreover, fairness concerns of supply chain members are generally accompanied by an increase of their earnings ratio and the loss of the total supply chain utility. Finally, the efforts level of fresh-keeping and “last kilometer service” can both be improved, and the total utility of the supply chain can be optimized by the hybrid contract which emphasizes earnings and cost sharing. The result was verified by a numerical analysis.

Key words: pre-position warehouse mode, fairness concern, fresh-keeping efforts, “last kilometer service” efforts, hybrid contract

中图分类号:

F224.32

张娜娜, 卢丽娟, 简兆权. 公平关切下“前置仓模式”生鲜供应链决策与协调研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(6): 150-157.

ZHANG Nana, LU Lijuan, JIAN Zhaoquan. A Research on Decision-makings and Coordination of Fresh-product Supply Chain in “Pre-Position Warehouse Mode” under Fairness Concern[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2021, 24(6): 150-157.

参考文献

[1] CAI X, CHEN J, XIAO Y, et al. Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(4): 752-765
[2] WU Q, MU Y, FENG Y. Coordinating contracts for fresh product outsourcing logistics channels with power structures[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 160: 94-105
[3] 王道平, 李昕怡, 张博卿. 考虑两阶段价格的生鲜农产品供应链协调研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(5): 16-22
WANG Daoping, LI Xinyi, ZHANG Boqing. Study on coordination of fresh agricultural products supply chain based on two-phase pricing[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2016, 21(5): 16-22
[4] 曹裕, 李业梅, 万光羽. 基于消费者效用的生鲜农产品供应链生鲜度激励机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(2): 160-174.
CAO Yu, LI Yemei, WAN Guangyu. Study on the fresh degree incentive mechanism of fresh agricultural product supply chain based on consumer utility[J] Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(2): 160-174.
[5] 王道平, 朱梦影, 王婷婷. 考虑时间约束的生鲜供应链保鲜努力成本分担契约研究[J/OL]. (2019-07-24). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1738.T.20190724.1215.012.html.
[6] 史保阳, 史保莉. 考虑努力水平与损耗的农超对接生鲜产品供应链协调[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2019, 24(5): 43-48, 55
SHI Baoyang, SHI Baoli. Fresh agricultural product supply chain coordination considering the level of effort and the loss[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2019, 24(5): 43-48, 55
[7] ZHENG Q, IEROMONACHOU P, FAN T, et al. Supply chain contracting coordination for fresh products with fresh-keeping effort[J/OL]. (2017-04-10). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.118/IMDS-04-2016-0139/full/html.
[8] SONG Z, HE S. Contract coordination of new fresh produce three-layer supply chain[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2019, 119(1): 148-169
[9] CUI H, JAGMOHAN S R, ZHANG Z. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8): 1303-1314
[10] 孙玉玲, 洪美娜, 石岿然. 考虑公平关切的鲜活农产品供应链收益共享契约[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(6): 103-111
SUN Yuling, HONG Meina, SHI Kuiran. Revenue sharing contract of supply chain for fresh agricultural products considering fairness concerns[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(6): 103-111
[11] 张庆, 张旭. 不同公平关切行为下的生鲜农产品供应链定价策略[J]. 系统工程, 2016, 34(9): 93-100
ZHANG Qing, ZHANG Xu. Pricing strategy of fresh agricultural supply chain under different behaviors of fairness concerns[J]. Systems Engineering, 2016, 34(9): 93-100
[12] 张旭, 张庆. 零售商公平关切下的生鲜品供应链协调机制[J]. 系统工程学报, 2017, 32(4): 461-473
ZHANG Xu, ZHANG Qing. Coordination mechanism for fresh agricultural supply chain under the retailer's fairness concerns[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(4): 461-473
[13] CHINTAGUNTA P K, JAIN D. A dynamic model of channel member strategies for marketing expenditures[J]. Marketing Science, 1992, 11(2): 168-188
[14] MOON I, JEONG J Y, SAHA S. Investment and coordination decisions in a supply chain of fresh agricultural products[DB/OL]. (2018-06-06). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12351-018-0411-4.
[15] SONG H, GAO X. Green supply chain game model and analysis under revenue-sharing contract[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 183-192
[16] YU Y, XIAO T. Pricing and cold-chain service level decisions in a fresh agri-products supply chain with logistics outsourcing[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 111: 56-66
[17] YANG L, TANG R. Comparisons of sales modes for a fresh product supply chain with freshness-keeping effort[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 125: 425-448
[18] 曹裕, 刘培培, 胡韩莉. 基于成本共担契约的生鲜供应链保鲜努力机制研究[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 35(1): 1-10
CAO Yu, LIU Peipei, HU Hanli. Freshness efforts mechanism of fresh-keeping supply chain based on cost sharing contract[J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 35(1): 1-10
[19] 杜少甫, 朱贾昂, 高冬, 等. Nash讨价还价公平参考下的供应链优化决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3): 68-72
DU Shaofu, ZHU Jiaang, GAO Dong, et al. Optimal decision-making for Nash bargaining fairness concerned newsvendor in two-level supply chain[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2013, 16(3): 68-72