考虑竞争性分析的改进模糊重要度绩效分析方法

工业工程 ›› 2014, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 68-74.

考虑竞争性分析的改进模糊重要度绩效分析方法

(上海理工大学管理学院，上海 200093)

出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-12-01
作者简介:耿秀丽(1984-)，女，山东省人，讲师，博士，主要研究方向为产品服务系统、服务科学、产品/服务方案设计技术等.
基金资助:
国家自然科学青年基金资助项目（71301104）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题（20133120120002, 20120073110096）;上海市教育委员会科研创新资助项目（14YZ088）;上海市一流学科资助项目（S1201YLXK）;上海理工大学人文社会科学基金资助项目（13XSY06）;上海理工大学博士启动基金资助项目（ID-10-303-002）

A Revised Fuzzy Importance Performance Analysis Considering Competitive Analysis

(Business School, University of Shanghai for Science of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 重要度绩效分析（IPA）是顾客满意度评价的常用方法，分析结果是产品/服务改进设计的重要依据。）为处理顾客评价信息的不确定性，采用模糊集方法表达并处理重要度和绩效评价信息。针对传统IPA方法中，属性绩效值的获取没有考虑市场竞争因素的问题，提出了考虑竞争性分析的改进模糊IPA方法。灰色关联分析法用来计算属性的市场竞争性系数，以修正顾客群决策得到的初始属性绩效评价值。考虑到属性之间存在影响关系，DEMATEL方法用来分析属性的影响和被影响程度，以修正顾客群决策得到的初始属性重要度评价值。以某电子产品的顾客满意度分析为例，验证了所提方法的有效性。

关键词: , 顾客满意度；重要度绩效分析；灰色关联分析；决策与试验评价试验室方法；模糊理论

Abstract: Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) is a commonly used customer satisfaction evaluation approach, and the analysis result is the important basis of product/service improvement design. In order to deal with the uncertainty of the customer′s evaluation information, fuzzy set approach was applied to express and handle the important degree information and performance information. Aiming at the problem that the traditional IPA does not consider the market competitive aspect in acquiring the attribute′s performance evaluation, a revised fuzzy IPA considering competitive analysis was proposed. Grey relational analysis was used to calculate the attribute′s competitive coefficient in order to amend the attribute′s initial performance evaluation given by customer group decision-making. Taking into consideration that there exist mutual influence relationships among attributes, DEMATEL was applied to analyze the difference level of the attribute impacting others and being impacted by others to modify the initial importance degree given by customer decision-making. Finally, a case study of customer satisfaction evaluation of an electronic product was presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Key words: customer satisfaction degree, importance performance analysis (IPA), grey relational analysis, decision making trial and evaluation laboratory method (DEMATEL), fuzzy theory

耿秀丽，李易林. 考虑竞争性分析的改进模糊重要度绩效分析方法[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(5): 68-74.

Geng Xiu-li, Li Yi-lin . A Revised Fuzzy Importance Performance Analysis Considering Competitive Analysis[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2014, 17(5): 68-74.

参考文献

［1］Deng W. Using a revised importanceperformance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism ［J］. Tourism Management, 2007, 28(5): 1274-1284. ［2］Chang C C. Improving employment services management using IPA technique ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(17):6948-6954. ［3］Matzler K, Sauerwein E. The factor structure of customer satisfaction ［J］.International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2002, 13(4): 314-332. ［4］Garver M S. Using data mining for customer satisfaction research ［J］. Marketing Research, 2002, 14(1):8-12. ［5］Deng W J, Chen W C, Pei W. Backpropagation neural network based importanceperformance analysis for determining critical service attributes ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008, 34(2) :1115-1125. ［6］谭远玲,褚学宁,张在房.基于粗糙集的改进重要度绩效分析法［J］. 计算机集成制造系统, 2011, 17(7): 1374-1380. Tan Yuan-ling, Chu Xue-ning, Zhang Zai-fang. Revised importance performance analysis based on rough set theory ［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2011, 17(7):1374-1380. ［7］Taplin R H. The value of selfstated attribute importance to overall satisfaction ［J］. Tourism Management, 2012, 33(2): 295-304. ［8］门峰. 模糊集理论与灰色关联理论的FMEA方法［J］. 工业工程,2008, 11(4):109-117. Men Feng. FMEA method based upon fuzzy set theory and grey relational theory ［J］. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2008, 11(4):109-117. ［9］梁秋龙, 明新国, 徐志涛，等. 基于灰色关联分析的供应商绩效评价［J］. 机械设计与研究, 2012, 28(6): 96-102. Liang Qiu-long, Ming Xin-guo, Xu Zhitao, et al. A study of supplier performance evaluation based on grey relevancy analysis ［J］. Machine Design and Research, 2012, 28(6): 96-102. ［10］肖丁丁, 张文峰.基于DEMATEL方法的绿色物流发展关键因素分析［J］. 工业工程, 2010, 13(1): 52-57. Xiao Dingding, Zhang Wenfeng. Key element analysis for green logistics development by using decision making trial and evaluation laboratory method ［J］. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2010, 13(1): 52-57. ［11］Wu W W, Lee Y T. Developing global managers′ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2007, 32(2): 499-507. ［12］Lin C J, Wu W W. A causal analytical method for group decisionmaking under fuzzy environment ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008, 34(1):205-213. Research management, 2011, 32(4):69-75.

[1]	曾令鹤1, 吴文建2, 史乐峰3 . 基于PPP模式的电动汽车充电服务定价模型[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 25-29.
[2]	陈晔，曹帅，徐海燕，卢波. 以顾客需求导向的产品评价体系构建研究[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 30-35.
[3]	章添霞，李慧. 考虑运输速度和碳排放的易腐食品供应链网络优化研究[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 83-89.
[4]	荆旭1,3，李春华2, 范秀敏3，何其昌3. 基于驾驶员身体特征和操作姿态的汽车内饰按键操作便捷性建模[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 122-130.
[5]	万方华1, 王晓琪2, 张洪3, 丁诗泳3, 陈建国1, 王通德1, 潘文斌1. 基于KPLS的滚动轴承装配质量预测[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 136-139.
[6]	胡荣，李东亚，江超，许跃凤. 基于多航线产品的航空公司市场价格竞争研究[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 1-7.
[7]	贺晓虎，谢勇，王红卫. 酒品包装生产中动态缓冲管理机制[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(1): 66-73.
[8]	黄放1，孙林辉2，陈菊红1，孙瑜2，程玉孔2. 网店从业人员MSDs的职业病研究[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(1): 97-101.
[9]	杨勇1, 付强1, 史慧2. 二部制契约下供应链内外部融资模式比较分析[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(1): 129-134.
[10]	桂达1, 朱海平1, 廖嘉伟1，杨馥铭1, 余志强2. 基于混合算法的飞机多层次装配计划优化及应用[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(6): 8-18.
[11]	葛安华，邹银萍. 基于价值流的S生产线的精益改善研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(6): 19-25.
[12]	黄明田1,2,储雪俭1,2. 基于RFID和二维码技术应用的服装电商物流运作模式研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(6): 49-54.
[13]	董克1,2，吕文元1. 旧设备租赁的周期预防维护策略优化[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 14-19.
[14]	陈淑玲1,2，李铁克1,2，王柏琳1,2. 考虑加班因素的订单接受问题优化模型与算法[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(2): 1-08.
[15]	安岩, 邹志红, 王晓静. 基于粗糙集理论的水质模糊综合评价[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(1): 1-05.