基于评分法的测量系统能力评价

工业工程 ›› 2015, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 1-06.

• 专题论述 • 下一篇

基于评分法的测量系统能力评价

（天津大学管理与经济学部，天津 300072）

出版日期:2015-10-31 发布日期:2016-03-24
作者简介:施亮星(1977-)，男，云南省人，副教授,博士,主要研究方向为质量管理、工业工程.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71102140); 国家杰出青年基金资助项目(71225006)

A Research on Measurement System Capability Evaluation Based on Scoring Rule

(College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Online:2015-10-31 Published:2016-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前所用的测量系统能力评价方法是建立在正态性假设的基础上，如果测量系统误差不满足正态性，运用原来的评价指标在对测量系统能力进行评价的过程中会发生误判。将连续等级概率评分(CRPS)应用到测量系统分析评价当中，通过研究CRPS的相关特性，建立了基于CRPS评分法的测量系统能力评价指标，从而使测量系统误差非正态分布时，对测量系统能力进行评价的过程中不会发生误判。通过案例分析表明，当测量系统误差为正态分布时，运用CRPS和运用传统评价指标给出的评价结果是一致的，同时，CRPS评价方法能够有效实现非正态测量系统误差情形下的测量系统能力评价。

关键词: 连续等级概率评分(CRPS), 测量系统分析, 非正态分布, 评价指标

Abstract: The existing measurement system capability evaluation methods are established on the basis of the normality assumption. However, when the measurement system error distributes non-normally, they are not appropriate. A CRPS based method is proposed. To illustrate it, examples are given. They show that when the measurement system error distributes normally, the evaluation results given by CRPS and the traditional evaluation indicators are consistent. Meanwhile, CRPS can effectively implement the measurement system capability evaluation of non-normal measurement system error.

Key words: continuous ranked probability score (CRPS), measurement system analysis, nonnormal distribution, evaluation indicator

施亮星，马红叶，何桢. 基于评分法的测量系统能力评价[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 1-06.

Shi Liang-xing, Ma Hong-ye, He Zhen. A Research on Measurement System Capability Evaluation Based on Scoring Rule[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2015, 18(5): 1-06.

参考文献

［1］何桢, 生静, 施亮星. 测量系统的R&R分析在企业质量改进中的应用［J］. 工业工程, 2003, 6(1): 62-66. He Zhen, Sheng Jing, Shi Liang-xing. Application of R&R analysis of measurement system analysis in enterprise quality improvement［J］. Industrial Engineering, 2003, 6(1): 62-66. ［2］Automotive Industry Action Group. Measurement system analysis reference manual［M］. 3rd Edition. Troy, Mich: Automotive Industry Action Group, 2002: 55-73. ［3］Montgomery D C. Statistical quality control: a modern introduction［M］. 6th Edition. New York: John Wiley& Sons Inc, 2009: 370-371. ［4］Burdick R K, Borror C M, Montgomery D C. A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis［J］. Journal of Quality Technology, 2003, 35(4): 342-354. ［5］Epstein E S. A scoring system for probability forecasts of ranked categories［J］. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1969,8(6): 985-987. ［6］Candille G, Talagrand O. Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems for a scalar variable［J］. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2005,131(609): 2131-2150. ［7］Hersbach H. Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems［J］. Weather and Forecasting, 2000,15(5): 559-570. ［8］Brcker J. Evaluating raw ensembles with the continuous ranked probability score［J］. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2012,138(667): 1611-1617. ［9］Biondi D, De Luca D L. Performance assessment of a Bayesian Forecasting System (BFS) for realtime flood forecasting［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,479(1): 51-63. ［10］Gneiting T, Raftery A E, Westveld III A H, et al. Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation［J］. Monthly Weather Review, 2005, 133(5): 1098-1118. ［11］Grimit E P, Gneiting T, Berrocal V J, et al. The continuous ranked probability score for circular variables and its application to mesoscale forecast ensemble verification［J］. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2006,132(621C): 2925-2942. ［12］Friedman D. Effective scoring rules for probabilistic forecasts［J］. Management Science, 1983, 29(4): 447-454. ［13］Nau R F. Should scoring rules be “effective”?［J］. Management Science, 1985, 31(5): 527-535. ［14］Houf R E, Berman D B. Statistical analysis of power module thermal test equipment performance［J］. Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 1988, 11(4): 516-520.

[1]	伍绍青, 桂科, 刘江南. 支持规避设计的海量专利质量评价模型[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(3): 86-92,109.
[2]	王德意, 赵承, 杨国清, 贾嵘, 李平. 基于集对分析法的架空输电线路状态评价[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(5): 72-78.
[3]	张重阳1，樊治平1，于超1，徐皓2. 考虑顾客给出服务期望容忍区间的服务质量评价方法[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(2): 88-94.
[4]	赵会珍, 杨亚楠. 卫浴产品生产过程质量控制研究[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(1): 60-63.
[5]	范璐1，贾振虎2，涂传清3，王爱虎2. 通信运营商定制移动终端物流服务商选择研究[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(6): 42-47.
[6]	赵会珍, 赵虎. 常闭阀罩生产过程质量控制研究[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(5): 29-34.
[7]	吴小芳，何桢，施亮星. 基于广义置信区间的测量系统能力比较[J]. 工业工程, 2014, 17(5): 64-67.
[8]	李荔1, 孙建强2, 周晓辉3，朱艳4. 知识产权实务型人才关键能力评价指标权重研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(4): 67-72.
[9]	薛丽. 基于田口质量损失函数的非正态EWMA控制图优化设计[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(5): 75-78.

基于评分法的测量系统能力评价

A Research on Measurement System Capability Evaluation Based on Scoring Rule

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价