基于犹豫模糊语言术语的供应商多准则群决策研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.e17-3234

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对全球价值链环境下供应商科学决策问题，提出基于不确定语言术语的多准则群决策模型。首先分别提取专家的偏好信息，将偏好信息转化为犹豫模糊语言术语，引入不确定语言变量进行词计算；其次，运用包络算子融合专家的偏好信息形成犹豫模糊语言术语集，设计集成准则权重的相对贴近度进行产品供应商排序，确定最满意供应商；此外，引入信息熵求解决策过程无先验知识的多准则权重；计算结果表明：3种信息熵参数条件下最满意汽车零部件供应商选择结果完全一致，基于相对贴近度值的供应商优劣排序结果相对于信息熵参数变化不敏感；验证了所提模型可行性、有效性和稳定性，为汽车零部件供应商的实际评价与选择提供有益借鉴。

关键词: 犹豫模糊集, 信息熵, 多准则, 群决策

Abstract: In order to make scientific decisions of suppliers under the global value chain environment, a multi-criteria group decision-making model based on uncertain linguistic terms was proposed. Preference information, first elicited from experts, was transformed into hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms and computed with words via uncertain linguistic variables. The expert group's preference information was then fused by the envelope operator and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set built. Then the relative closeness coefficient was adopted to sort the production suppliers. Consequently, the most satisfactory supplier was selected. In addition, information entropy was proposed for solving the weights without prior knowledge of multi-criteria decision-making process. The results show that the most satisfactory selection results are the same under 3 different information entropy parameters. Moreover, the ranking results of the relative closeness coefficient for supplier selections are not sensitive to the change of information entropy parameters, which verifies the feasibility, effectiveness and stability of the proposed model. Therefore, the proposed model can provide a useful reference for the practical application of auto parts suppliers' evaluation and selection.

Key words: hesitant fuzzy sets, information entropy, multi-criteria, group decision-making

中图分类号:

F270

彭建刚, 夏光. 基于犹豫模糊语言术语的供应商多准则群决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 73-82.

PENG Jiangang, XIA Guang. A Research on Multiple Criteria Group Decision-making of Suppliers Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Terms[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2018, 21(1): 73-82.

参考文献

[1] 尹超, 吕海涛, 刘飞, 等. 摩托车零部件企业网络化外协加工支持系统[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2009, 15(2): 369-376.
YIN Chao, LU Haitao, LIU Fei, et al. Networked management system for outsourcing of motorcycle parts factory[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(2): 369-376.
[2] 尹超, 李涛, 刘飞, 等. 网络化外协加工资源选择的决策框架模型及应用[J]. 机械工程学报, 2010, 46(19): 133-139.
YIN Chao, Li Tao, LIU Fei, et al. Decision-making framework model for networked outsourcing resources selection[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(19): 133-139.
[3] DURSUN M KARSAK E E. A QFD-based fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selection[J]. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2013, 37(8): 5864-5875.
[4] 秦娟, 陈振颂, 李延来. 考虑专家风险偏好的物流服务供应商选择研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(2): 41-48.
QIN Juan, CHEN Zhensong, LI Yanlai. The selection of logistics service suppliers considering experts' risk preference[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2016, 21(2): 41-48.
[5] 王妮, 孙建民, 李凯, 等. 一种基于聚类分析与熵权模糊评价的虚拟企业综合决策算法研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(3): 25-31.
WANG Ni, SUN Jianmin, LI Kai, et al. A comprehensive decision algorithm based on cluster analysis and entropy weight fuzzy evaluation for virtual enterprise [J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2016, 21(3): 25-31
[6] 刘学鹏, 齐二石, 刘亮. 面向复杂产品制造的两阶段供应商候选库的构建[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(6): 31-37.
LIU Xuepeng, QI Ershi, LIU Liang. Two-stage suppliers pre-selection process design for complex product manufacturing [J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2016, 21(6): 31-37.
[7] 钟金宏, 白阳. 面向复杂产品开发供应商选择的改进BN模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(1): 175-182.
ZHONG Jinhong, BAI Yang. Improved Bayesian network model for supplier selection of complicated product development[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(1): 175-182.
[8] 胡笑旋, 陈意. 深度不确定环境下的决策分析方法——研究现状与展望[J]. 控制与决策, 2015, 30(3): 387-394.
HU Xiaoxuan, CHEN Yi. Decision analysis under deep uncertainty-present situation and prospect[J]. Control and Decision, 2015, 30(3): 387-394.
[9] 许叶军, 达庆利. 基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的多属性群决策方法[J]. 管理工程学报, 2009, 23(2): 69-73.
XU Yejun, DA Qingli. Approach based on multi-granularity linguistic judgment matrices in multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009, 23(2): 69-73.
[10] 李延来, 唐加福, 姚建明, 等. 基于粗糙集理论的质量屋中工程特性确定方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2008, 14(2): 386-392.
LI Yanlai, TANG Jiafu, YAO Jianming, et al. Engineering characteristics determining method in house of quality based on rough set theory[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2008, 14(2): 386-392.
[11] 王晓暾, 熊伟. 复杂语言信息环境中顾客需求重要度的确定方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2010, 16(7): 1472-1479.
WANG Xiaotun, XIONG Wei. Importance ratings determining of customer requirements in complex linguistic information environment[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16(7): 1472-1479.
[12] 刘培德, 张新. 直觉不确定语言集成算子及在群决策中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(12): 2704-2711.
LIU Peide, ZHANG Xin. Intuitionistic uncertain linguistic aggregation operators and their application to group decision making[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2012, 32(12): 2704-2711.
[13] 方辉, 谭建荣, 殷国富, 等. 基于改进不确定语言多属性决策的设计方案评价[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2009, 15(7): 1257-1269.
FANG Hui, TAN Jianrong, YIN Guofu, et al. Design scheme evaluation based on improved uncertain language multi-attributed decision-making method[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(7): 1257-1269.
[14] 彭勃, 叶春明. 基于不确定纯语言混合调和平均算子的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 131-138.
PENG Bo, YE Chunming. An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on uncertain pure linguistic hybrid harmonic averaging operator[J]. Chinese Management Science, 2015, 32(2): 131-138.
[15] 吴坚, 曹清玮, 李辉. 模糊决策环境下基于COWA 算子的绿色供应商选择方法[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010, 24(3): 61-65.
WU Jian, CAO Qingwei, LI Hui. A method for choosing green supplier based on COWA operator under fuzzy linguistic decision-making[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2010, 24(3): 61-65.
[16] 秦娟, 李延来, 陈振颂. 基于极大熵配置模型与Choquet积分的物流供应商选择群决策方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2015, 21(10): 2746-2759.
QING Juan, LI Yanlai, CHEN Zhensong. Group decision making method for supplier selection based on maximum entropy optimization model and Choquet integral[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 21(10): 2746-2759.
[17] CID-LÓPEZA A, HORNOSA M J, CARRASCOB R A, et al. Applying a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model to the analysis of ICT suppliers' offers[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2016, 57: 127-138.
[18] ZADEH Lotfi A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8: 338-353.
[19] PARSONS S. Current approaches to handling imperfect information in data and knowledge bases [J]. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 1996, 8(3): 353-372.
[20] LIU H W, WANG G J. Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 179(1): 220-233.
[21] WEI C, ZHAO N, TANG X. A novel linguistic group decision-making model based on extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 23(3): 379-398.
[22] TORRA V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25 (6): 529-539.
[23] RODRÍGUEZ R M, MARTÍNEZ L, HERRERA F. A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 241: 28-42.
[24] WANG Jianqiang, WANG Jing, CHEN Qinghui, et al. An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 289: 338-351.
[25] WANG Jing, WANG Jianqiang, ZHANG Hongyu. Multi-criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: an outranking approach[J]. Knowledge-based systems, 2015, 86: 224-236.
[26] LIAO H C, XU Z S, ZENG X J, et al. Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Knowledge-based Systems, 2015, 76: 127-138.
[27] JOSHI D, KUMAR S. Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(1): 183-191.
[28] KAHRAMAN C, OZTAYSI B, ONAR, SC. A Comprehensive literature review of 50 years of fuzzy set theory[J], International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2016, SI(9): 3-24.
[29] BUSTINCE H, BARRENECHEA E, PAGOLA M, et al. A historical account of types of fuzzy sets and their relationships[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 24(1): 179-194.
[30] 刘小弟, 朱建军, 刘思峰. 犹豫模糊信息下的双向投影决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(10): 2637-2644.
LIU X D, ZHU J J, LIU S F. Bidirectional projection method with hesitant fuzzy information[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(10): 2637-2644.
[31] RODRÍGUEZ Rosa M, MARTÍNEZ Luis, Herrera Francisco. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 20(1): 109-119.
[32] FARHADINIA B. Multiple criteria decision-making methods with completely unknown weights in hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setting[J]. Knowledge-based Systems, 2016, 93: 135-144.
[33] ZADEH Lotfi A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning-Part I[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 8: 199-249.
[34] ZADEH Lotfi A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning-Part Ⅱ[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 8: 301-357.
[35] ZADEH Lotfi A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning-Part Ⅲ[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 9: 43-80.
[36] HERRERA F, HERRERA-VIEDMA E. Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 120(1): 144-161.
[37] MENG F, CHEN X, ZHANG Q. Multi-attribute decision analysis under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 267: 287-305.
[38] ZADEH Lotfi A. Fuzzy Logic=Computing with Words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1996, 4(2): 103-111.