联合创新视角下的绿色供应链双重治理策略研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.230119

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同环境规制政策之间的协同效应，最大程度提升供应链企业绿色创新，利用博弈论和决策优化方法，从联合创新视角研究政府补贴和碳减排规制这两种治理策略下绿色供应链的市场绩效及社会绿色绩效。考虑单位绿色产品的碳减排约束，引入K-T条件建立并求解制造商单独创新 (IM) 以及联合创新 (UG) 下的政府补贴模型，并对结果进行对比分析。研究发现，只有当碳减排约束超过某一阈值时，双重治理策略才能形成，否则仅补贴策略有效。相比于单补贴策略，双重治理策略能实现更高的单位产品碳减排水平，有利于增加绿色产品的市场需求，但不利于提升制造商的经济利润，也不利于发挥联合创新模式的优势。两种治理策略在提高消费者剩余和社会总福利方面存在正向协同效应，在实现联合创新社会价值方面则呈负向协同。

关键词: 政府补贴, 碳减排规制, 绿色供应链, 联合创新

Abstract: To explore the synergistic effects between different environmental regulatory policies and maximize the motivation for green innovation among supply chain enterprises, game theory and decision optimization methods are used to investigate the market performance and social green performance of green supply chains with two governance strategies of government subsidies and carbon emission reduction regulations from the perspective of joint innovation. Considering carbon emission reduction constraints per unit green product, K-T conditions are introduced to establish and solve the government subsidy models with manufacturer individual innovation (IM) and joint innovation (UG). Results are then compared and analyzed. It is found that only when the carbon emission reduction constraint exceeds a certain threshold can the dual governance strategy be effective, otherwise only the subsidy strategy is effective. Compared to the single subsidy strategy, the dual governance strategy can achieve a higher level of carbon emission reduction per unit of product, which helps to increase the market demand for green products. However, it does not benefit the profits of manufacturers, and does not fully leverage the advantage of the joint innovation model. The two governance strategies have positive synergistic effects in improving consumer surplus and total social welfare, but negative synergistic effects in realizing the social value of joint innovation.

Key words: government subsidy, carbon emission reduction regulation, green supply chain, joint innovation

中图分类号:

F270.5
F406

高鹏, 王志华. 联合创新视角下的绿色供应链双重治理策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2024, 27(4): 93-101.

GAO Peng, WANG Zhihua. Dual Governance Strategies of Green Supply Chains from the Perspective of Joint Innovation[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2024, 27(4): 93-101.

参考文献

[1] 秦立公, 张勇. 碳限额与碳交易下考虑时间偏好差异的供应链联合减排动态博弈[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(5): 55-64
QIN Ligong, ZHANG Yong. Dynamic game of supply chain joint emission reduction considering time preference difference under carbon quota and carbon trading[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(5): 55-64
[2] 环球网. 精益制造绿色出行, 佳通荣获上汽通用“优秀绿色供应商奖”[EB/OL]. 2017[2017-1-15]. http://www.sohu.com/a/123481419_162522.
[3] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 86-95
ZHU Qinghua, DOU Yijie. A game model for green supply chain management based on government subsidies[J]. Jounal of Management Science in China, 2011, 14(6): 86-95
[4] 董爱, 张宏. 城市综合管廊PPP项目政府补贴模式研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2023, 44(2): 21-28.
DONG Ai, ZHANG Hong. Research on government subsidy model of PPP project of urban comprehensive pipe corridor[J]. Construction Economy, 2023,44 (2):21-28.
[5] JUNG S H, FENG T. Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 286(2): 726-739
[6] 苏昕, 周升师. 双重环境规制、政府补助对企业创新产出的影响及调节[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2019, 29(3): 31-39
SU Xin, ZHOU Shengshi. Dual environmental regulation, government subsidy and enterprise innovation output[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(3): 31-39
[7] RAZ G, DRUEHL C T, BLASS V. Design for the environment: Life-cycle approach using a newsvendor model[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2013, 22(4): 940-957
[8] 杨光勇, 计国君. 碳排放规制与顾客环境意识对绿色创新的影响[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(3): 702-712
YANG Guangyong, JI Guojun. Impacts and carbon emmision regulation and consumer environmental consciousness on green innovation[J]. System Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2021, 41(3): 702-712
[9] CACHON G. Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(8): 1907-1925
[10] SINAYI M, RASTI-BARZOKI M. A game theoretic approach for pricing, greening, and social welfare policies in a supply chain with government intervention[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 196: 1443-1458
[11] ELHEDHLI S, MERRICK R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2012, 17(5): 370-379
[12] ZHANG X, YOUSAF H. Green supply chain coordination considering government intervention, green investment, and customer green preferences in the petroleum industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 246: 1-7
[13] ZHU W, HE Y. Green product design in supply chains under competition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258(1): 165-180
[14] WANG Y, CHANG X, CHEN Z, et al. Impact of subsidy policies on recycling and remanufacturing using system dynamics methodology: a case of auto parts in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 74: 161-171
[15] MENG Q, WANG Y, ZHANG Z, et al. Supply chain green innovation subsidy strategy considering consumer heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 281: 1-16
[16] HOSSEIN K, STANKO D, SEYED R H. Pricing, greening, and transparency decisions considering the impact of government subsidies and CSR behavior in supply chain decisions[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021, 60: 102485
[17] SABZEVAR N, ENNSA S, JOULE B J, et al. Modeling competitive firms' performance under price-sensitive demand and cap-and-trade emissions constraints[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 184: 193-209
[18] SUBRAMANIAN R, GUPTA S, TALBOT B. Compliance strategies under permits of emissions[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2010, 16(6): 763-779
[19] 王善勇, 李军, 范进, 等. 个人碳交易视角下消费者能源消费与福利变化研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(6): 1512-1524
WANG Shanyong, LI Jun, FAN Jin, et al. Study on consumer's energy consumption and welfare changes under the personal carbon trading scheme[J]. System Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(6): 1512-1524
[20] QI Q, WANG J, BAI Q. Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 151(5): 286-302
[21] MURALI K, LIM M K, PETRUZZI N C. The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2019, 21(3): 519-535