The Impact of Government Fiscal Behavior on the Manufacturer′s Decision under the Background of Low-carbon

Abstract

Abstract:

Subsidies and taxation are the common strategies in the practice of carbon emission reduction in China. Based on consumer and producer surplus theory, the objective function of social welfare is established. The four kinds of government subsidies and taxing acts are compared. The impact of government subsidies and taxation on the decision making of carbon products and noncarbon products is analyzed. At the same time, the equilibrium price, equilibrium output, equilibrium profit and social welfare of the two products are analyzed. Studies have indicated that with the government′s intervention in the lowcarbon supply chain, the social welfare will be increased, but that it is better for the government to increase the general welfare of the society by subsidizing low carbon product manufacturers than by only taxing highcarbon product manufacturers and that a comprehensive consideration of taxation and subsidy policy is better than both.

Key words: low carbon economy, consumer utility, government behavior, social welfare

XU Lang, WANG Chuanxu, YANG Qingquan. The Impact of Government Fiscal Behavior on the Manufacturer′s Decision under the Background of Low-carbon[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2016, 19(3): 30-36.

References

［1］YUAN Jiahai, KANG Junjie, YU Cong, et al. Energy conservation and emissions reduction in China: Progress and prospective［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(9): 4334-4347.
［2］WANG Feng, YIN Haitao, LI Shoude. China′s renewable energy policy: Commitments and challenges［J］. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(4): 1872-1878.
［3］ZHOU Nan, LEVINE Mark, PRICE Lynn. Overview of current energyefficiency policies in China［J］. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6439-6452.
［4］ZHANG Da, KARPLUS V J, CASSISA C, et al. Emissions trading in China: Progress and prospects［J］. Energy Policy, 2014, 75(3): 9-16.
［5］LI Jun, WANG Xin. Energy and climate policy in China′s twelfth fiveyear plan: a paradigm shift［J］. Energy Policy, 2012, 41(1): 519-528. 
［6］朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型［J］. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 86-95.
ZHU Qinghua, DOU Yijie. A game model for green supply chain management based on government subsidies［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2011, 14(6): 86-95.
［7］张国兴, 张绪涛, 汪应洛，等. 节能减排政府补贴的均衡边界问题研究［J］. 管理科学学报, 2014, 17(11): 129-138.
ZHANG Guoxing, ZHANG Xutao, WANG Yingluo, et al. Analysis of optimal boundary of government subsidies for energy conservation and emission reduction［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2014, 17(11): 129-138. 
［8］张国兴, 张绪涛, 程素杰，等. 节能减排补贴政策下的制造商与政府信号博弈模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(4): 129-136.
ZHANG Guoxing, ZHANG Xutao, CHENG Sujie, et al. Signaling game model of government and enterprise based on the subsidy policy for energy saving and emission reduction［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(4): 129-136. 
［9］生延超. 创新投入补贴还是创新产品补贴: 技术联盟的政府行为选择［J］. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(6): 184-192.
SHENG Yanchao. Innovation subsidies or product subsidies: The government strategy choice of technical alliance［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2008, 16(6): 184-192.
［10］方海燕, 达庆利, 朱长宁. 政府产品创新补贴下的企业R&D策略选择［J］. 技术经济与管理研究, 2011, 32(7): 31-35.
FANG Haiyan, DA Qingli, ZHU Changning. Government subsidies of enterprises under the product innovation R&D strategic choice［J］. Technoeconomics & Management Research, 2011, 32(7): 31-35. 
［11］孙浩, 张桂涛, 钟永光,等. 政府补贴下制造商回收的多期闭环供应链网络均衡［J］. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 56-64.
SUN Hao, ZHANG Guitao, ZHONG Yongguang, et al. The equilibrium of multi-period closedloop supply chain network with manufacturercollection channel under government subsidies［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(1): 56-64. 
［12］ZHU Q H, SARKIS J, GENG Y. Green supply chain management in China: Pressures practices and performance［J］. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2005, 25(5): 449-468.
［13］霍沛军, 陈继祥. 统一世界市场上针对单边R&D的补贴政策［J］. 管理科学学报, 2002, 5(3): 91-94．
HUO Peijun, CHEN Jixiang. Subsiding policy on unilateral R&D on common world market［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2002, 5(3): 91-94. 
［14］HAFEZALKOTOB A. Competition of two green and regular supply chains under environmental protection and revenue seeking policies of government［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2015, 82(10): 103-114.
［15］徐春秋, 赵道致, 原白云. 政府补贴政策下产品差别定价与供应链协调机制［J］. 系统工程, 2014, 32(3): 78-86.
XU Chunqiu, ZHAO Daozhi, YUAN Baiyun. Products differential pricing and supply chain coordination mechanism under the government subsidy policy［J］. System Engineering, 2015, 32(3): 78-86.

[1]	LUO Fuzhou, WANG Wenxin. A Research on Government Subsidy Strategy of Closed-loop Supply Chain Considering Product Green Degree [J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2020, 23(6): 18-27.
[2]	LYU Xiaohui, ZENG Xiaoyan. Pricing Strategy of Crowdfunding Products with the Success Rate [J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2019, 22(6): 89-95.
[3]	CHEN Jun, MA Yongkai, CAO Qunhui. Effect of Target Price Insurance for Agri-food under Competition Between Primary Markets [J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2017, 20(1): 20-26.
[4]	Li Bang-yi, Gu Rui, Li Ning, Liu Zhi. The Relationship Between Cost Structure and Market Structure in Remanufacturing System [J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2015, 18(6): 138-144.