工业工程 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 75-81,117.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2019.05.010

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    下一篇

资金与碳排放双重约束下低碳供应链决策研究

许彤1, 张雄2   

  1. 1. 中山职业技术学院 经济管理学院, 广东 中山 528404;
    2. 华南理工大学 工商管理学院, 广东 广州 510641
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-10 出版日期:2019-10-31 发布日期:2019-10-29
  • 作者简介:许彤(1975-),男,江西省人,副教授,硕士,主要研究方向为企业管理研究

A Study on Decision-making of Low Carbon Supply Chain under Dual Constraint of Capital and Carbon Emission

XU Tong1, ZHANG Xiong2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Zhongshan Polytechnic, Zhongshan 528404, China;
    2. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
  • Received:2018-12-10 Online:2019-10-31 Published:2019-10-29

摘要: 在低碳供应链背景下,建立制造商存在资金和碳排放双重约束下的Stackelberg博弈定价模型。探究了无资金约束、提前支付和银行贷款3种情形下企业定价和制造商融资决策问题,并分析了相关因素对最优决策和利润的影响。研究表明,当银行利率小于提前支付折扣因子时,制造商始终选择提前支付融资模式;反之,制造商的融资模式选择会受到碳排放影响因子和碳价的影响。而消费者偏好绿色产品时,可以减少制造商的融资规模,但会造成制造商和零售商利润的减少。

关键词: 资金约束, 低碳供应链, 碳排放, 提前支付

Abstract: Under the background of low carbon supply chain, a Stackelberg game pricing model with both capital and carbon emission constraints is established. Enterprise pricing and manufacturer financing decisions under three modes of non-capital constraint, prepayment and bank financing are explored, and the influence of relevant factors on optimal decision-making and profit analyzed. The research shows that when the bank interest rate is less than the prepayment discount factor, the manufacturer always chooses the prepayment financing. On the contrary, the manufacturer's financing mode choice will be affected by the carbon emission factor and the carbon price. The more consumers prefer green products, the smaller the financing scale of manufacturers will be, but the profit of manufacturers and retailers will be reduced.

Key words: capital constrained, low carbon supply chain, carbon emission, prepayment financing

中图分类号: