基于双寡头竞争的航空客运模糊销售定价决策

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2020.05.001

工业工程 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 1-10,81.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2020.05.001

• 专题论述 • 下一篇

基于双寡头竞争的航空客运模糊销售定价决策

李豪^1,2, 涂钰¹, 熊雪霞¹

1. 重庆交通大学经济与管理学院，重庆 400074;
2. 重庆交通大学西部交通与经济发展研究中心，重庆 400074

收稿日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:李豪(1982-)，男，四川省人，教授，博士，主要研究方向为收益管理和动态定价
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71402012)；2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(17YJCZH220)；重庆交通大学研究生教育创新基金资助项目(2019S0138)

Opaque Sales Pricing Decision of Airlines under Duopoly Competition

LI Hao^1,2, TU Yu¹, XIONG Xuexia¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China;
2. Western China Transportation Economy-Society Development Study Center, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China

Received:2019-07-11 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对近年来航空公司机票销售领域流行的模糊分销模式，利用Hotelling模型建立了季末单一模糊销售以及直销与模糊销售共存的双寡头竞争模型，求解供大于求和供小于求下两种销售模式各利益主体的均衡价格及收益，旨在发现哪种销售模式更有利于提高航空公司的收益。研究表明，当市场竞争激烈时，模糊分销模式存在，且季末共同销售策略下航空公司的期望总收益高于单一模糊销售，同时模糊中介商有动力实施该模式，凸显了双渠道同期销售对市场需求的引导作用。该研究结果可为航空公司竞争环境下的均衡定价决策和销售模式选择提供理论参考。

关键词: 模糊销售, 乘客策略行为, 双寡头竞争, 收益管理

Abstract: Opaque sales is a popular strategy for selling leftover capacity in airline ticket sales and is in rapid development in recent years. The Hotelling model is used to establish two models, one in traditional opaque sales channel, the other in direct channel and opaque sales channel existing at the same time. Then, the equilibrium prices and benefits of airlines and intermediary in the two sales modes of supply and demand are solved, which is to find out when the airline is most profitable. It is found that opaque sales exists when the market is competitive, and at the end of the season, the total expected revenue of the airlines under the environment of competition is higher than the traditional opaque sales. At the same time, the intermediary is motivated to implement this strategy, which highlights the guiding role of dual channel simultaneous sales to market demand. Theoretical references can be provided for the pricing in competitive and channel selection of airlines.

Key words: opaque sales, passenger strategic behavior, duopoly competition, revenue management

中图分类号:

F272.3

李豪, 涂钰, 熊雪霞. 基于双寡头竞争的航空客运模糊销售定价决策[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(5): 1-10,81.

LI Hao, TU Yu, XIONG Xuexia. Opaque Sales Pricing Decision of Airlines under Duopoly Competition[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2020, 23(5): 1-10,81.

参考文献

[1] TALLURI K T, VAN RYZIN G J. The theory and practice of revenue management[M]. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
[2] SMITH B C, DARROW J, ELIESON D, et al. Travelocity becomes a travel retailer[J]. Interfaces, 2007, 27(1): 68-81
[3] SU X. Optimal pricing with speculators and strategic consumers[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(1): 25-40
[4] JERATH K, NETESSINE S, SENTHIL K. Revenue management with strategic customers: last-minute selling and opaque selling[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(3): 430-448
[5] WANG T, GALOR E, CHATTERJEE R. The name-your-own-price channel in the travel industry: an analytical exploration[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(6): 968-979
[6] GALOR E. Pricing practices of resellers in the airline industry: posted price vs. name-your-own-price models[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2011, 20(1): 43-82
[7] ANDERSON C K, XIE X. Pricing and market segmentation using opaque selling mechanisms[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 233(1): 263-272
[8] FENG B, LIU W, MAO Z. Use of opaque sales channels in addition to traditional channels by service providers[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(1): 1-15
[9] FAY S. Selling an opaque product through an intermediary the case of disguising one's product[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2008, 84(1): 59-75
[10] CAI G, CHEN Y, WU C, et al. Probabilistic selling, channel structure, and supplier competition[J]. Decision Science, 2013, 44(2): 267-296
[11] HUANG X, SOŠIĆ G, KERSTEN G. Selling through priceline? On the impact of name-your-own price in competitive market[J]. ⅡSE Transactions, 2014, 49(3): 304-319
[12] 谭美容, 李豪. 需求不确定下考虑策略乘客的航空公司模糊销售机制[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(2): 19-25
TAN Meirong, LI Hao. Opaque selling mechanism for airlines with strategic passengers of demand uncertainty[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2017, 20(2): 19-25
[13] LEE S K, JANG S C S. Is hiding fair? Exploring consumer resistance to unfairness in opaque pricing[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2013, 34: 434-441
[14] YU S, LIU Z, WU J. Strategic behavior in the partially observable markovian queues with partial breakdowns[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2017, 45(5): 471-474
[15] 刘晓峰, 顾领. 基于消费者转换行为的线上线下产品定价策略研究[J]. 管理科学, 2016, 29(2): 27-36
LIU Xiaofeng, GU Ling. The study of pricing strategy in online-offline channel based on the consumer’s switching behavior[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2016, 29(2): 27-36
[16] DIEGO E. Estimating dynamic demand for airlines[J]. Economics Letters, 2014, 124(1): 26-29
[17] HU P, SHUN S, YU M. Joint inventory and markdown management for perishable goods with strategic consumer behavior[J]. Operations Research, 2016, 64(1): 118-134
[18] CHEN K E, YAN B. Effects of enhanced design mechanism on the pricing policy against the strategic consumer behavior[J]. Systems Engineering, 2017, 35(3): 125-130
[19] CHIANG W K, CHHAJED D, HESS J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(1): 1-20

基于双寡头竞争的航空客运模糊销售定价决策

Opaque Sales Pricing Decision of Airlines under Duopoly Competition

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李锋, 余菡. 双寡头竞争环境下消费者行为对创新产品销售影响的仿真分析[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(6): 8-16,26.
[2]	谭美容, 李豪. 需求不确定下考虑策略乘客的航空公司模糊销售机制[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(2): 19-25.
[3]	杨亚璪1,2，李鹏飞1，陈坚1，郝小妮3. 基于顾客选择行为的租赁车辆存量动态控制稳健模型[J]. 工业工程, 2016, 19(4): 140-145.
[4]	李豪1, 2，彭庆1. 竞争环境下考虑需求学习的动态定价策略[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(5): 87-92.
[5]	彭庆1，李豪2 . 考虑乘客策略行为的航空客运收益管理模型[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(4): 160-165.