基于Stackelberg博弈模型的不同主导权的三级农产品电商供应链决策分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2021.04.019

工业工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 160-167.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2021.04.019

基于Stackelberg博弈模型的不同主导权的三级农产品电商供应链决策分析

吴春尚

1. 河源职业技术学院工商管理学院，广东河源 517000;
2. 澳门城市大学商学院，澳门 999078

收稿日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2021-09-02
作者简介:吴春尚(1981-)，男，江西省人，副教授，博士，主要研究方向为物流经济、产业经济
基金资助:
广东省教育厅2018年普通高校青年创新人才资助项目(2018GWQNCX122)

A Decision-making Analysis of Agri-product E-commerce Supply Chain Based on Stackelberg Game Model

WU Chunshang

1. Faculty of Business Administration, Heyuan Polytechnic, Heyuan 517000, China;
2. Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China

Received:2020-03-25 Published:2021-09-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究不同主导权下农产品电商供应链收益分配问题，构建Stackberg博弈模型，对农产品生产商、第三方物流企业、电商企业构成的三级农产品供应链的集中决策模式和3种分散决策模式下成员最优决策行为进行分析，研究主导权对供应链最优决策的影响。结果表明，主导权对供应链成员的最优决策有显著影响，供应链成员拥有主导权时比其处于跟随地位时收益要高；在同一主导权下，拥有主导权的成员的收益要高于其他跟随地位的成员，但第三方企业除外；3种不同主导权分散决策模式下的供应链的总体利润均小于集中决策下的总利润。

关键词: 农产品电商, 供应链, 主导权, Stackelberg博弈模型

Abstract: In order to study the income distribution of agricultural product e-commerce supply chain under different dominance, the Stackelberg game model is used to analyze the decision-making behavior of the three-level agricultural product supply chain. The results show that: the dominant power has a significant impact on the optimal decision-making of supply chain members, in addition to the third-party logistics enterprises; when the member of the supply chain has the dominant power, the profit is higher than followers; under the same dominant power, the profit of the member who has the dominant power is higher than followers' profit.

Key words: agri-product e-commerce, supply chain, dominant power, Stackelberg game model

中图分类号:

F272.3

吴春尚. 基于Stackelberg博弈模型的不同主导权的三级农产品电商供应链决策分析[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 160-167.

WU Chunshang. A Decision-making Analysis of Agri-product E-commerce Supply Chain Based on Stackelberg Game Model[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2021, 24(4): 160-167.

参考文献

[1] 曾佑新, 袁盼, 张怡雯. 博弈论视角下不同主导权的生鲜电商供应链决策分析[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2019, 16(5): 55-64
ZENG Youxin, YUAN Pan, ZHANG Yiwen. Decision-making analysis of fresh E-commerce supply chain with different dominant powers from the perspective of game theory[J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2019, 16(5): 55-64
[2] SUN Y, YUAN X, SHI K. Research on decision of supply chain of fresh agricultural product based on altruism preference[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2017, 37(5): 1243-1253
[3] 王虹, 孙玉玲. 生鲜农产品供应链全渠道运营模式分析[J]. 工业工程, 2019, 22(6): 74-79, 109
WANG Hong, SUN Yuling. A study of the omni-channel operational mode of fresh agricultural products supply chain[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2019, 22(6): 74-79, 109
[4] 唐振宇, 罗新星, 陈晓红. 零售商风险规避条件下基于期权契约的生鲜农产品供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 62-72
TANG Zhenyu, LUO Xinxing, CHEN Xiaohong. Research on supply chain coordination of fresh agricultural products based on option contract under retailer's risk aversion[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(12): 62-72
[5] 刘磊, 李万明, 刘晓琳, 等. 公平偏好视角下农产品供应链双边决策行为研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(21): 35-39
LIU Lei, LI Wanming, LIU Xiaolin et al. Research on bilateral decision-making behavior of agricultural products supply chain from perspective of fairness preference[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019, 35(21): 35-39
[6] 冯颖, 李智慧, 张炎治. 零售商主导下TPL介入的生鲜农产品供应链契约效率评价[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(3): 215-225
FENG Ying, LI Zhihui, ZHANG Yanzhi. Contract efficiency evaluation in a fresh agri-products and retailer-led supply chain with TPL’s participation[J]. Management Review, 2018, 30(3): 215-225
[7] ZHENG Q, PETROS I, FAN T, et al. Supply chain contracting coordination for fresh products with fresh-keeping effort[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2017, 117(3): 289-302
[8] 周业付. 基于改进Shapley值模型的农产品供应链利益分配机制[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(23): 52-54
ZHOU Yefu. Benefit distribution mechanism of agricultural products supply chain based on improved Shapley value model[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2017(23): 52-54
[9] 熊峰, 彭健, 金鹏, 等. 生鲜农产品供应链关系契约稳定性影响研究——以冷链设施补贴模式为视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8): 102-111
XIONG Feng, PENG Jian, JIN Peng, et al. The impact of relational contracts stability about fresh agricultural product supply chain: from the perspective of cold chain facilities subsidy mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(8): 102-111

[1]	杜建国, 王雅柔. 考虑公平关切的低碳双渠道供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 18-26.
[2]	覃燕红, 向林, 秦星红. 公平偏好下考虑双边保鲜努力的生鲜农产品供应链协调研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 27-38.
[3]	邵必林, 崔梦桦. 考虑零售商公平关切的绿色供应链主体行为演化博弈研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 124-131.
[4]	李林, 雷雅琳, 何建洪. 消费者绿色偏好、参考价格效应与供应链绿色创新[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 20-26.
[5]	董海, 吴瑶. 基于PIWOA的绿色闭环供应链网络多目标模糊优化设计[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 27-35.
[6]	闵杰, 杨冉, 欧剑, 曹宗宏. 基于双向成本分担的绿色供应链运营策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 36-44.
[7]	彭永涛, 陆含, 赵艳萍. 面向延保服务的网购供应链协调策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 45-55.
[8]	李晓华, 邵举平, 孙延安. 基于SD及三方博弈的低碳供应链消费市场活力激发研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 150-159.
[9]	陈佳媛, 周刚. 不同主导权结构下服务水平对高铁快递供应链价格策略的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 168-176.
[10]	曹炳汝, 朱博文. 考虑再制造投资的闭环供应链网络均衡模型[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 1-9.
[11]	聂佳佳, 胡元潇. 制造商生产成本结构对其线上销售模式选择的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 18-25,33.
[12]	王继光, 冯琪卿, 齐凯. 供应中断和需求扰动下供应链竞合关系研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 46-53,59.
[13]	刘昊, 樊毓卿, 张诗青. 碳限额交易机制下低碳供应链协调策略[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 60-67,82.
[14]	黄帅, 杨玉中. 基于互补产品的双渠道供应链合作广告博弈分析[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 153-160.
[15]	李芳, 马艳, 王豪丽. 制造商主导下差别主体努力的闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(2): 27-33.

基于Stackelberg博弈模型的不同主导权的三级农产品电商供应链决策分析

A Decision-making Analysis of Agri-product E-commerce Supply Chain Based on Stackelberg Game Model

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价