分散供应链中混合生产的产品质量战略

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2021.02.006

工业工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 43-48,84.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2021.02.006

分散供应链中混合生产的产品质量战略

姜沂秀^1,2, 宋炳良¹

1. 上海海事大学经济管理学院，上海 201306;
2. 南通大学经济与管理学院，江苏南通 226001

收稿日期:2020-01-30 发布日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:姜沂秀(1982-)，女，江苏省人，讲师，博士研究生，主要研究方向为物流与供应链管理
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71771127)；南通市社科基金资助项目(2017CNT009)

Quality Strategy of Pooling Production in a Decentralized Supply Chain

JIANG Yixiu^1,2, SONG Bingliang¹

1. School of Economics & Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China

Received:2020-01-30 Published:2021-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用Tullock竞赛函数对混合生产的产品质量战略进行讨论。研究表明，混合生产会促进产品质量的提升，在一定条件下，制造商的产品质量甚至会高于单一自制下的产品质量；若外包供应商收取的批发价格足够低，制造商更倾向于混合生产而非单一外包和单一自制；实施混合生产可能会伤害外包供应商；制造商偏好烈性较强的质量竞赛，而外包供应商偏好烈性较弱的质量竞赛。

关键词: 供应链质量管理, Tullock竞赛函数, 混合生产, 博弈论

Abstract: Employing the Tullock contest success function, a noncooperative game model is established to explain how the players compete in the quality contest. The strategy of pooling production definitely brings supplier's quality improvement with comparison to outsourcing while conditionally making the manufacturer's product quality higher than in-house manufacturing. The manufacturer prefers pooling production to outsourcing and in-house manufacturing if the wholesale price charged by the supplier is sufficient low enough. However, the supplier could be hurt by the implementation of pooling production when comparing with outsourcing. Additionally, the manufacturer may prefer a fiercer contest, while the supplier may enjoy a more temperate contest.

Key words: supply chain quality management, the Tullock contest success function, pooling production, game theory

中图分类号:

F272.3

姜沂秀, 宋炳良. 分散供应链中混合生产的产品质量战略[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(2): 43-48,84.

JIANG Yixiu, SONG Bingliang. Quality Strategy of Pooling Production in a Decentralized Supply Chain[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2021, 24(2): 43-48,84.

参考文献

[1] VITASEK K, MANRODT K. What five great economists can tell us about outsourcing[J]. Supply Chain Management Review, 2012, 16(4): 18-25
[2] GILLEY K M, RASHEED A. Making more by doing less: an analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(4): 763-790
[3] GRAY J V, TOMLIN B, ROTH A V. Outsourcing to a powerful contract manufacturer: the effect of learning-by-doing[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(5): 487-505
[4] BENJAAFAR S, ELAHI E, DONOHUE K L. Outsourcing via service competition[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(2): 241-259
[5] CACHON G P, ZHANG F. Obtaining fast service in a queueing system via performance-based allocation of demand[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(3): 408-420
[6] XU X. Optimal price and product quality decisions in a distribution channel[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(8): 1347-1352
[7] KAYA O. Outsourcing vs. in-house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand[J]. Omega, 2011, 39(2): 168-178
[8] XIE G, WANG S Y, LAI K K. Quality improvement in competing supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(1): 262-270
[9] XIAO T J, XIA Y S, ZHANG G P. Strategic outsourcing decisions for manufacturers competing on product quality[J]. IIE Transactions, 2014, 46(4): 313-329
[10] ZHU X W. Outsourcing management under various demand information sharing scenarios[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 257(1-2): 449-467
[11] FENG Q, LU L X. The strategic perils of low cost outsourcing[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(6): 1196-1210
[12] KAYA M, OZER O. Quality risk in outsourcing: noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2009, 56(7): 669-685
[13] TSAY A A, AGRAWAL N. Channel dynamics under price and service competition[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2000, 2(4): 372-391
[14] GARVIN D. What does product quality really mean[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1984, 26(1): 25-43
[15] NTI K O. Rent-seeking with asymmetric valuations[J]. Public Choice, 1999, 98(3-4): 415-430

分散供应链中混合生产的产品质量战略

Quality Strategy of Pooling Production in a Decentralized Supply Chain

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郑本荣, 云方旭. 制造商竞争环境下供应链CSR投入模式选择研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 39-46.
[2]	魏杰, 王玉超, 田晨. 基于电商平台的互补产品捆绑策略及销售模式研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 47-54.
[3]	刘盾, 宋慧玲, 聂佳佳. 考虑努力水平的网络零售商定价决策与渠道选择研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 1-9,18.
[4]	刘盾, 宋慧玲, 聂佳佳. 放弃制造商品牌？——制造商入侵与自有品牌引入的博弈分析[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(1): 35-43,58.
[5]	王雪萍, 谢灿, 高新勤, 王珊珊. 基于博弈论的云制造服务平台价格战应对策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(1): 53-58.
[6]	李文龙. 契约博弈结合下农产品O2O二级供应链协调[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(1): 126-133.
[7]	刘欣艺, 张银丹. 基于制造商—销售商供应链双向补贴博弈研究[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(6): 64-71,90.
[8]	王宁, 苗瑞, 江志斌. 基于博弈论的公立医院分级诊疗服务策略[J]. 工业工程, 2017, 20(2): 26-31.
[9]	孔造杰1, 李伟2, 张亚萍3. 价格差异的三级闭环供应链定价与协调策略[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(1): 90-95.
[10]	李伟1, 孔造杰1, 肖美丹2. 混合渠道下闭环供应链回收与协调定价研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(5): 45-52.
[11]	李卫红1，2, 白杨1. 竞争供应链R&D投资策略与协同机制研究[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(2): 80-86.
[12]	高鹏，谢忠秋，谢印成. 不对称信息下零售商主导的闭环供应链协作机制[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(1): 79-85.
[13]	辛广茜1，史成东1，谢云2，闫厚强2，路洪斌2. 考虑政府补贴的第三方回收再制造闭环供应链研究[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(6): 70-75.
[14]	赵道致, 高帅, 何龙飞. 随机产出下基于CDM基准线选择的多企业碳减排博弈[J]. 工业工程, 2012, 15(3): 1-6.