同时考虑政府补贴与企业成本分担的绿色供应链决策

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.06.004

工业工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 29-38.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2022.06.004

同时考虑政府补贴与企业成本分担的绿色供应链决策

林强^1,2, 刘名武¹

1. 重庆交通大学经济与管理学院，重庆 400074;
2. 重庆第二师范学院生物与化学工程学院，重庆 400067

收稿日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2022-12-23
作者简介:林强(1988—)，男，河南省人，副教授，博士研究生，主要研究方向为物流与供应链管理
基金资助:
重庆市社科规划一般资助项目(2020YBGL68)；四川省循环经济研究中心重点课题资助项目(XHJJ-2004)；系统科学与企业发展研究中心一般课题资助项目(Xq20C01)；重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究资助项目(22SKGH460)

Green Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Government Subsidy and Enterprise Cost-sharing

LIN Qiang^1,2, LIU Mingwu¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China;
2. School of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, China

Received:2021-04-01 Published:2022-12-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究政府补贴和企业成本分担对绿色供应链绿色努力水平、定价策略以及利润的影响，并分析不同政府补贴模式下决策结果的差异性，运用博弈论及数值仿真相结合的方法对3种决策情形下的绿色供应链最优决策进行研究。结果表明，零售商成本分担能够有效激励制造商提高绿色努力投入，但分担比例越大对零售商越不利。政府补贴对供应链成员均有利且有激励作用，但是政府补贴且零售商分担成本时的激励效果弱于仅有政府补贴的情形，此时零售商成本分担的激励作用被弱化甚至产生不利影响。无论零售商是否分担绿色努力成本，政府补贴消费者的激励效果要优于补贴制造商。研究有助于政府与绿色供应链企业在决策互动中作出最佳选择。

关键词: 绿色供应链, 政府补贴, 成本分担, 最优决策

Abstract: In order to explore the impact of government subsidy and enterprise cost-sharing on green efforts level, pricing strategy and profit of green supply chain, and analyze the difference of decision results under different government subsidy modes, the green supply chain members' optimal strategies are studied by using game theory and numerical simulation method. The results show that the retailer's cost-sharing can effectively motivate the manufacturer to increase investment in green efforts. But the higher the share ratio, the more disadvantage for the retailer. Government subsidy is beneficial to all members of the supply chain and has a good incentive effect, but the incentive effect is weaker when the government subsidy and the retailer's cost-sharing co-exist, because the incentive effect of the retailer's cost-sharing is weakened and even has an adverse effect compared with the situation of cost-sharing only. Regardless of whether the retailer shares the cost of green efforts, the incentive effect of government subsidy to the consumer is better than subsidy to the manufacturer. This research can help the government and green supply chain companies to make the best choice in the decision-making interaction.

Key words: green supply chain, government subsidy, cost-sharing, optimal decision

中图分类号:

F274

林强, 刘名武. 同时考虑政府补贴与企业成本分担的绿色供应链决策[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(6): 29-38.

LIN Qiang, LIU Mingwu. Green Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Government Subsidy and Enterprise Cost-sharing[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2022, 25(6): 29-38.

参考文献

[1] 曹裕, 寻静雅, 李青松. 基于不同政府补贴策略的供应链绿色努力决策比较研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 108-118
CAO Yu, XUN Jingya, LI Qingsong. A comparative study of green efforts in supply chain based on different government subsidy strategies[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(5): 108-118
[2] 士明军, 王勇, 吉进迪, 等. 政府补贴下绿色供应链需求预测信息共享研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(4): 119-125
SHI Mingjun, WANG Yong, JI Jindi, et al. Information sharing with respect to green supply chain demand forecasts under government subdidies[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 2020, 34(4): 119-125
[3] 张子元, 傅端香. 考虑互惠利他偏好和政府补贴的绿色供应链最优决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(5): 149-157
ZHANG Ziyuan, FU Duanxiang. A research on the optimal decision of green supply chain considering reciprocal altruistic preference and government subsidies[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2020, 23(5): 149-157
[4] MENG Q, LI M, LIU W, et al. Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: considering government subsidies and consumers' dual preferences[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 26: 1021-1030
[5] YUAN X, ZHANG X, ZHANG D. Research on the dynamics game model in a green supply chain: government subsidy strategies under the retailer's selling effort level[J]. Complexity, 2020, 2020: 1-15
[6] YU J J, TANG C S, SHEN Z M. Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs: subsidizing consumers or manufacturers[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(4): 752-766
[7] 尚春燕, 关志民, 米力阳. 考虑双重消费偏好的绿色供应链政府补贴策略分析[J]. 系统工程, 2020, 38(5): 93-102
SHANG Chunyan, GUAN Zhimin, MI Liyang. Analysis of government subsidy strategy for green supply chain considering dual consumption preference[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 38(5): 93-102
[8] MADANI S R, RASTI-BARZOKI M. Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: a game-theoretic approach[J]. Computers &Industrial Engineering, 2017, 105: 287-298
[9] YI Y Y, LI J X. The effect of governmental policies of carbon taxes and energy-saving subsidies on enterprise decisions in a two-echelon supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 181: 675-691
[10] BIAN J S, ZHANG G Q, ZHOU G H. Manufacturer vs. consumer subsidy with green technology investment and environment concern[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 287(3): 832-843
[11] 王道平, 王婷婷, 张博卿. 基于微分博弈的供应链合作减排和政府补贴策略[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34(8): 1733-1744
WANG Daoping, WANG Tingting, ZHANG Boqing. Reduce emissions in cooperation and government subsidies strategies in supply chain based on differential game[J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 34(8): 1733-1744
[12] GHOSH D, SHAH J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164: 319-329
[13] 许格妮, 陈惠汝, 武晓莉, 等. 竞争供应链中绿色成本分担博弈分析[J]. 系统工程学报, 2020, 35(4): 244-255
XU Geni, CHEN Huiru, WU Xiaoli, et al. Game analysis on green cost-sharing between competing supply chains[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2020, 35(4): 244-255
[14] MA N, GAO R, WANG X, et al. Green supply chain analysis under cost sharing contract with uncertain information based on confidence level[J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24(4): 2617-2635
[15] SHARM A A, JAIN D. Game-theoretic analysis of green supply chain under cost-sharing contract with fairness concerns[J]. International Game Theory Review, 2021, 23(2): 1-32
[16] LIU P. Pricing rules of green supply chain considering big data information inputs and cost-sharing model[J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25(13): 8515-8531

同时考虑政府补贴与企业成本分担的绿色供应链决策

Green Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Government Subsidy and Enterprise Cost-sharing

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁喜, 刘莹. 考虑社会责任和政府补贴的双渠道供应链决策与协调[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(5): 29-37.
[2]	杜建国, 胡佶哲. 关注消费者剩余的快时尚绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(5): 38-46.
[3]	周辉. 基于过度自信的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(5): 47-54.
[4]	相模, 李芳. 政府补贴对风险规避型绿色供应链决策影响研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(5): 159-170.
[5]	郭春香, 万科, 黄海珍. 消费者细分下考虑差别权重补贴的闭环供应链定价研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(3): 28-38.
[6]	蒋雷勇, 孙立成. 异质性减排政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(3): 164-172.
[7]	杨怀珍, 朱雅琴. 推广溢出效应下O2O农产品供应链联合契约协调[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(2): 50-58.
[8]	于溪源, 温艳. 动态视角下医药供应链成员行为选择研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(2): 70-78,104.
[9]	李璐璐, 庞静娅, 牟文静, 田立平. 基于专利保护与政府补贴下考虑互惠偏好的快递包装回收决策分析[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(2): 155-162.
[10]	郭三党, 荆亚倩, 李倩. 考虑政府补贴和不同回收渠道的再制造闭环供应链最优决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(1): 19-27.
[11]	贺勇, 钱婷婷, 廖诺. 外包情境下品牌商主导的绿色供应链减排决策分析[J]. 工业工程, 2022, 25(1): 37-44,143.
[12]	邵必林, 崔梦桦. 考虑零售商公平关切的绿色供应链主体行为演化博弈研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(5): 124-131.
[13]	闵杰, 杨冉, 欧剑, 曹宗宏. 基于双向成本分担的绿色供应链运营策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(4): 36-44.
[14]	宋英华, 曹雪竹, 刘丹. 考虑风险规避与零售商谎报行为的绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(1): 19-26,34.
[15]	罗福周, 王文心. 考虑产品绿色度的闭环供应链政府补贴策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(6): 18-27.