考虑混合补贴和消费者敏感的生鲜农产品供应链定价决策

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.220250

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在单个供应商和单个电商构成的生鲜农产品供应链系统中，引入消费者敏感系数、政府保鲜技术补贴额和电商绿色研发补贴率等参数，运用Stackelberg博弈对比分析了政府保鲜技术补贴、电商绿色研发补贴、混合补贴对供应链决策的影响。研究表明，在3种模式下，增加消费者对新鲜度或绿色度的敏感度有利于提高供应链成员利润和社会福利；在适度的消费者绿色度敏感下，政府或电商提供的补贴都有利于提升社会福利，且混合补贴最有利；混合补贴下的供应商投入保鲜努力、产品绿色度、产品需求以及供应商利润最高；在适度的电商绿色研发补贴率下，混合补贴对生鲜电商最有利，若绿色研发补贴率过高，则单一政府补贴更有利。

关键词: 供应链, 定价, 补贴, 绿色度, 生鲜农产品

Abstract: In a supply chain system of fresh agricultural products composed of a single supplier and a single e-commerce, parameters such as consumer sensitivity coefficient, government fresh-keeping technology subsidy and e-commerce green research and development (R&D) subsidy rate are introduced. The effects of government fresh-keeping technology subsidy, e-commerce green R&D subsidy and mixed subsidies on supply chain decision-making are compared and analyzed by Stackelberg game. Results show that increasing consumer sensitivity to freshness or green degree is conducive to improving the profits and social welfare of supply chain members across three modes; with moderate consumer sensitivity to green degree, subsidies provided by the government or e-commerce are conducive to improving social welfare, with mixed subsidies being the most advantageous; under the mode of mixed subsidies, the supplier maximizes efforts in freshness preservation, product green degree, product demand and its profit; with a moderate green R&D subsidy rate of e-commerce, mixed subsidies are most beneficial to fresh e-commerce. If the green R&D subsidy rate is excessively high, single government subsidies become more beneficial.

Key words: supply chain, pricing, subsidies, green degree, fresh agricultural products

中图分类号:

梁喜, 魏玉莲. 考虑混合补贴和消费者敏感的生鲜农产品供应链定价决策[J]. 工业工程, 2024, 27(4): 82-92.

LIANG Xi, WEI Yulian. A Pricing Strategy of Fresh Agricultural Product Supply Chains Considering Mixed Subsidies and Consumer Sensitivity[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2024, 27(4): 82-92.

参考文献

[1] 姚磊, 王晶, 刘曦瞳, 等. 智慧社区一体化建设运营的路径研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2024, 45(6): 29-36.
YAO Lei, WANG Jing, LIU Xitong, etal. Research on the path of integrated construction and operation of smart community[J]. Construction Economy, 2024, 45 (6): 29-36.
[2] QIN Y, WANG J, WEI C. Joint pricing and inventory control for fresh produce and foods with quality and physical quantity deteriorating simultaneously[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 152(2): 42-48
[3] HERBON A. Optimal piecewise-constant price under heterogeneous sensitivity to product freshness[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(2): 365-385
[4] ZHENG Q, IEROMONACHOU P, FAN T, et al. Supply chain contracting coordination for fresh products with fresh-keeping effort[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2017, 117(3): 538-559
[5] 梁喜, 何荣双. 不同直销渠道下生鲜农产品双渠道供应链定价策略[J]. 世界农业, 2019, 485(9): 69-81
LIANG Xi, HE Rongshuang. Pricing strategy of fresh agricultural products dual channel supply chain under different direct marketing channels[J]. World Agriculture, 2019, 485(9): 69-81
[6] 闻卉, 许明辉, 陶建平. 考虑绿色度的生鲜农产品供应链的销售模式与定价策略[J]. 武汉大学学报 (理学版) , 2020, 66 (5) : 495-504.
WEN Hui, XU Minghui, TAO Jianping. Sales mode and pricing strategy of fresh agricultural product supply chain considering green degree [J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Science Edition) , 2020, 66 (5) : 495-504.
[7] 朴惠淑, 扈秀静. 绿色和保鲜消费导向的生鲜农产品供应链协调[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(4): 1-10
PIAO Huishu, HU Xiujing. Supply chain coordination of fresh agricultural products oriented by green and fresh-keeping consumption[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2020, 23(4): 1-10
[8] 周涛, 吕圆圆, 周亚萍. “农超对接”双渠道生鲜农产品供应链协调研究——基于不同主体保鲜努力视角[J]. 管理现代化, 2022, 42(1): 8-16
[9] DIMITRI C, OBERHOLTZERr L, ZIVE M, et al. Enhancing food security of low-income consumers: an investigation of financial incentives for use at farmers markets[J]. Food Policy, 2015, 52: 64-70
[10] DEMIRDEN A, OLHAN E, CHAVAS J P. Food vs. fiber: An analysis of agricultural support policy in Turkey[J]. Food Policy, 2016, 61: 1-8
[11] PENG H, PANG T. Optimal strategies for a three-level contract-farming supply chain with subsidy[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 216: 274-286
[12] 陈军, 马永开, 曹群辉. 基于税收再补贴的农产品供应链均衡定价与政策效应[J]. 系统工程, 2018, 36(2): 136-140
CHEN Jun, MA Yongkai, CAO Qunhui. Equilibrium pricing and policy effect of agricultural product supply chain based on tax subsidies[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018, 36(2): 136-140
[13] 李萌昕. 财政补贴对农产品供应链渠道选择的影响研究[J]. 农业经济, 2020, 394(2): 116-117
[14] 闻卉, 王先甲, 陶建平, 等. 零售商合作偏好下生鲜农产品供应链的政府补贴机制与优化策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30 (9) : 100-106.
WEN Hui, WANG Xianjia, TAO Jianping, et al. Government subsidy mechanism and optimization strategy of fresh agricultural product supply chain under retailer cooperation preference [J]. Operations Research and Management, 2021, 30 (9) : 100-106.
[15] 张旭梅, 朱江华, 但斌, 等. 公益性影响下考虑主体差异的生鲜农产品政府补贴策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(4): 230-239
ZHANG Xumei, ZHU Jianghua, DAN Bin, et al. The government subsidy strategy for fresh agricultural products under the influence of public welfare considering the difference of subjects[J]. Journal of Management Engineering, 2022, 36(4): 230-239
[16] 刘墨林, 但斌, 马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
LIU Molin, DAN Bin, MA Songxuan. Optimal decision-making and coordination of fresh food e-commerce supply chain considering preservation efforts and value-added services [J]. China Management Science, 2020, 2 (8): 76-88.
[17] CHAMBERS C, KOUVELIS P, SEMPLE J. Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(12): 1884-1895