新产品质量对闭环供应链再制造模式选择的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2018.05.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了新产品质量对闭环供应链回收再制造模式选择的影响。借助博弈论，建立了原制造商外包再制造和授权再制造的Stackelberg博弈模型，利用逆向归纳法解得两个模型的均衡解和供应链利润，并对均衡结果进行了比较分析。研究发现：外包再制造模式的供应链利润、消费者剩余、社会福利均优于授权再制造模式。原制造商选择外包再制造模式的利润要高于授权再制造模式，而第三方制造商最优策略受再制品价值折扣与新产品质量的影响。当再制品价值折扣系数与回收规模满足一定条件，而且新产品质量较高时，原制造商采取外包模式对环境更加友好。

关键词: 产品质量, 再制造, 闭环供应链, Stackelberg博弈, 外包, 专利授权

Abstract: Considering the quality of new products, the choice of OEM (original equipment manufacturers) and 3PR(third-party remanufacturers) on closed-loop supply chain remanufacturing model is studied. We develop two Stackleberg models where manufacturers perform remanufacturing operations through either outsourcing or authorization based on game theory. The backward induction analysis method is applied to get the equilibrium solution and supply chain profits on remanufacturing operation selections. This study compares these two models by modeling the game results between the OEM and the 3PR.The results suggest that the outsourcing approach under Stackleberg Game get an advantage over authorization approach in supply chain profits, consumer surplus and social welfare. In both scenarios, the OEM obtains higher profits through outsourcing approach. The 3PR has different selection in terms of the consumer value discount for the remanufactured product and new product quality. When the consumer value discount for the remanufactured product and the scaling parameter meet certain conditions, as well as the high quality of new products. Outsourcing remanufacturing is more environmentally friendly than authorization remanufacturing.

Key words: product quality, remanufacturing, closed-loop supply chain, Stackelberg equilibrium, outsourcing, patent authorization

中图分类号:

F270.5

聂佳佳, 熊璐洁. 新产品质量对闭环供应链再制造模式选择的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(5): 31-39,63.

NIE Jiajia, XIONG Lujie. Effect of New Product Quality on Remanufacturing Models in Closed-loop Supply Chain[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal , 2018, 21(5): 31-39,63.

参考文献

[1] CHEN J M,. The co-operative strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2012, 48(2):387-400.
[2] 聂佳佳, 邓东方. 再制造产品质量对闭环供应链回收渠道的影响[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2014, 19(1):1-7. NIE Jiajia, DENG Dongfang. Effect of remanufacturing product quality on recovery channel in closed-l oop supply chain[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2014, 19(1):1-7.
[3] SAVASKAN R C, BHATTACHARYA S, WASSENHOVE L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.
[4] SAVASKAN R C, WASSENHOVE L N. Reverse channel desi-gn:the case of competing retailers[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1):1-14.
[5] 熊中楷, 申成然, 彭志强. 专利保护下再制造闭环供应链协调机制研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6):76-85. XIONG Zhongkai, SHEN Chengran, PENG Zhiqiang. Closed loop supply chain coordination research with remanufacturing under patent protection[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2011, 14(6):76-85.
[6] FERRER G, SWAMINATHAN J M. Managing new and remanufactured Products[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1):15-26.
[7] MAJUMDER P, GROENEVELT H. Competition in remanufacturing[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2001, 10(2):125-141.
[8] 黄宗盛, 聂佳佳, 胡培. 专利保护下的闭环供应链再制造模式选择策略[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2012, 17(6):15-21. HUANG Zongsheng, NIE Jiajia, HU Pei. Research on the remanufacturing models of closed-loop supply chain under patent licensing[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2012, 17(6):15-21.
[9] MITRA S, WEBSTER S. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 111(2):287-298.
[10] 黄祖庆, 达庆利. 直线型再制造供应链决策结构的效率分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2006, 9(4):51-57. HUANG Zuqing, DA Qingli. Study on efficiency of serial supply chains with remanufacture[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2006, 9(4):51-57.
[11] ZOU Z B, WANG J J, DENG G S, et al. Third-party remanufacturing mode selection:outsourcing or authorization?[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2016, 87(3):1-19.
[12] POKHAREL S, LIANG Y J. A model to evaluate acquisition price and quantity of used products for remanufacturing[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 138(1):170-176.
[13] 谢家平, 迟琳娜, 梁玲. 基于产品质量内生的制造/再制造最优生产决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(8):12-23. XIE Jiaping, CHI Linna, LIANG Ling. Optimal manufacturing/remanufacturing production decision based on endogenous pro-duct quality[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2012, 15(8):12-23.
[14] 许民利, 张璇, 简惠云. 考虑品牌优势和成本差异的再制造决策[J]. 管理学报, 2016, 13(8):1241-1249. XU Minli, ZHANG Xuan, JIAN Huiyun. Remanufacturing decision based on brand advantages and cost difference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016, 13(8):1241-1249.
[15] 刘家国, 周学龙, 赵金楼. 基于产品质量差异的闭环供应链定价策略与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S2):426-431. LIU Jiaguo, ZHOU Xuelong, ZHAO jinlou. Study on price decision and coordination of closed-loop supply chain based on quality difference of product[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(S2):426-431.
[16] 曹俊, 熊中楷, 刘莉莎. 闭环供应链中新件制造商和再制造商的价格及质量水平竞争[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(5):82-90. CAO jun, XIONG Zhongkai, LIU Lisha. Price and quality competition between the new and remanufactured producer in the closed-loop supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2010, 18(5):82-90.
[17] Örsdemir A, KEMAHLIOGLU-ZIYA E, PARLAKTURK A K. Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2014, 23(1):48-64.
[18] 熊中楷, 曹俊, 刘克俊. 基于动态博弈的闭环供应链回收质量控制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(4):42-50. XIONG Zhongkai, CAO Jun, LIU Kejun. Study on the quality control policy in the closed loop supply chain based on the dynamic game theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(4):42-50.
[19] GALBRETH M R, BLACKBURN J D. Optimal acquisition and sorting policies for remanufacturing[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2006, 15(3):384-392.
[20] FERGUSON M, GUIDE V D, KOCA E, et al. The value of quality grading in remanufacturing[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2009, 18(3):300-314.
[21] RAZ G, DRUEHL C T, BLASS V. Design for the environment:life-cycle approach using a newsvendor model[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2013, 22(4):940-957.