工业工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 35-46.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2023.06.004

• 系统分析与管理决策 • 上一篇    下一篇

需求波动、竞争强度对供应链主导权力优势的影响研究

何征, 蒋雪, 冯春   

  1. 西南交通大学 交通运输与物流学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2024-01-09
  • 作者简介:何征(1986-),女,四川省人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为物流与供应链管理
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般资助项目 (17BGL085)

Influence of Demand Fluctuations and Competition Intensity on Dominant Power Advantages of Supply Chains

HE Zheng, JIANG Xue, FENG Chun   

  1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiao Tong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2022-06-30 Published:2024-01-09

摘要: 针对由多个供应商和多个零售商组成的供应链,用Cournot-Stackelberg博弈、Market-Stackelberg博弈和Market-Nash博弈模拟上游卖方的供应链主导权力逐渐降低、下游买方权力增加的情况,对比分析3种模式下的均衡决策和供应链绩效及其对需求波动、市场竞争强度等外部市场变化的反应。研究表明,1) 在卖方主导的供应链中,买方权力的增加降低了市场均衡产量和批发价格。2) 面对强烈的需求波动,上下游权力均衡可促使均衡产量和批发价格更为稳定。3) 当市场需求波动较小时,供应链主导权带来更高的利润水平,供应链参与者可积极争夺主导权;但当需求波动很大时,供应链主导权带来的利润优势不再显著,不必花费大量成本争取主导权。4) 上游供应商的激烈竞争会促使上游放弃争夺供应链主导权,且对下游零售商争取权力的诱导作用不大。而下游激烈的水平竞争则会同时刺激供应商和零售商积极争夺主导权。5) 加剧市场竞争有利于提升供应链总利润,因此鼓励竞争有利于社会整体经济发展。

关键词: 需求不确定, 供应链竞争, 博弈, 结构权力, 主导权力

Abstract: For a supply chain consisting of multiple suppliers and retailers, this paper utilizes Cournot-Stackelberg, Market-Stackelberg and Market-Nash game models to simulate the situation where the market dominant power of upstream sellers gradually decreases while the power of downstream buyers increases. The equilibrium decisions and supply chain performance are compared and analyzed under three modes, as well as their responses to external market changes such as demand fluctuations and market competition intensity. Results show as follows. 1) In a seller-dominated supply chain, the increase in buyer power reduces market equilibrium production and wholesale prices. 2) With strong demand fluctuations, a balance of upstream and downstream power can achieve more stable equilibrium production and wholesale prices. 3) When market demand fluctuations are small, dominant power of a supply chain brings a higher profit level, and participants can actively compete for the power; however, when demand fluctuates greatly, the profit advantage brought by market dominance is not significant, and there is no need to spend a lot of cost for market dominance. 4) The fierce competition of upstream suppliers induces them to give up competing for market dominance in a supply chain, but it has little effect on downstream retailers to strive for market dominant power. However, the fierce horizontal competition downstream stimulates both suppliers and retailers to actively compete for market dominant power. 5) Intensified market competition improves the total profit of a supply chain, so as to encourage that competition is beneficial to the overall economic development of society.

Key words: uncertain demand, supply chain competition, game, structure power, dominant power

中图分类号: