工业工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 72-80.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2018.06.010

• 专题论述 • 上一篇    下一篇

碳标签制度下供应商参与碳减排的供应链决策研究

申成然, 刘小媛   

  1. 重庆交通大学 经济与管理学院, 重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-18 出版日期:2018-12-30 发布日期:2018-12-29
  • 作者简介:申成然(1979-),男,河南省人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为闭环供应链管理、低碳经济
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科资助项目(18YJC630141);重庆市科委基础与前沿研究计划资助项目(cstc2014jcyjA20014);重庆市教委科学技术研究资助项目(KJ1400315)

Decision of Supply Chain with Supplier Participating in Carbon Emission Reduction under Carbon Labelling System

SHEN Chengran, LIU Xiaoyuan   

  1. School of Economic and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2018-04-18 Online:2018-12-30 Published:2018-12-29

摘要: 研究了碳标签制度下供应商参与碳减排的供应链决策问题。在考虑消费者低碳偏好情况下,探讨了3种减排模式:制造商和供应商均不投资碳减排(N模型)、仅制造商投资碳减排(M模型)、制造商和供应商均投资碳减排(SM模型)。结果表明,供应商参与碳减排投资后双方利润均多于仅制造商投资碳减排的模型,同时双方的碳排放量又少于仅制造商投资碳减排的模型,显然供应商参与碳减排促进了供应链整体经济效益和环境效益的提升。

关键词: 碳标签制度, 消费者低碳偏好, 碳减排投资, 供应商参与

Abstract: The decision of the supply chain with supplier participating in carbon emission reduction under carbon labelling system is studied. Considering consumer's low-carbon preference, three models are built:neither the manufacturer nor the supplier invests in carbon emission reduction (model N), only the manufacturer invests in carbon emission reduction (model M), both the supplier and the manufacturer invest in carbon emission reduction (model SM). The results show that the profits in model SM is higher than that in model N and in model M. Meanwhile, the carbon emission in model SM is lower than that in model N and in model M. Thus supplier's participating in emission reduction promotes both the environmental benefit and economic benefit.

Key words: carbon labelling system, consumer's low-carbon preference, carbon emission reduction invest, supplier participation

中图分类号: